Sentences with phrase «teach a subject measured»

For the teachers that don't teach a subject measured on the test, the state still uses the students verbal and math test scores.

Not exact matches

He is willing to accept what Christians have received from barbarians as long as Christians are willing to subject their teaching to «Greek proof,» i.e., to measure it by Celsus» standards as to what is reasonable.

Supplements Epidemic Dysentery Controlling Cholera Diarrhoea and Drugs Persistent Diarrhoea Refugees and Displaced Communities Shigellosis Teaching tools and techniques Breastfeeding Practical Hygiene Children's Poster Competition Weaning Water and Sanitation Immunisation Growth Monitoring Photographic Competition Results Oral Rehydration Therapy Subject Index Aetiology Cholera Escherichia Coli Parasites Rotavirus Shigella Drug therapy Antimicrobials Epidemiology Health education and training Health education Training Immunisation Laboratory services Nutrition Breastfeeding Feeding and diarrhoea Growth monitoring Vitamin A Malnutrition and diarrhoea Weaning General Oral rehydration therapy Management of diarrhoea Infants Formula Measuring ORS Sanitation and hygiene Handwashing Latrines Survey and evaluation methods Traditional remedies / local beliefs Urban health Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Behaviour Water supply Water purification Women

Two other studies — one involving 79 pairs of teachers in Los Angeles (which I wrote with Douglas Staiger) and the Measures of Effective Teaching study involving 1,591 teachers in six different school districts (which I wrote with Dan McCaffrey, Trey Miller and Douglas Staiger)-- randomly assigned teachers to different groups of students within a grade and subject in a school.

Also, in middle school and high school, where the number of students taught in a given subject is larger, the stability of the measures tends to be higher.

Right now we are using proxy measures, such as whether a teacher has a major in the subject he or she teaches, but that does nt get at whether the students of that teacher are learning.

While this positive response is certainly dependent on the special nature of the objective - setting process in Denver — a process in which teachers collaborated directly with their principals to set goals based on individually measured baselines for the students they taught, in the subject matter they taught — this response still flies in the face of preconceptions that teachers fear pay for performance based on student growth because it will harm collegial relations.

But not for all the usual reasons that people raise concerns: the worry about whether we've got good measures of teacher performance, especially for instructors in subjects other than reading and math; the likelihood that tying achievement to evaluations will spur teaching to the test in ways that warp instruction and curriculum; the futility of trying to «principal - proof» our schools by forcing formulaic, one - size - fits - all evaluation models upon all K — 12 campuses; the terrible timing of introducing new evaluation systems at the same time that educators are working to implement the Common Core.

Roughly one - quarter of K — 12 teachers typically teach in grades and subjects where obtaining such measures is currently possible.

Because an accountability test that supports teaching is focused on only a very limited number of challenging curricular aims, a student's mastery of each subject can be meaningfully measured, letting teachers determine how effective their instruction has been.

In essence, therefore, our two measures of teaching quality reflect, in the first case, value added (or «deep learning») that is transferrable to subsequent classes in the subject, and, in the second case, inspiration, as indicated by the ability to convert students to a subject that they had not previously planned on studying in depth.

[vi] What is needed are measures of teaching effectiveness that are not subject to these types of biases.

[ix] We build on the work of other researchers [x] in examining the likelihood of taking additional courses in a subject area as a measure of teaching excellence — the more likely a student is to continue studying in a particular discipline, the better the teacher is thought to have been.

Even though value - added measures accurately gauge teachers» impacts on test scores, it could still be the case that high - VA teachers simply «teach to the test,» either by narrowing the subject matter in the curriculum or by having students learn test - taking strategies that consistently increase test scores but do not benefit students later in their lives.

As we, and others, get better at evaluating and measuring the impact of what we do, more people will understand that outdoor learning can enrich taught subjects back in the classroom.

For the majority of teachers, whose students don't take a state test on the subject they teach, gains would be measured by students» gains from a spring or fall pre-test to a spring post-test in their subject.

New teacher evaluation systems are the latest effort to measure and improve the quality of the teaching workforce, but these new systems have already raised concerns that they will be subject to the same rating inflation by administrators that plagued previous systems.

If yes, welcome to a world of tests from gym to art — or worse, state test measures in math and English applied to folks who don't teach those two subjects (try explaining that to teachers or, for that matter, your neighbor).

Acknowledging the «unfairness» of the evaluations, Walker said that a system should measure the individual effectiveness of each teacher, but noted that the «FCAT VAM has been applied to teachers whose students are tested in a subject that teacher does not teach and to teachers who are measured on students they have never taught....

But only a third of teachers teach grades or subjects measured by state standardized tests, so administrators use different measures to rate the rest.

It's not immediately apparent what subjects each of these teachers teach but 8 of the top 10 don't even teach the courses that are measured by the state's math and reading tests that were used to calculate the value added measures.

The same concept applies to using differences in teachers» measured performance across different sections (e.g. at the secondary level, where teachers often teach multiple sections of the same subject) to gauge the extent to which measurement error may lead to inaccurate assessments.

Since school spending per pupil has been relatively stable in real terms for the last seven years, allocating extra curriculum time and resources to teaching EBacc subjects may have often implied diverting them from non-EBacc subjects that offer less benefit in terms of school performance, as evaluated by the new headline measures.

States can reserve up to 3 percent of their Title II funds for investments in «teacher, principal, or other school leader certification, recertification licensing, or tenure systems or preparation program standards and approval processes to ensure that (i) teachers have the necessary subject - matter knowledge and teaching skills, as demonstrated through measures determined by the State.»

For those who teach subjects not tested by the state, the proposal would increase the weight of observations and locally developed measures.

One of the most vexing problems that many education systems have faced is how to measure student growth, or learning, for the vast majority of teachers who don't teach in tested subjects or grades.

First, measuring a broad array of subjects and skills encourages teachers to teach them all and try to do it well.

Praxis I ® measures basic academic skills; Praxis II ® measures general and subject - specific knowledge and teaching skills; and Praxis III ® assesses classroom performance.

Including these measures along with standardized testing would not only encourage teachers to teach a wide range of subjects well, but would also accomplish Presidents Obama's goal to make all children college ready.

With a mix of human capital reforms, such as rounding out the teaching force with UCLA graduate students who have expertise in key subjects, added student learning and enrichment programs in and out of classroom, and a new focus on developing a college - going culture of high expectations, UCLA is setting out to take what is, by most measures, a struggling school and drastically improve academic outcomes for all students.

The Praxis II Subject Assessments measure knowledge of general and specific subjects related to K - 12 teaching skills and classroom knowledge.

Value - added measures are said to be confounded if they are subject to change because of students» socio - economic backgrounds or other student - level characteristics, and also if teachers who are equally effective have persistently different value - added scores because of the types of students they teach.

We also present qualitative evidence that loan - forgiveness recipients were of higher quality (as measured by value added) than nonrecipients who taught in the same subject but were not certified and thus ineligible.

At those schools, principals assigned teachers to teach what observations and statistical measures suggested were their strongest subjects.

And, just for fun, here's a more immediate example: Learning Goal: After reading this blog, teachers will understand that conative and cognitive skills can be taught through subject area knowledge, and goals and scales can be used to measure student progress, and improve instruction.