Not exact matches
They can «study» their religion, but it still comes down to
faith in the
teachings, and personal experience, neither of which can ever be meaningfully tested true or false in any kind of
objective way.
This I found disconcerting, since faithfulness to papal
teaching has always been one of my guiding
objectives when writing about the
faith.
Moreover, it must be remembered that the Gospels are the records of early Christian preaching and
teaching rather than attempts at
objective historical narrative and are thus more immediately valuable as sources for the
faith of the primitive church than for the biography of Jesus.
Faith does, to be sure, have an
objective content in the form of the truths that God has revealed, so there have to be dogmas and there has to be a
teaching authority.
NO such thing as
faith in Gods existance... the Bible
teaches KNOWLEDGE of His existance... and every places that refers to
faith refers to
faith in His Promises (see Hebrews 11) you try to limit to
objective knowledge as the only way thus living inside a closed mind and within a box
Good theological
teaching will therefore engage in «
objective analysis, discovery, and interpretation», but always in the context of the Christian
faith, so that the students discover that their own personal commitments are bound up with what they are studying.