Sentences with phrase «teach anything from»

They teach anything from clutch mastering to brake control, and more.

You can teach her anything from «stay» (don't bolt out the door) to «sit» (don't jump up on the visitors) to «off» (don't chew the furniture).

It's not uncommon to read about schools using titles like Portal 2, Minecraft, and SimCity to teach anything from high school physics to civic responsibility.

There's more than 2000 hours available to teach anything from elementary school to university, it's simple resource allocation.

Not exact matches

Please don't say that Tom Brady leading the Patriots back from 28 - 3 in the second half of the Super Bowl teaches you that you or anyone can overcome anything.

If the closure of the popular Google Reader service has taught us anything, it's that no program is safe from the search giant's chopping block.

Readers, have you learned anything from the teachings of Benjamin Graham in your evolution as an investor?

Daily physical therapy to rehab her knee, taught Lauren that with the right attitude and determination anything was possible, and from that point on fitness became a lifestyle.

Well, from kindergarten on we often teach science as a body of information not relevant to anything going on in the world.

Despite the fact that I once taught a course (one credit, for freshmen) on love, sex, and politics from Aristophanes to Bill Clinton, I wasn't going to say anything about Anthony Weiner's peccadillos.

Teaching from the pulpit, for example, that God willed Adam and Eve to sin, that cancer is predestined by God, that prayer doesn't cause anything to change in the world, and that evangelism has no purpose since sheep are sheep and goats are goats?

This guy wants to wage a holy war against anything he thinks is different from what the Archbishop of Pittsburgh teaches him.

Psychologists have taught us much about ourselves in ways that seem quite different from anything we learn from Jesus.

Likewise, I may never understand why an evangelical will not consider as evidence of a flaw in the Bible's teachings anything not also derived from the Bible.

Though Wolfe has been at great pains to assert that no one is supposed to learn anything from I Am Charlotte Simmons, permit this preacher and sometime campus pastor to say what it teaches me:

To those who quote sections of the Koran that say «slay the infidels» and think that this shows that Islam teaches violence, I say — those things are metaphors for resisting evil within oneself within one's own mind, resisting anything that turns one away from God.

I certainly did not get the idea from those verses of anything like total depravity or that fallen man had to experience any kind of supernatural transformation of the will / heart in order to be able to accept God's convicting / convincing / persuading / call / drawing, instructions, teachings, commands, promises and gifts.

So if what Jesus said to Philip can't be used to teach us about the nature and character of God because it's historical narrative, then this same argument applies to every text in the Bible, and you can also not use anything from the Law, the Writings, the Prophets, the Gospels, or the Epistles.

You don't know anything about the beyond except what you were taught from a book of folklore from the bronze age.

I also believe firmly that whatever God is like, whatever is spiritually true, it is NOT from hardly, if anything, that I was taught growing up (Catholic).

We all know that Adam is the first human created by The Almighty and then The Almighty taught Adam the names and everything he needed to know and then HE created his partner from him and then rest of us created from the mixing of sperm and ovam except Jesus who created from only mother who was virgin and this is sign for mankind that God can create anything, also the creation of Jesus is like the creation of Adam... how does it turns to what u saying dear brother Greg...

Christianity as we know it is evil and far removed from anything the Bible teaches.

«White theologians didn't say anything about lynching,» Cone said from his office at Union Theological Seminary in New York, where he teaches a course on Niebuhr.

Community members say they were «ready» on 9/11, for the prophets had taught them to mistrust claims that saving power comes from anything other than God.

These powerful emotions are enough to allow otherwise intelligent people to believe virtually anything put in front or, or taught to them, that they can somehow gain comfort from.

He truly did want to get saved that hour as he spoke — saved from preaching or teaching anything that might be in error.

Jeremy, It's apparent from my earlier comments that I don't believe there is anything sinful about a woman teaching scripture in any setting or a man learning from her.

They resemble a cult obsessed who worship power and mammon rather than anything taught from the bible.

As seen in earlier posts through numerous quotes from Calvinists, total inability teaches that mankind does not have a will to do anything other than sin.

Calvinists sometimes quote from Romans 7 as a text which teaches Total Depravity and total inability, for Paul seems to describe a lack of ability to do anything good (Romans 7:15, 19, 24), and refers to being captive and enslaved to sin (Romans 7:14, 23).

A church I attended for many years didn't quite go that far, but they forbid people from being part of the choir or teaching Sunday school or anything if they weren't current with their tithing.

We should ignore every New Testament teaching that does not come directly from Yehoshua, and that is anything that is contained in any of the books of the New Testament outside of the first five (the four Synoptic Gospels plus the Acts of the Apostles).

You had me till the last sentence «We should ignore every New Testament teaching that does not come directly from Yehoshua, and that is anything that is contained in any of the books of the New Testament outside of the first five (the four Synoptic Gospels plus the Acts of the Apostles).»

The number one thing people need to know about Osteen is that he is far removed from anything the Bible teaches.

And if someone's teaching or leadership is leading me away from the teachings of our Jesus, let alone away from cultivating the fruit of the Spirit's operation in my life — love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self - control — then I have to wonder if that teaching has anything to do with the Spirit to begin with.....?

So called «Christians», including the ones mentioned in this article are far removed from anything the Bible teaches.

To please Allah (GOD), we all have to believe in all the teachings of all Prophets from (Adam the final messenger Muhammad (PBUH)-RRB-, believe in all the revelations (the books) sent to them and do not compare them to GOD and associate them to GOD, be righteous, do good to people whether in your faith and religion or else other, do not harm anyone, do not kill anyone, be right and generous in all your doings, believe in Allah (SWT) and judgement day and hereafter, respect your elders and love your youngers, don't lie and don't do anything that Allah (SWT) has forbid you to do.

You know that I did not hold back from proclaiming to you anything that would be helpful, and from teaching you publicly and from house to house, testifying to both Jews and Greeks about repentance toward God and faith in our Lord Jesus.

If you were ever taught anything about how to pray, then how is that different from Catholics being taught the form of the rosary?

If one turns to sex education, the Church does not officially and substantially teach anything different from what it taught before the Council: that any information on that subject is virtually entirely the responsibility of the parents at the secondary age.

The first one to hammer out anything like a theology of the Christian faith was Paul, and curiously enough he appears never to have met the flesh and blood Jesus of Nazareth, let alone to have heard his teaching on the «Kingdom of God» direct from his lips.

It's pretty hard to teach or learn anything from posts like yours.

If we have learned anything from the dispensationalists» repeated warning of an imminent return of Christ that somehow never seems to occur, it is the folly of basing Christian doctrine on current events instead of clear scriptural teaching.

None the less, most «religious» people are far from representing anything their bible or such teach.

Second, I was raised in a very religious environment and turned away from that when I was 19, best thing I ever did for myself, but as for my children, I will not shield them from religion, but I will not teach it to them and force them to go to church or anything like that.

The fact that there are pessimistic and apocalyptic «minded Catholics does not prove anything about dispensationalism, but says much of the dangers of straying from the norms of Scripture, Tradition, and authoritative teaching.

People can choose to believe it, but that does not make it science and anything from it can not be legitimately taught as alternative theories of science, whether in astrophysics vs. the «big bang», biology vs. evolution or embryology, etc., or physics and geology in determining the age of the earth and universe.

Christ would not teach from the words of anything other than the Word of God.

«He who expects from me a teaching which is anything other than a pointing of this kind will always be disappointed,» writes Buber.

I don't think it's so much about the levites being paid for their service it's about us doing what's right toward Pastors that must feed and tend to the flock of GOD if GOD has called them.JESUS even said in luke 10:7 that the laborers are worthy of their wages.In luke 8 1 - 4 it's says even JESUS HIMSELF recieved financial support from the women who ministered to him with their possessions.Now most people today would say he should have been ashamed of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread out the grain was GOD talking about oxes no he was talking about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these things because of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLESS.