Sentences with phrase «teach anything of»

Not exact matches

As the stories of Okamura, Natori and Ganahl teach us, If you're willing to work hard and take action, anything is possible.

Hamilton began reading and watching anything she could get ahold of to teach her about the world of tech and venture capital.

Sure — it might mean spending a little bit of extra money to consult a lawyer but, if Delta's legal department has taught us anything, it's that it is always better to solve a problem before it morphs into a lawsuit.

But if our history of profligacy has taught us anything, it's that Canada can't afford to be complacent about the country's more than $ 500 - billion debt.

This ignores how differently each of us learns and pretends that a single instructor standing in front of a classroom full of kids can effectively teach anything to all of them at the same time.

Please don't say that Tom Brady leading the Patriots back from 28 - 3 in the second half of the Super Bowl teaches you that you or anyone can overcome anything.

Trump believes in that part of his economic agenda more than anything else, and if Gary Cohn's exit taught us anything it's that any adviser now needs to get with that program or get out.

If the rise in popularity of «millennial pink» has taught us anything, it's that everything is better in rose gold.

For those who have always been taught that swearing is a moral issue indicating some sort of personal fault, this study (and others like it attesting to the fact that swearing doesn't seem linked with anything too problematic) should be a nudge to reconsider.

If the closure of the popular Google Reader service has taught us anything, it's that no program is safe from the search giant's chopping block.

If world events of the last six or eight months have taught us anything, it's that experts are not always right in their predictions.

But if political events of 2016 have taught us anything, it is to expect the unexpected.

Readers, have you learned anything from the teachings of Benjamin Graham in your evolution as an investor?

I am extremely lucky to work in a job which causes me to be thanked countless times a day to which i have always replied with «no problem» or «no worries» and although my customers never seem to mind it drives me crazy mostly because I spent many years learning to speak and have spent many years teaching my children and think the constant use of one or two phrases over and over is limiting so just recently I have tried to use different phrases such as «your welcome» and «my pleasure» and anything else which springs to mind and is more suited to each scenario.

If the speculative bubbles and crashes across market history have taught us anything (particularly the repeated episodes of recklessness we've observed over the past two decades), it's this: regardless of the level of valuation at any point in time, we have to allow for the potential for investors to adopt a psychological preference toward risk - seeking speculation, and no amount of reason will dissuade them even when that speculation has already made a collapse inevitable over a longer horizon.

But if Climategate has taught us anything, it is that the power of the environmentalist argument rests entirely on its intellectual integrity.

«He's taught me to be more charitable and to never do anything in business, or life for that matter that you wouldn't want published on the front page of your local newspaper.»

As irresponsible as that was — leading to the death of a covert asset who had infiltrated a dangerous terror cell — it taught Failing POTUS one thing: he has the authority to declassify anything any time.

Well, from kindergarten on we often teach science as a body of information not relevant to anything going on in the world.

In 325AD, a bunch of churchmen came together and decided what should be in the bible, while tossing anything that contradicted what they wanted taught.

A tension arises between West's incredibly positive understanding of sex and the body and his teaching that sex in itself or anything else of this world, for that matter can never fully satisfy.

During this period, the key thing I was taught did not involve the biochemistry and molecular biology of my degree, but how to think critically and NEVER accpet anything as truth just becuase some PERSON told me it was true.

In fact, if there's anything on earth that unites the Church's adversaries — all of them except for the Muslims, anyway — the teaching against contraception is probably it.

To embrace such a system, as flawed as all human understanding is, without questioning it is certainly NOT reflective of anything Jesus ever taught.

While anything is possible it is not likely because of the types of language he used in his teachings.

In all honesty, would you vote for a man that was a former imam of a mosque that advocates converting everyone to Islam, and teaches that all adherents should do anything, including lie, to advance the aims of creating a global kingdom for Allah on earth?

The theory is not uncontroversial even among Muslims, many of whom believe that teaching anything other than the «substitution» model is tantamount to heresy.

I know ignorance makes people say stupid things but as many problems it has a solution: reading and learning!!!! Muslims will never say anything bad about the Holy Books or about the prophets because all of them are part of Islam and it's teachings.

And especially after the Noachian Flood, did false religion take a leap, with false religious doctrines and practices such as the trinity, immortality of the soul, that God torments people in a «hellfire», the establishment of a clergy class, the teaching of «personal salvation» as more important than the sanctification of God's name of Jehovah (Matt 6:9), the sitting in a church while a religious leader preaches a sermon, but the «flock» is not required to do anything more, except put money when the basket is passed.

Christians do not then force others to believe anything, but rather go to their homes as Jesus commanded his genuine disciples to do, seeking to discuss, reason and hopefully teach them about our Creator, Jehovah God and his kingdom, for Jesus said just before he ascended to heaven: «Go therefore and make disciples of people of all the nations... teaching them to observe all the things I have commanded you.»

If the 24 - hour news cycle has taught us anything, it's that one need not possess firsthand knowledge of a subject to orate upon it at great length.

Truth is, the only reason you've been taught faith is so important is that the creators of your religion know there is no evidence to support anything they want you to believe.

This guy wants to wage a holy war against anything he thinks is different from what the Archbishop of Pittsburgh teaches him.

On the other hand, it gave a basic signpost on the way: the great truths taught in scripture are indeed the way of salvation, and those entrusted with the teaching office in the church have no right to use that office to teach anything else.»

Wright criticizes Reformers for failing to stress «the great narrative of God, Israel, Jesus, and the world, coming forward into our own day and looking ahead to the eventual renewal of all things» so that their readings of the gospels «show little awareness of them as anything other than repositories of dominical teaching, concluding with the saving events of Good Friday and Easter but without integrating those events into the Kingdom - proclamation that preceded them.»

Have you written anything about your interpretation of Paul's teachings?

Likewise, I may never understand why an evangelical will not consider as evidence of a flaw in the Bible's teachings anything not also derived from the Bible.

If the history of Christianity has taught us anything it is its ability to assimilate culture, other religions and science into its dogmatic fold.

I want to ask them if they have read anything outside of the New Testament (Even then, you have the book of Revelation and various teachings on hell).

The statement continued, «Indeed, this is not about the church wanting to force anybody to do anything; it is instead about the federal government forcing the church — consisting of its faithful and all but a few of its institutions — to act against church teachings.»

That sounds like a tall order but, hey, if recent events have taught us anything, it's that there are a lot more Nazi sympathizers out there than most of us thought.

But the fact of the matter is that as powerful as science is, it has a long way to go before it can offer anything nearly as complete and practical and useful to the subjective lives of human beings as the teachings of the various world religions.

'' Once you remove man's dogmas and get back to the teachings of Jesus Christ» Which is one of man's dogmas... Men wrote the bible.You haven't removed anything, you have accepted one of man's dogmas as if it were truth.

He or she might agree with some of the Bible's teachings if those things line up with his view of life, but he or she doesn't accept anything just because «it's in the Bible.»

I don't see anything remotely wrong or uncoufe in this suggestion; to the contrary, I see it taught not only in scripture, but in the VAST majority of texts on human nature.

To those who quote sections of the Koran that say «slay the infidels» and think that this shows that Islam teaches violence, I say — those things are metaphors for resisting evil within oneself within one's own mind, resisting anything that turns one away from God.

Common sense is anything but common in a land where some churches teach you to hate people who are different than you, where the media blasts you with unfettered violence and when our schools have been gutted by the greed of those who don't wish to pay to educate the next generation.

In the end, if the Bible teaches us anything, it is that each one of us is loved by God not because of how right we are but because God graciously and mercifully accepts us, sometimes despite the positions we adopt.

I don't think what He spoke of though had anything to do with the Hell taught by most churches today.

But if the twentieth century's experiments in a brave new world have taught us anything, it is that attempts to institutionalize a revolution in global human solidarity have a way of repeating and amplifying the permanent problems of humanity.