However, the government insist that nurseries will still be able to
teach bible stories to children.
Not exact matches
Use the
bible for what it was intended, moral
stories of how people should act, although current societal norms would certainly preclude stoning and other current justice and civil rights departures from the rigid
teachings / interpretations of the
bible.
But I do not take what the
bible says word for word just more as a guide book /
story book that
teaches the good and bad.
Teaching children a
bible story as actual fact, instead of a religious representation, is just as ludicrious.
The
bible practically
teaches the 2nd law of thermodynamics in the «fall of man»
story.
Are you
teaching them that the
bible story of creation is not accurate?
The kind, loving god that is
taught in school is not portrayed in the
bible, neither are the
stories of the fall of satan.
If 100 years ago America had built an amusement park on public grounds and paid for its operation with tax dollars called «
Bible Land» that featured all the
bible stories and exemplified Christs
teachings we could say that amusement park was founded on Christian principles, It is a Christian amusement park.
However, the Association of Christian Teachers has described the move as a step too far, speaking on Premier's «News Hour», Chief Executive of ACT, Clive Ireson said: «from a Christian point of view they're aren't nurseries; of very many of them that would be
teaching it as a scientific fact during their science curriculam, they'll be
teaching it during their RE curriculam areas and those
bible stories like creationism need to be
taught during that time».
While I'll agree that much of the
bible is
stories and fables (Catholics don't typically view much of the old testament as hard fact, but as a way for God to
teach mankind right from wrong and ways to live), even some atheists follow the
teachings of Christ.
That most religions» «
bibles» have similar anecdotal
stories in them to try to
teach lessons and that some have been twisted in more modern translations to say things they didn't say before?
The Prodigal Son's Brother is not normally focused on, in most
bible teachings, but his part in this
story can
teach your children about forgiveness as well as being glad for others in the family.
This resource is a great way for you introduce a
bible story into your
teaching.
A problem could arise with biblical literalists, but one could address that by suggesting that some fictional
stories have great value in
teaching some lesson or illuminating some aspect of the «human (or other sentient being) condition», and also address actual historical events in the translation of the
bible — or one could be more abbrassive and ask «do you believe deaf people can't be saved» (see one of Paul's letters, and the history of the Catholic Church)-- oh, you don't — so when you said you were a literalist, you were speaking figuratively?»