Not exact matches
Such development of doctrine, typically in response to grave error and deviant traditions built upon such error, is to be understood not as an addition to the apostolic teaching contained in Holy Scripture but as Spirit - guided insight into the fullness of that teach
Such development of
doctrine, typically in response to grave error and deviant traditions built upon
such error, is to be understood not as an addition to the apostolic teaching contained in Holy Scripture but as Spirit - guided insight into the fullness of that teach
such error, is to be understood not as an addition to the apostolic
teaching contained in Holy Scripture but as Spirit - guided insight into the fullness of that
teaching.
1 Timothy 4:1 - 6 foretold exactly about the fact that false teachers would
teach about
such doctrines, among them, forbidding marriage and goes on to refer to
such teachings as
teachings of demons.
And especially after the Noachian Flood, did false religion take a leap, with false religious
doctrines and practices
such as the trinity, immortality of the soul, that God torments people in a «hellfire», the establishment of a clergy class, the
teaching of «personal salvation» as more important than the sanctification of God's name of Jehovah (Matt 6:9), the sitting in a church while a religious leader preaches a sermon, but the «flock» is not required to do anything more, except put money when the basket is passed.
I agree that the church keeps people away by
teaching wrong
doctrine such as hell being a place of everlasting torment - who wants to serve a God like that.
if u used to
teach such sadistic
doctrines I wonder why you won't run from your own shadow!
«Until we know the power of divine grace, we read in the Bible concerning eternal punishment, and we think it is too heavy and too hard, and we are apt to kick against it, and find out some heretic or other who
teaches us another
doctrine; but when the soul is really quickened by divine grace, and made to feel the weight of sin, it thinks the bottomless pit none too deep, and the punishment of hell none too severe for sin
such as it has committed.
The war of 1914 — in its effects on the Hapsburg Empire or on Germany's overseas possessions, for example — shook the very basis of
such «legitimist»
doctrine; and in a wider sense France and Britain should have the credit for the democratic ideas and the nationalist
teaching which are working to their detriment at the present day.
Further, Johnson defines «religious» as «pious; disposed to the duties of religion» and «
teaching religion,» with «to
teach» taking
such definitions as «to instruct; to inform» and «to deliver any
doctrine or art, or words to be learned.»
Andrew this
teaching of
doctrine of man is not a christian
doctrine but it came from Anchient greek philosophers
such as socretis and Plato and Aristotal.
1Ti 6:3 If any man
teach otherwise, and consent not to wholesome words, [even] the words of our Lord Jesus Christ, and to the
doctrine which is according to godliness; 1Ti 6:4 He is proud, knowing nothing, but doting about questions and strifes of words, whereof cometh envy, strife, railings, evil surmisings, 1Ti 6:5 Perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds, and destitute of the truth, supposing that gain is godliness: from
such withdraw thyself.
Were there no
such thing as inspiration, Christianity would be true, and all its essential
doctrines would be credibly witnessed to us in the generally trustworthy reports of the
teaching of our Lord and of His authoritative agents in founding the Church, preserved in the writings of the apostles and their first followers....
Brunner appeals explicitly to the prologue of John and to certain sayings of Paul, but surely one who is as emphatic as he in rejecting the authority of Scriptural
teachings as
such does not mean to say that we accept the
doctrine of creation because of the presence of these passages in the New Testament.
But the Christian scientist as
such in his own sphere is bound as a matter of principle and method by the Church's magisterium as the higher and more comprehensive authority, in the sense that even as a scientist he may not affirm as established with certainty by his science something which would involve a definite contradiction of a
doctrine taught officially by the Church as certain (Denzinger 1656, 1674 ff., 1681, 2085).
But later in the book Woodworth forthrightly asserts that, «as it pertained to the foundational
teaching of Christianity,
such rigid stasis was entirely good, for at the heart of the Christian religion are certain basic truths and
doctrines that do not change.»
Not having
such a theology of inspiration and interpretation, when Enns is wrestling with the concept of a historical Adam he strays from the
doctrine of original sin, which
teaches that original sin is passed on by generation, and allowsfor an interpretation that «all have sinned» through imitation or accident or, worse still, because we were created that way.
Our and «All» Creations ever being created by God, a name above all mannerisms to - be-named
such as Jehova or Elohim or any other name calling and / or labellings other then the most simplstic and of God should all be stricken from all peoples» minds and
doctrines and
teachings!
An extreme type of democratic
doctrine teaches that governors are responsible only to the people they govern or to the majority of
such people.
Why is it that you break so many of God's commandments, yet hold the traditions of your fathers in
such high regards, that you
teach them as
doctrine?»
Here's another, scarcely less oratorical in character, from the Congregation for the
Doctrine of the Faith: the title of this document (another wonderful example of Vatican bogus academic language when what is needed is a competent journalist used to writing informative headlines) is «Considerations regarding proposals to give legal recognition to unions between homosexual persons» (2003): The Church's
teaching on marriage and on the complementarity of the sexes reiterates a truth that is evident to right reason and recognised as
such by all the major cultures of the world.
99 % of what people complain about in
Doctrine, is really merely discipline -
Doctrine taught incorrectly or in
such a way that it can't be understood.
Can you disagree with the Church's
teachings on core
doctrines such as justification and still be a Catholic in good standing?
Mark, the Scientia Media and Monlinism: scientia media was a ky term used in the theology of Luis de Molina (1535 - 1600) Jesuits, later on instructed using variants of his
teaching, by
such persons as: Robert Bellarmine, Leonard Lessius, Francisco Suarez, and Gabriel Vasquez, which attempted to resolve the apparent conflict between the
doctrines of grace and free will.
We summarize some learning theories that suggest that
such exercises likely succeed in
teaching analytical and writing
doctrine.
One can not help wondering whether those who
teach such a monstrous
doctrine ever read any English themselves.»
And though the task may be a delicate one and a difficult one, it will be the duty of the court in
such cases, when the
doctrine to be
taught or the form of worship to be used is definitely and clearly laid down, to inquire whether the party accused of violating the trust is holding or
teaching a different
doctrine, or using a form of worship which is so far variant as to defeat the declared objects of the trust.