Sentences with phrase «teach evolution as»

You have been challenged to provide the name of a single university or college that does not teach evolution as part of their biology curriculum.

mama - Today public schools teach evolution as a means to species as fact, even though science knows from the Global geological record and Dr. Gould's work that species occur rapidly followin a mass extinction; in violation of the same seperation claus.

These are the same folks that teach evolution as a means to species, a notional hypothesis that is false.

ALL university and colleges in Europe teach evolution as a fundamental component of biology.

Again, ALL university and colleges in the USA with tertiary level biology classes teach evolution as a fundamental component of biology.

It is vital that every young person receives a broad and balanced education including teaching evolution as the only evidence - based view of how life came to be.»

I mean, there is no question that the scientific community is very strongly on the side of teaching evolution as an accepted and valid scientific explanation.

Textbook challenge: A Nassau County resident files a challenge to a science textbook, saying the district should «no longer purchase books teaching evolution as proven scientific fact or books that present evolution as proven fact.»

Not exact matches

Readers, have you learned anything from the teachings of Benjamin Graham in your evolution as an investor?

And in this episode of the podcast, you will hear from Tony and Ray as they discuss the evolution of Ray's career, the catastrophic mistakes he made that almost destroyed everything he built, and how the lowest points in his life taught him his biggest lessons.

Science has a ton of assumptions and we need to make sure we are also teaching our kids that aspect, evolution (as it pertains to we came from apes) has many flaws and unanswered questions and shouldn't be taught as scientific fact!

Evolution is taught as a scientific theory, as it should be.

but not taught as fact and right after science class where they learn Darwin's theory of evolution, watch videos on the big bang theory, have a field trip where they meet up with an archeologist to uncover one of our ancestors remains that weren't as evolved, learn how old the earth truely is etc.....

(i) a woman's right to choose; (ii) teaching evolution in school; (iii) medical immunization of teen girls against HPV; (iv) assisted suicide; (v) gay marriage; (vi) my right to view art and theatre deemed «offensive,» «blasphemous» or «obscene» by theists (vii) basic $ ex education for older school children; (viii) treating drug abuse as principally a medical issue; (xi) population control; (x) buying alcohol on a Sunday; (xi) use of condoms and other contraceptives (xii) stem cell research.

9 — Actually many Christians believe in evolution, but evolution is still a theory, but we teach it as fact in school.

If you want to be blind to reality, I'm fine with that, as long as you don't try to put those blinders on public school kids (my Catholic school taught that evolution was a scientific fact, btw).

It is the same with evolution, there is no proof, only a therory that is being taught as truth.

On March 11, 2002 during a panel discussion on evolution Meyer publicly told the Ohio Board of Education that the «Santorum Amendment» was part of the Education Bill, and therefore that the State of Ohio was required to teach alternative theories to evolution as part of its biology curriculum.

@KatMat: your analogy would begin approaching realism if: — during the pledge of allegiance kids were forced to say «one nation under The Orioles» — our nation's currency said «In Dallas Cowboys We Trust» — if millions were slaughtered, tortured and burned to death because they weren't fans of The Pittsburgh Penguins — if NASCAR fans endlessly attempted to have Intelligent Car Driving taught beside Evolution in science class as a possible explanation for how mankind developed — if «the 5 D's» of Dodgeball (Dodge, Duck, Dip, Dive, Dodge) were constantly attempted to be made into law so everyone would live by the same ridiculous notions, even if those notions knowingly discriminate — if nutters constantly claimed America was founded on the principles of Darts, even though our country SPECIFICALLY calls for a separation between Darts and State because the founders knew the inherent dangers of Darts becoming government instead of staying in the realm of sport where it belongs

(9) The researching and teaching of evolution has had a secular bias as well, since science has been carried on largely in a secular context as a secular enterprise, in relation to which religious affirmations (such as creation) are seen as quaint and superfluous.

(2) Evolution has often been taught with the implication that it was a rejection of the biblical creation account, by ignoring or dismissing the creation stories as prescientific myths surpassed by superior modern versions.

Later at Haverford, by wonderful luck, I had a course on evolution by a young man whose name I forget who skillfully taught the theory as then understood (1916).

Many people have been taught the theory of evolution as the method by which we got the world as we now see it.

«all teaching of evolution must go as there is no proof» First, science doesn't deal in «proof», except mathematics and logic.

Evolution is still just a theory, yet taught everyday as being proven when it has not.

@maff, svs's comment isn't dismissing that some morals are taught in childhood, but the essential and core morals such as refraining from violence is a product of the evolution of the human race.

As a medical professional, one would think you'd understand that biological evolution, much like general relativity, quantum mechanics, the germ theory of disease, cell theory, plate tectonic theory, etc is a scientific theory and should be taught in science class based on the preponderance of evidence that backs it.

Evolution is taught in school as it should — but other theories should at least be mentioned as well to open a dialogue and inspire kids to think for themselves.

My point was that evolution should be taught as a theory and in relation to the theory of how we exist — other theories should be mentioned to open a dialogue amongst the students.

All these parents who insist on teaching «creationism» to their kids as «science», while downplaying (or completely / hiding denying) the tangible bona fide evidence of evolution... I sometimes have to wonder why they don't simply feed lead paint to their kids and get it over with.

Your comment indicates that you don't understand evolution and would have benefited from more teaching on the subject as a child.

However teaching creationism in public schools as a scientific reality on the order of evolution damages kid's critical thinking.

Anyone who watches his shows (which I like but as a christian I follow creationism) knows he teaches evolution heavily.

Fine but if you're going to teach creationism alongside evolution, then it must be presented as «just an idea... just a concept that ancient civilizations with no scientific background developed in a one - answer - fits - all, fill - in - the - gaps manner.

Gods will is for us humans today to evolved to a level of conciousness that will prepare us for the challenges of our future survival, Scientists now predicts of hardships in the future due to over population and changes to the natural environment.and that is happening now with activists through out the world are reminding us of protecting nature.That is why we need a phsychological revolution to hasten the evolution of consciousness that will address the problems.Ideological and philosophical enlightenment had the past great minds to develop ideas and belief because God sent them to reality in their times.Abraham, Jesus, Mohammad, Buddha, and many other religious leaders to teach humanity the doctrines that God willed to be appropriate and applicable in those periods of their existence, Also great philosophers in another dimension of social involvement were born to interprete and connect philosophically as the second element of our conscience, Kant, Marx and countless of them also were born.To complete the triangular structure or dimension of our conscience is knowledge.

E.g., in regards to scientific support for evolution and rejection of creationism and the young earth dogma, in 1986, 72 US Nobel Prize winners, 17 state academies of science and 7 other scientific societies, signed an amicus curiae brief asking the US Supreme Court in Edwards v. Aguillard to reject a Louisiana state law requiring the teaching of creationism, which the brief described as embodying religious dogma.

Beecher called evolution «the teaching of the divine method of creation as gradual.»

Until now the aim has been to see clearly from the positive declarations of the teaching Church what a Catholic scientist may or may not say as a Christian in the matter of evolution.

I am not as high profile as you but if I were, it would be like me telling you not to teach your kids about evolution or the big bang theory.

It's interesting how the «theory» of evolution is taught as if it is «fact».

Chad, it would be a step in the right direction if they taught theistic evolution as long as there is no interventionist design.

Let us be united in making sure evolution is taught as a fact.

What these legislators and their religious supporters don't understand is this: Evolution is not controversial within scientific circles, and so it should not be taught as controversial in science classrooms.

@Polergiest: «As a result, science spends most of it's time defending major theories like evolution instead of teaching them, because»

Perhaps your claim is true, but like the big bang and the notion that evolution is a means to species, there is no place in our public schools for teaching religion as science.

Of course Atheists and Agnostics impose their beliefs on religious folk — its called Evolution and its taught as absolute fact throughout most of the world.

In short, I think our goal should be to have biology and evolution taught in a way that points to what we don't know as well as what we do.

So it is objectionable that in our schools the origin of species (as distinct from intra-species evolution) is taught dogmatically as a «fact» that Darwin and modern geneticists have firmly established beyond dispute.

You might as well disband most Catholic schools a swell, since most of them definitely teach that evolution is a valid theory.

where to start... you have IDers wanting that taught along side evolution as if that puedo - science would stand up in school, you have religious folks attacking the schools over different parts of the curriculum.