Sentences with phrase «teach me things only»

Not exact matches

Not only does it make my life easier, but teaching her to take care of herself and her things will — we hope — help her be more independent and self - sufficient as she grows up.

I once got into a very polite conversation — tour guides don't argue with guests — with a nice but unyielding tourist who said, «You have to go into teaching because that's the only thing to do with a history major.»

Curiosity, creativity, and the view that that giant moving box is an impenetrable fortress are only a few of the things kids can teach us.

The only thing I would go back and teach myself is experience, which is something you can't teach.

Whether it is Al - Qaida or Economics, we can not understand either because since the 1930 the only thing we have been teaching in our schools is Keynesian Socialism.

Warren Buffett is not the only octogenarian who has shown that it's never too late to teach the youngins a thing or two.

They tell you what Jesus taught, what he said, all the things that right - wing conservative «Christians» (in name only) ignore completely.

If only we had the RELIGIOUS POLICE like in Iran... they'd beat some sense into these atheists and teach them a thing or two about the god of love!

They only thing we can do is teach our kids to hit the deck when they hear the gunshots start to ring out — and then maybe hide or run for the nearest exit if it's close.

i do nt care if you do nt beleive in god or my religion, but one thing about my religion is it teaches respect, to whatever your beliefs are teaches ignorance thats the difference between me and you i care for others to were you only care about yourself without the reprecussions of the future

So, not only do we think you're an idiot for actually believing in a magical, all - powerful, invisible man who lives in the sky and demands things of you, we think you're an idiot for turning your back on the teachings of this magical, all - powerful, invisible man who lives in the sky.

Just a few would be teaching things either not in the Bible or are anti-Biblical... veneration of Mary... praying to a priest when 2 Timothy clearly says there's only one mediator between man and God (Christ Jesus)... the Pope... indulgences... and the biggest difference is works righteousness (infused vs. imputed righteousness).

All religions teach that same thing; only the gods change.

«Teaching people, starting with our children, that there is a God to whom they're accountable is not the only thing we need to do to end gun violence, but it's the first thing we need to do,» he said.

Only living persons are to be baptized, for just before Jesus ascension to heaven, he gave the command to his eleven faithful apostles: «Go therefore and make disciples of people of all the nations, baptizing them... teaching then to observe all the things I have commanded you.»

I was feeling extremely discouraged last night, since the newest church I went to seemed to be the «one», only now every time the one pastor talks my spirit literally cringes at some of the things he teaches.

The only thing that reliably works is teaching your son to stand up for himself.

So we not only pay close attention to theologians like John Wesley and Jonathan Edwards, but also to John Calvin and Martin Luther, and we even resonate with many things taught by Catherine of Siena, Thomas Aquinas, and Gregory of Nyssa.

The only thing they care about is whether the church teaches eternal security or not.

Multiculturalism teaches us to approach the sacred things of others with respect, but we can do this only if we ourselves are not estranged from the sacred, from God.

While I agree that the Bible doesn't teach that God's blueprint is for a one - pastor system only, I know that God can still use a church with just one pastor, as there is no such thing as a perfect church, and God obviously uses hundreds of churches all over the world to spread His Word, and to serve others.

My point being that taking a member of the set of all things Jesus never explicitly taught on and positing, if only by implication, that his silence is an endorsement of that thing is not a valid foundation for making a sound argument.

For one thing Evolution is not proven... It is still considered a theory... It should be removed because it is not science but only a theory... Evolution is the stupidest thing taught today and should be removed...

Most young people do know that the Church teaches, for example, that abortion is wrong (sometimes it's about the only thing they do know about the Catholic Church!)

In his encyclical letter on the importance of St. Thomas» work, Pope Leo also alluded to the Church's need to maintain a deep study of science: «When the Scholastics, following the teaching of the Holy Fathers, everywhere taught throughout their anthropology that the human understanding can only rise to the knowledge of immaterial things by things of sense, nothing could be more useful for the philosopher than to investigate carefully the secrets of Nature, and to be conversant, long and laboriously, with the study of physical science.»

Teaching and learning these things make for truly theological schooling only when they are done in the service of a further end: learning so to love God with the mind as to come to understand God more deeply and more truly.

Unfortunately, both of these books are pointless because 90 % of people do nt use the books for the good teachings, only how we need to destroy and create havoc because another group does nt believe in the same thing we do..

He was definitely a nonconformist in a lot of ways (the things he said and taught were pretty radical), though he was also the biggest conformist in all of history if you think about him being the only person to perfectly abide by the law and conform to the pattern of humanity as God originally intended.

That while the birth, life, and ministry of Jesus truly were filled with wise teachings and miraculous events, such things were only myths in the life of Caesar.

My God offers us only good things and does not push us into bad things to teach us a lesson.

Jesus may be a great teacher, and he may atone for our sins, but his teaching and suffering are of decisive significance only because he is the Lord who comes «to unite all things,... things in heaven and things on earth» (Eph 1:10).

Not sure about the Allah thing, but you're correct that Mormons teach that they and only they are embryonic gods.

5) The Church only has itself to blame — we have far too often taught such a watered down, wet version of the Bible that anytime a hint of the real thing surfaces, cries of «that's not nice» echo through the echo chambers.

This included, among other things, teachings on the «only means of salvation provided for mankind in Christ,» and «the distinct offices of the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost.»

Aside from being really uncomfortable because - I was not only being forced to be there - I was there for pot when everyone else was there for things like meth and heroine, I found a lot of what they taught and practiced to be very cult - like.

Having said that, we don't «need» a pastor or bible teacher, we don't even «need» the bible, we only need Christ's Holy Spirit; as John said, «the anointing which you received from Him abides in you, and you have no need for anyone to teach you; but as His anointing teaches you about all things.»

Based upon the absolute belief in the primacy of the spirit, it taught that only spirit is truly real; consequently such things as evil and pain really do not exist.

I only meant: if my teaching on grace doesn't raise the same sort of objections — is it the same thing Paul taught?

Their move to a Catholic church was taken as meaning only one thing: that despite the lip - service being paid by the diocese to the teaching that «non-celibate gay people should not be given Communion», the diocese of Westminster was in fact giving its tacit approval and support to a situation in which that was precisely what was happening, in a setting in which the Pope and the teaching of the Church were regarded with hostility and held up to contempt.

He does all these miracles, provides all this food, gives all these Biblical teachings, and the only thing some people can do is complain and criticize that He is not doing the right things.

Their children would be Americans, and they did not teach us the German that had been their own first language but which they now spoke only when they wanted to keep things from us.

All of us who care about peacemaking and alternatives to a nuclear holocaust — those of us who still believe that God loves the world God created and expects us to do all we can to preserve and enhance life on earth — have a responsibility to pay attention not only to what these preachers are saying but also to what our own tradition teaches about «the last things.

«O God, who didst teach the hearts of Thy faithful people by sending to them the light of Thy Holy Spirit: Grant us by the same Spirit to have a right judgment in all things, and evermore to rejoice in His holy comfort...» This is great rhetoric because it roots the life of the moment in the grace of the past; it evokes a response in depth because it is not only a report, but a reverberation.

It's one thing to choose not to believe in God or not consider Jesus Christ being the only way to heaven, but to insult and attack His teachings or His followers in any way only makes the Bible prove its point.

If the only thing anyone ever does is strictly conform to what has been taught, there will be no growth.

I can not tell you how many times I have been accused by other Christians of teaching easy - believism because I teach that the only thing one has to do to receive eternal life is believe in Jesus for it.

People are taught to only be kind, and selfless during Christmas as if it's some kind of excuse, in many TV shows, or even maybe from people you know, you hear things like «well since it is Christmas,»

(Well, one thing that «turns out» is that the only constitutional law Obama actually taught at the University of Chicago was the equal protection clause.

Calvin did not shy away from the consequences of this teaching, namely, that the same God who is the author and fountain of every good thing in Jesus Christ created the bulk of humanity only to have them fall in Adam unto their eternal condemnation and destruction.

The kid is right in a way Religion is a way to enslave people to the thinking of that particular religion Jesus didn't come to form religion but to give us a way to get to Heaven through him The only mission of a church is to teach you about God's love to help the poor to love one another to do things that Christ would do There is a penalty for not being saved by the blood of Jesus There will be a separation from God for all eternity God made us for one reason to love Him the Creator of all The meaning of life