Sentences with phrase «teach reading well»

We must do a much better job of preparing teachers to teach reading well.

The rationale for the instructional mandate echoes Paige's: if few schools are teaching reading well and there are approaches that are known to be effective, why not require all schools to use them?

Not exact matches

Why it's a must read: The One Minute Manager, along with The Greatest Salesman in the World, is the best of the «teach through parables» style of business book.

But if you're goal is to hone your brain with a good book, what you want is the title that will teach you the most with the quickest, most enjoyable read.

«We go to school and are taught reading, writing and arithmetic for [however many] hours a day and then taught that getting a good grade is better than getting a bad grade.»

He's totally self - taught, reading a book a day and recommending the best ones in his popular online book club.

In August of 2011, I started my blog with the aim of teaching people how to save money as well as journaling my personal finance journey after reading a magazine that featured a personal finance website in one of their articles.

Best - selling author John Mauldin's new book teaches you how to read the direction of the market, so you can make decisions that capitalize on today's investment opportunities.

I wanted to thank you for your initiative that you have taken to teach all of us all about investing, Safal Niveshak is a very good initiative and not to forget that you are providing us all this awesome post day after day week after week at no extra cost and without any advertisement, Frankly I would not mind if you put some ads on your blog I would be more than happy to read your blog even with adds.

They work in soup kitchens, care for abandoned babies, teach adults how to read, treat the sick, and do countless other good works, for which they receive almost no recognition and very little pay.

Their generation has something to teach ours; the best way to begin to learn is to begin to read.

well, the New Testament is wonderful to read and learn from and Jesus in the Bible teaches how to get eternal life, life after death.

And Jesus answers, a. blessed are you, you read that in a good book b. blessed are you, you really listened in church c. blessed are you, you learned this from God not human teaching.

I also believe that for many of us who look to the teachings of Christ for spiritual guidance that we would do well to find more time in our crazy lives to read and ponder His words (myself included).

Does it help it fit better with what we read in the teachings of Jesus and the writings of Paul?

Wright criticizes Reformers for failing to stress «the great narrative of God, Israel, Jesus, and the world, coming forward into our own day and looking ahead to the eventual renewal of all things» so that their readings of the gospels «show little awareness of them as anything other than repositories of dominical teaching, concluding with the saving events of Good Friday and Easter but without integrating those events into the Kingdom - proclamation that preceded them.»

Given these happy parallels between Jesus» teachings and our best modern sensitivities and insights, why is it that a careful reading of Jesus ethical instructions does not leave us feeling justified?

I guess christians are so well versed at doublethink and can read the bible and believe in all its teaching in the blink of an eye, this is childs play, right?

Some of the best Bible scholars of the past and present never would teach or preach on any book of the Bible until they had read it through at least 60 or 100 times.

Sorry about the tangents, but it's always a great point in a post to quote the great Thoreau, I think he captures the heart of what I desire in all humanity: «A truly good book teaches me better than to read it.

For example, if a denomination declared in their doctrinal statement that the Bible teaches that all good Christians must wear pink hats and only those people who wear pink hats can indeed be true followers of Jesus, we would conclude upon reading this statement that we would never be accepted by those folks because we don't agree with this bit of ridiculous theology.

I say «well maybe» because so much of the teaching about sola fide comes out of a certain reformation reading of Galatians Romans and Phillipians.

The reason for this, I'm convinced, is that new faculty — though very smart and well read (and probably better educated than most of their senior colleagues), though religiously observant and already experienced in teaching, though flexible, open and good - humored — have not found a vocation, do not know what purpose they want to serve.

While I appreciate the approach that DTS teaches, it can really only be followed by expert scholars and theologians, and is not feasible for the average student of Scripture, which indicates to me that it is not the only oven the best way of reading and interpreting the biblical text.

Looks like it's going to be a good read I'm excited to be able to read this book I just recently read your book atonement of God and loved it I've also listen to your teachings on Genesis love that very much especially episode 43 when you talk about the voice of God in the garden that was so wonderful.

In preparing to teach a course, I looked through a folder of accumulated notes and realized that I first taught the course to an adult class consisting of three women: Jennifer, a widow of about 60 years of age with an eighth - grade schooling, whose primary occupations were keeping a brood of chickens and a goat and watching the soaps on television; Penny, 55, an army wife who treated her retired military husband and her teenage son and daughter as items of furniture in her antiseptic house, dusting them off and placing them in positions that would show them off to her best advantage, and then getting upset when they didn't stay where she put them — she was, as you can imagine, in a perpetual state of upset; and Brenda, married, mother of two teenage sons, a timid, shy, introverted hypochondriac who read her frequently updated diagnoses and prescriptions from about a dozen doctors as horoscopes — the scriptures by which she lived.

If our critical readings lead us away from trusting the grace of God in Jesus Christ, then something is amiss, and we would do well to interrogate the methods and presuppositions that have taught us to distance ourselves arrogantly or fearfully from the text and to miss scripture's gracious word of promise.

Thus we should read Thomas Aquinas not because the Summa Theologica is a classic, but because reading Aquinas teaches us how better to read Augustine and the scriptures.

Well, grab the bible, read it, and think on about what your reading... and compare the message of the Christ with the religions that you see around you and ask yourself... Is this religion teaching this?

For centuries Mark had been the least read and regarded of the four gospels for the very reason that both Matthew and Luke contained most of its material, and had the further advantages of better styles and much additional information on the teaching and life of Jesus.

When they teach, they are there to teach, and you better have your thinking cap on because they will challenge the way you read Scripture and live life.

Reading the teachings of Jesus and studying early Church history shows - Christians were Socialists in the best possible way.

Marcus could read and write — though he could not write well, and had no inclinations to authorship, even in that publishing center of the western Mediterranean in the days of Nero — and so, as one of the few in the local congregation of Christians who could both read and write, he was commissioned to put together in his free time — probably late evenings, after the assembly of the Christians had broken up — the fragmentary translations of narratives from the story of Jesus and his teaching which were in circulation in the Roman church.

Though I own nearly 10,000 books, read Greek and Hebrew in my study, and can use theological terms with the best of theologians, people often say that my teaching is easy to understand, helps them with their questions, and provides guidance for practical Christian living in this world.

I have read and studied just enough of the other viewpoints to know that what I was taught in Bible College and Seminary might not be the best understanding.

Read, study and meditate on Scripture every day, and make sure you get as much good, solid, Biblical teaching as you can during the week.

Now a transient place full of hipsters, bond traders, and actors, as well as actors and hipsters who are the children of bond traders, all searching for an «authentic» place to replace the Midwestern suburbs and rural towns they came to Brooklyn to escape, Brooklyn for me will always be Flatbush Avenue and Rudy Giuliani, Bernie (Goetz, not Madoff), and Ed Koch, block parties, radios murmuring Yankees games on back porches (all of us too poor to afford air conditioning, which kept us outside in that great urbanist semi-public space), the blackout of 1977 and the blizzard of 1995, Mickey Rivers and Bucky Dent, not to mention the wild cast of characters appearing in the Daily News, a paper that practically taught me to read.

When I read between the lines of the New Testament, I see, along with the good, a very chaotic community that struggled with the same issues the contemporary church struggles with: ambition, power, position, money, possessions, charismata and worship, order, heresy, dress, the abuse of the sacraments, teaching, and so on.

Is it possible and after reading about it i kept on thinking «i will sell to my soul for 20 carats get out shut up i will never ever sell my soul to you oh god please help me and this is continuing for a few days i am afraid that i have sold my sold to the devil have i please help and still i think god's way of allowing others to hate him us much worse even you know and can easily think think about much better punishments like rebirth after being punished for all the sins in life and i am feeling put on the sin of those who committed the unforgiviable sin (the early 0th century priests) imagine them burning in hell fire till now for 2000 years hopelessly screaming to god for help i can't belive the mercy of god are they forgiven even though commiting this sin keans going to hell for entinity thank you and congralutions i think the 7 year tribulation periodvis over in 18th century the great commect shooting and in 19th century the sun became dark for a day and moon was not visible on the earth but now satun has the domination over me those who don't belive in jesus crist i used to belive in him but now after knowing a lot in science it is getting harharder to belive in him even though i know that he exsists and i only belived in him not that he died for me in the cross and also not for eternal life and i still sin as much as i used to before but only a little reduced and i didn't accept satan as my master but what can i do because those who knowingly sin a lot and don't belive in jesus christ has to accept satan as their master because he only teaches us that even though he is evil he gives us complete freedom but thr followers of jesus and god only have freedom because they can sin only with in a limit and no more but recive their reward after their life in heaven but the followers of satun have to go to hell butbi don't want to go to hell and be ruled by the cruel tryant but still why didn't god destroy satun long way before and i think it was also Adam and eve's fault also they could have blamed satan and could have also get their punishment reduced but they didn't and today we are seeing the result

And while I have learned quite a bit from my reading in these sources and still use quite a bit of those insights in my own teaching and writing, I have also read from various alternative perspectives on the Jewishness of Jesus, and have come to believe that these other perspectives have slightly better arguments and stronger positions.

A man who everybody says is a good teacher, but in all honesty, when you read His teachings, most of them don't make much sense.

The medieval monks of Ireland, Thomas Cahill has famously argued (see reading list below), saved Western civilization by their work in building libraries and teaching people to read well.

For urging we follow the well read teachings of the Founder of the Church, Jesus, as chronicled by his companion apostles, Matthew, Mark, Luke & John in their Gospels?

REALITY I'm appalled that u read all this on de Historical Jesus but it did nt teach u a little about de Parable of de GOOD SAMARITAN.

@NP, I'm not well versed or well read in Barth, so I could be WAY off base on the guy's teachings.

Anybody who reads the new testament knows that the teachings of Jesus are incompatible with Ayn Rand, as well as incompatible with pure capitalism itself.

Some well - respected evangelical scholars think this means Paul did not permit a woman of that particular community to teach and dominate a man for selfish gain resulting in licentiousness (see recommended reading).

If you don't take the Bible at face value, then look to men like Polycarp, Clement, and Ignatius who were taught by the Apostles, and read as much as you can about these men as well as what they themselves wrote.

If you read the red letters where Jesus talks to Nic about being born again you get a better concept of The Master trying to teach the clergy about spiritual awakening.

I have grown up thinking (and taught for years and years) that regular Bible reading is more important than a good diet and exercise.