If by «shove down your throats» you mean «
teach supported scientific theory» then yes we do want to shove evolution down your throat.
Not exact matches
Nearly every
scientific society, representing hundreds of thousands of scientists, have issued statements rejecting intelligent design and a peti.tion
supporting the
teaching of evolutionary biology was endorsed by 72 US Nobel Prize winners.
E.g., in regards to
scientific support for evolution and rejection of creationism and the young earth dogma, in 1986, 72 US Nobel Prize winners, 17 state academies of science and 7 other
scientific societies, signed an amicus curiae brief asking the US Supreme Court in Edwards v. Aguillard to reject a Louisiana state law requiring the
teaching of creationism, which the brief described as embodying religious dogma.
Comparing the
teaching of one of the best scrutinized and accepted (and best
supported by evidence)
scientific theories to selling a product known to cause cancer is actually quite funny.
You honestly believe that you have
scientific proof that the most widely accepted explanation for biological diversity in the World, which is
supported by overwhelming evidence in the Worldwide fossil record, completely independently verified and validated by genetic mapping and
taught in every college and University in the World — is wrong.
Another question: why is it that, more than a century and a half since Darwin's theory (and it's still
taught world - wide as an unproven theory) has the evidence increasingly pointed away from him, not in
support of him», is utterly and quite refutably wrong by an abundance of verifiable
scientific evidence.
At New Legacy, language arts and social studies are combined into integrated theme - based humanities courses; math is
taught in a blended environment that enables teachers to effectively
support and challenge a diverse group of learners; and science is
taught in six - week modules that focus on
scientific inquiry and the
scientific process.
Giving new mothers «instruction about techniques (latching, making sure the baby is swallowing rather than just nipple sucking),
teaching them to feed on demand rather than on a schedule, and
support for mothers who have problems» breast - feeding are the steps that have the strongest
scientific support.
The
scientific method: We welcome the
support for
teaching the
scientific method in the aims, and the presence of the «Working scientifically» sections — especially now they have been integrated throughout all the other sections.
But the responsibilities come with benefits: money to
support a
scientific group, and joint
teaching and research assistants to share the task of preparing and marking assignments.
People will enter knowing, Freeman proposes, that when their
support ends in a few years, the also - rans must leave academic research and move on to other types of work, preferably using their
scientific knowledge, in industry, government, patent law, science policy, high - school or community college
teaching or other fields.
From hosting a webinar series on the use of specific
scientific methods to
support human rights research, to the development of
teaching materials to integrate human rights into STEM curricula, from assessing the extent to which marginalized populations are represented in STEM fields, to cultivating a human rights interest group within a member organization, there are many ways in which Coalition members can further the mission of the Coalition within their communities, organizations and in collaboration with others.
The Society publishes the latest developments in leading
scientific journals The Journal of Physiology, Experimental Physiology and Physiological Reports, and
supports those working in the field by organising world - class
scientific meetings and offering grants for research and
teaching.
In the same way that creationists urge schools to «
teach the controversy,» climate change skeptics aim to sow doubt about
scientific consensus, said Mark McCaffrey, the programs and policy director of the National Center for Science Education, a nonprofit that has long
supported the
teaching of evolution in schools and recently began to defend climate change education.
The
Scientific Assistant is a strong part of our team, she provides teachers with a range of
support and ideas in our collaborative, planning and
teaching processes.
There are exceptional teachers, but we need to
support the professional development of all teachers, and we can do so if we invest in the
scientific base of the
teaching profession and empower those very exceptional teachers to become leaders who inspire other teachers.
To
support and promote
scientific evidence - based research that will advance understanding of the theory and evidence underlying effective
teaching practice for students with learning difficulties.
However, the reasons they provided to
support the contention that
teaching about models is important had little to do with models being central to the
scientific endeavor.
This article presents efforts to
support prospective secondary science teachers in learning and
teaching about
scientific models and the impact of those efforts on their understandings.
Educational reforms, i.e. what, and how we
teach, are fully
supported by teacher unions, provided the content and methodology come from
scientific education research.
It was not a major focus for Democrats, but it would have been a small win had an amendment offered by Sen. Ed Markey (D - MA) providing for a competitive grant program to
support the development of materials that would
teach the
scientific evidence of climate change, passed.
Using technology to
support prospective science teachers in learning and
teaching about
scientific models.
«We are making this change after years of concern about the lack of
scientific evidence to
support the current practice of annual vaccination and the increasing documentation that over-vaccinating has been associated with harmful side effects,» said the announcement of a new vaccination protocol at the Colorado State University Veterinary
Teaching Hospital.
Climate Consensus and «Misinformation»: a Rejoinder to «Agnotology,
Scientific Consensus, and the
Teaching and Learning of Climate Change» decisively rejects suggestions by Cook and others that those who say few scientists explicitly
support the supposedly near - unanimous climate consensus are misinforming and misleading the public.
What I was
taught to look for, what I have tried to find for my whole
scientific career, and what I will still go on loooking for, is empirical data to
support any particular
scientific idea.
(2) thou shalt not fudge the data (3) thou shalt not invent arbitrary statistical methods to suit thy data (4) thou shalt not indulge in any form of bias e.g. thou shalt not employ incomplete, highly selective, subjective literature reviews (6) in the interests of transparency and replication thou shalt not hide the data or code (7) thou shalt not make vague or exaggerated statements unsupported by evidence (8) thou shalt not tolerate actual or potential conflicts of interest (9) thou shalt not allow political interference to compromise
scientific integrity (10) thou shalt not use unvalidated computer models (11) Thy university shall insulate undergraduate fees from research expenses and require research to be self
supporting independent of the
teaching.