Sentences with phrase «teach the problem of»

Ideal as a starter activity when teaching the problem of evil but you could also use it when teaching about crime and sin too.

A variety of activities used to teach the problem of evil including: taboo cards as a revision activity, a worksheet about the types of evil, two information sheets which students read and come up with their own definitions of natural and moral evil and finally a card sort and template which pupils use to construct the argument.

As a result of these observations and discussions with teachers they determined that the key teaching problem of practice was that teachers needed to better teach the vocabulary and the processes for students to engage in effective mathematical discourse.

And I would like to teach the problems of selective breeding through my English course.

Not exact matches

When it comes to blood tests, which is what Cuban referred to specifically, Dr. Aaron E. Carroll explains at The Incidental Economist that at the Indiana University School of Medicine, he teaches «residents and medical students never, ever to order blood tests unless they are looking for a specific problem.»

One of the most important lessons experience teaches you in SEO is how to troubleshoot problems, and only a veteran — or a team of professionals working together — will be able to do so effectively.

Sure — it might mean spending a little bit of extra money to consult a lawyer but, if Delta's legal department has taught us anything, it's that it is always better to solve a problem before it morphs into a lawsuit.

Holberton was announced last month as a project - based school that aims to teach the software - engineers - of - the - future how to attack problems and how to think using a project - based format, rather than traditional degree work.

I feel that Americans are often taught to not burden others with problems, but I can not imagine going through this without the support of my community.

A former computer - game addict with chronic lateness problems, he pruned distractions from his workspace effectively enough to enable him to write this book on top of his teaching duties.

Instead, we're teaching those students that we still think of schools as industrial - style factories with a premium on rote memorization and repetition rather than rigorous reasoning and problem solving.

Experience teaches the problem - solving, people management and leadership skills that apply to all areas of business.

Maybe, but Danae Ringelmann, founder of Indiegogo, taught us that to ensure success in entrepreneurship, focus on solving your own problems.

Part of the problem is an assumption that we need to teach introverts to, at least, mimic crowd - pleasing behaviour in order to be successful leaders.

«This company is filled with incredibly smart individuals and leaders, all of whom teach me something new every day — how to be a better manager, a better problem solver, a better recruiter, a better motivator.»

I am extremely lucky to work in a job which causes me to be thanked countless times a day to which i have always replied with «no problem» or «no worries» and although my customers never seem to mind it drives me crazy mostly because I spent many years learning to speak and have spent many years teaching my children and think the constant use of one or two phrases over and over is limiting so just recently I have tried to use different phrases such as «your welcome» and «my pleasure» and anything else which springs to mind and is more suited to each scenario.

Insightful content that drives controversy, elaborates on ideas, solves problems or teaches valuable skills strengthens credentials and fuels the image of being an expert in the industry.

While the example of Richard Dennis and the «turtles» was a good example of the fact that trading can indeed be taught, there is a problem with learning a strict set of trading rules.

As long as the mythical language of the BIble is left as myth and not taught as fact, there's no problem.

He taught generations of managers the importance of picking the best people, of focusing on opportunities and not problems, of getting on the same side of the desk as your customer, of the need to understand your competitive advantages, and to continue to refine them.

While it was once true that most testing of potential new drugs took place in medical schools and teaching hospitals, that is no longer the case, and in Elliott's view the change has given rise to serious problems and abuses.

While I agree wholeheartedly that we all have a responsibility to each other to love one another and not intentionally lead one another down destructive or unhealthy paths, there are at least three glaring problems with this line of teaching and thinking:

And to be clear, Oh Brother: I have no problem with a criticism of how science is taught.

Christians have the problem of not understanding that everything Jesus preached Buddha had already taught in the East 400 YEARS Earlier.

A number of people that have written to respond to this article have spoken of the interpretation of the Bible, which is the number one problem in this present world as the Bible itself teaches us that no prophecy of scripture is of any private interpretation (2 Peter 1:20).

The biggest problem with Muslims are that they are not following teachings of the prophet and setting up good examples of Islam to others.

As if it wasn't bad enough for man to try to run his affairs independently of God and His standards, it has been made even worse by religion teaching us that all our problems are actually blessings from God.

God's reason for this Testament is to fix the problem of one bible, yet hundreds of Christian churches on earth teaching their own version of that one bible.

That being said, legalism, absolutes beyond basic issues, problems with universalizing Bible historical times issues to today, misinterpretation of things past to things future (dispensationalism good example) all are rooted in being so locked into the Bible and one groups teaching of that Bible, over another.

I am for the elimination of hate, fear and control, religion is just the catalyst that people use to hate, fear and control, getting rid of religion won't solve the problem, its like putting a band aid on a severe cut, its temporary, and it just hits the surface, instead we need to go deeper than that to the root cause, I know lots of religious people who don't hate, fear or control, there are also many beliefs such as paganism, Buddism, Taoism, which doesn't use hate fear, and self righteousness to condemn others, I think if maybe more of the most major religions followed there teachings then we wouldn't have as much problems as we do.

Christianity isn't a very moral system to follow, it teaches great divide and has been (and still is) at the root of many problems in this world.

I have some serious problems with some fundamental theological beliefs taught by Martin Luther, but I also appreciate his many brilliant spiritual insights, not the least of which is «Where God builds a church the devil builds a chapel.»

The problem is that a lot of young people don't agree with the political implications of evangelical Christian teachings.

I know ignorance makes people say stupid things but as many problems it has a solution: reading and learning!!!! Muslims will never say anything bad about the Holy Books or about the prophets because all of them are part of Islam and it's teachings.

For the Indian scriptural tradition, although there is no explicit literary teaching as to whether or not brahman is dynamic, there is the affirmation that it is the key to the problem of the one and the many.

Furthermore, although Christians teach you can repent at any time right up to the moment of your death and still be saved, there are two problems with this.

All these movements, in their various ways, responded to a fundamental problem in the teaching and practice of the Lutheran state churches: Subordination to the state had impaired the church's ability to perform the Office of the Keys.

My week at the Duke Summer Institute taught me lament Unlearn innocence Unlearn speed (fixing things) Unlearn distance Unlearn easy consolation Attending to wounds, listening Going to Ramah, presence I am part of the problem

But the biggest problem, as I saw it, was that those teaching this view of «biblical womanhood» refused to acknowledge that their interpretation — like all interpretations — involved a certain degree of selectivity and required a certain set of presuppositions.

In fact, I have tried to keep silent on certain issues over the years, but the problem, or maybe I should say the benefit, of teaching through books of the Bible the way I do, is that I can not avoid certain issues for long.

But there are numerous problems with thinking that doctrinal statements and membership classes can keep false teaching out of the church.

The problem is, you can't run a church as a business, and also follow the teachings of Jesus.

And not just Jesus: A whole gospel in all of its theological details — right down to debates about baptism, the relationship of law to grace, and the problem of divine foreknowledge — is taught to the people of the New World centuries before Jesus was even born.

Not only did the exigencies of the life of the first Christians, with the problems they had to face, occasion the handing on of the tales and the teaching, and to a large degree determine how the tales and the teaching were to be communicated.

Or am I contributing to the problem by helping support this institution - one that has some amazing people but are dedicated to teaching students more about how evolution is wrong than in following the call of Jesus to love your enemies.

Biblicism falls apart, Smith says, because of the «the problem of pervasive interpretive pluralism,» for «even among presumably well - intentioned readers — including many evangelical biblicists — the Bible, after their very best efforts to understand it, says and teaches very different things about most significant topics... It becomes beside the point to assert a text to be solely authoritative or inerrant, for instance, when, lo and behold, it gives rise to a host of many divergent teachings on important matters.»

And it also teaches females to put males first, above their own interests and the interests of other women, and that's a problem.

With proper teaching by actual Catholic teachers, or teachers instructed on Catholic doctrine, none of this presents a problem.

One other point about sex: I wonder if part of the problem is that the church has a tendency to teach people the importance of virginity, but not chastity.

The problem is not with the teaching of the Church, but might it be with the way the Church has taught in recent decades?