Sentences with phrase «teach to others what»

Not exact matches

Make sure you've really learned what you think you have learned and that the information is truly stuck in your memory by trying to teach it to others.

You can start by learning the basics and hosting educational sessions to teach others what they need to know to get started in import / export.

He teaches his clients to achieve what he calls a «beautiful state» — in other words, a perennially peaceful mood.

Then teach what you know to others.

Anxiety is part of your life and others can't simply understand you; you need to teach to them what you learned.

«We have taught conservatives for many years to trust nothing other than what they hear in conservative media.

Finally, those with experience and knowledge in accounting will also qualify to teach others what they know.

I would very much like to do this strategy and I saw that in your blog you have other articles on links bild, I'll take a look, because your tips seem very interesting to practice, I will understand what you are teaching.

This article breaks down the debate and teaches you how to really evaluate rankings, and what other metrics provide valuable insight into the success of your SEO campaign.

You have to decide whether or not you want to be an example for others to live by, or a bad example to teach others what to avoid in life.

He was also «responsible» for other trading products as well as seminars and the German banker secret site where he «teaches normal traders how to make (what he claims) extraordinary profits».

It teaches you the value of what Canada has to offer the world and what Canadians have to offer each other.

«I have a passion to teach and what better way to contribute what I have learned from my personal experience and from the IT industry then teaching other people.

I taught kids confidence — to believe in themselves, to stand up for what's right and for others.»

In 1994, after becoming financially free, I was searching for a way to teach others what my rich dad had taught me.

Jason; so sorry you were so misled but the Bible refers to the earth as a circle (Isa.40: 22) some 700 years before Jesus ever came here and many other descriptions of what goes on here are so accurate as to make one wonder how man would know and if you are sincerely interested in finding what the bible really teaches (and having those misconceptions corrected) just ask and I will be glad to help or go to jw.org for all the free help you will ever need.

I'm sorry Pastor Evans but I think those «Christians» who abuse what Jesus stood for and his teachings to shove them down the throats of others and / or use them for political gain who do Jesus quite the disservice.

If your faith is so weak as to not be able to tolerate those with different perspectives, may I suggest that you re-examine what your faith actually teaches about loving others?

«I've been in education for more than 30 years, and we teach our students to do what you can to help other people, don't just think about yourselves, so that's what I wanted to do,» said Sister Margret.

That is what religion is about, teaching people to be generous to others, feed the sick or hurt or homeless, treating others like you want to be treated, being honest, kind, loving, and generous.

In other words they are taught, no matter what faith or non-faith, that it is your right to say dumb things and that they will die defending that right.

For another thing, thank goodness there are people like him to teach other people how to tell the rest of us what we're supposed to be thinking and feeling and talking about when our time comes.

True we are an organization made up of imperfect people who make mistakes but we really do try to live and teach others what God's Word the Bible says.

If Christians compromise on this teaching — which every Christian church held to be essential until 11:58 on the clock of history — the world will ask what other beliefs they will muffle when under duress.

His followers that force people to believe what they do even though they do everything Jesus Christ taught them to do... Do you turn the other cheek???? Do you?

We can point to scriptures that should help others realize that their actions are contrary to what Jesus taught.

Fact is many men who are in leadership or positions of power in Church, business, entertainment, sports, etc., feel it is their unilateral right to have access to sluts, regardless of what the Bible says or any other moral teachings.

Now as a Christian I follow the new testament, and so striving to be Christ like as a Christian I accept everyone for who they are, I love them and do not presume to know the right way for them to live their life, instead I simply open my arms to others and know that all people of all faiths are just fine it doesn't matter to me what you do with your life all that matters is the way that you do it... that was my understanding of christs teachings anyways

Allowing terror and injustice to flourish unchecked is not something the Bible teaches and this lost Scribe is educated enough to know better, but is apparently too intoxicated by his spiritual pride to discern the difference between what Jesus tought about forgiveness, on one hand, and what he demonstrated and taught about actively confronting and battling evil, on the other.

The fact is if you believe the words of God and the teachings of Jesus, this practice is an abomination and nothing that anyone can do to make it pretty, nice, sweet, loving or any other thing to make it acceptable can override what the Lord says about it.

For other examples of what the Bible really teaches go to jw.org or have a serious discussion with us when we come to your door.

They all had the same idea to exclude something or other or include someone or something different than what they were originally taught.

Actually, there's more evidence that Paul was warning his Thessalonian converts not to listen to other gospels, which most likely means not listening to missionaries representing what his rivals, like Peter, were teaching.

In other words, they will not teach as Catholic theology what is contrary to the Church's teaching.

But now I say unto you, report those who disagree with you to the church or denominational authorities, label them heretics or say that they raise «red flags» and let everyone know not to listen to them, criticize their positions without ever going to them personally to find out what they actually believe and are teaching, align them with other «heretics» without ever researching their books, writings, and messages, and above all, side with your friends against them even if you personally have never been hurt or offended by them.

That will teach you not to assume what other people believe when you don't know them.

The majority of christians have no idea about their faith or what it is to be christian, you see them spout nonsense from a bible they have never read and judge or even hate others who do not believe their beliefs, all the while not knowing they are going against its teachings.

I'd post this question to you — let's say you're born into a mormon family, or a jewish family, or a muslim family, or any other of the hundreds of religions on this planet, and you believe what your parents are taught.

«You can continue teaching Semitic languages which you enjoy, or you can act on what you know — that we have saved your life over the years, and we can save the lives of others as well if you chose to teach them about us.»

What is less clear to me is why complementarians like Keller insist that that 1 Timothy 2:12 is a part of biblical womanhood, but Acts 2 is not; why the presence of twelve male disciples implies restrictions on female leadership, but the presence of the apostle Junia is inconsequential; why the Greco - Roman household codes represent God's ideal familial structure for husbands and wives, but not for slaves and masters; why the apostle Paul's instructions to Timothy about Ephesian women teaching in the church are universally applicable, but his instructions to Corinthian women regarding head coverings are culturally conditioned (even though Paul uses the same line of argumentation — appealing the creation narrative — to support both); why the poetry of Proverbs 31 is often applied prescriptively and other poetry is not; why Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob represent the supremecy of male leadership while Deborah and Huldah and Miriam are mere exceptions to the rule; why «wives submit to your husbands» carries more weight than «submit one to another»; why the laws of the Old Testament are treated as irrelevant in one moment, but important enough to display in public courthouses and schools the next; why a feminist reading of the text represents a capitulation to culture but a reading that turns an ancient Near Eastern text into an apologetic for the post-Industrial Revolution nuclear family is not; why the curse of Genesis 3 has the final word on gender relationships rather than the new creation that began at the resurrection.

Have we been so moved by Jesus» teachings (and our «belief» in him) that we have been propelled to change our lives, what we buy, how we talk to others, and to serve the poor?

Indeed, given what Christianity teaches about charity, human sinfulness, and God's grace, being a Christian may make Benedict or any other Christian far less likely to be fanatical than the atheist.

What is needed, however, so as to reassure the Eastern Orthodox is some mechanism whereby a pope who departs from Tradition by teaching error, or what may be construed as error, can be inhibited by a form of ecclesiastical enquiry or trial — as is the case with any other bishop in the ChuWhat is needed, however, so as to reassure the Eastern Orthodox is some mechanism whereby a pope who departs from Tradition by teaching error, or what may be construed as error, can be inhibited by a form of ecclesiastical enquiry or trial — as is the case with any other bishop in the Chuwhat may be construed as error, can be inhibited by a form of ecclesiastical enquiry or trial — as is the case with any other bishop in the Church.

I've been reading the monastics recently, and it strikes me that while much of modern evangelicalism echoes their teachings on self - control and self - denial when it comes to sexuality, we tend to gloss over a lot what this great cloud of monastic witnesses has to say about self - control and self - denial in other areas of life — like materialism, food, relationships, and hospitality.

I was amazed that anyone could think we believe that fossils are «put there by God to test our faith» and wondered what other nonsense our children might be taught at school.

But because this truth is beyond or beneath the level at which science and morality operate, and because in its nature it liberates from bondage to any particular formulations, we are quite free to be open to what others have to teach us at these secondary levels.

But frankly, all the pastors ought to be doing in the first place is being a servant and a slave to others — that's what a pastor is anyway, at least what sketchy little bits of «pastor» roles can be made out in the NT, as it's scarcely mentioned — not necessarily standing up there and teaching everyone two or three times a week, running the show, and acting like some kind of CEO.

It is a mistake to use the pulpit for what we might describe as didactic purposes, however important and necessary the task of teaching may be in other connections.

You mention Colossians 2:16 - 17 and say that Paul teaches us not to condemn others about what they eat or drink or the feasts that they observe, but that is not at all what Paul is saying.

But Mathison is right that it is impossible (and unwise) to study the Bible all by itself, without reference to what others in the community of Christianity have learned and taught in our own day and throughout history.