Sentences with phrase «teach well enough»

Ultimately all kindergarten and elementary school teachers should be trained to teach well enough so that prevention effectively occurs in the course of normal schooling.

PSHE education is currently a «non-statutory» school curriculum subject and Ofsted estimates that 40 per cent of schools are not yet teaching it well enough.

From their perspective, it's not that they aren't teaching well enough; it's that the students — whom they care about — aren't very smart, are lazy, or come from dysfunctional families.

Not exact matches

My hope was that if it taught me something about how to raise money, that would be good enough,» says Bergman, co-founder and CEO of Choremonster, which has developed an app to reward kids for helping out around the house.

Sure enough, they all confirmed that interests outside of work have taught them critical skills and made them better leaders.

The Bible teaches that only Christ's work on the cross is good enough and that people's works «are as fil.thy rags»... we aren't good people and don't do good works.

The discipline of place teaches that it is more than enough to care skillfully and lovingly for oneâ $ ™ s own little circle, and this is the model for the good life, not the limitless jurisdiction of the ego, granted by a doctrine of choice, that is ever seeking its own fulfillment, pleasure, and satiation.

So at the end of the day, even as a follower of the teachings of Jesus Christ (the name Christian has been so stained, refuse to call myself one to distance myself from traitors to God like Bush and just about every Conservative American), I'd vote for an astheist with good ideas and was brave enough to push for the interests of people, not corporations, then I would vote for them.

Allowing terror and injustice to flourish unchecked is not something the Bible teaches and this lost Scribe is educated enough to know better, but is apparently too intoxicated by his spiritual pride to discern the difference between what Jesus tought about forgiveness, on one hand, and what he demonstrated and taught about actively confronting and battling evil, on the other.

He taught that being convinced that God loves you is enough to make you do good things for others which will get you salvation.

If you know christianity well enough to teach it, there is no way you could actually believe in it.

He apparently doesn't comprehend the Gospel clearly enough to teach it, or maybe he thinks he has something better?

The word doctrine is therefore being used in a way that is flexible enough to accommodate the variety of biblical teaching on these and other subjects as well as the factor of development in some themes as we move from the Old Testament into the New Testament.

@US Patriot If a person follows the teachings of Jesus to his best ability, maybe even without knowing about Jesus, I think only God can judge whether he is Christian enough, but I don't mind you disagreeing on that point.

The last thing they'd go for help is a christian and few desperate enough find good Christians who'd taught them the truth but most gets something different entirely.

Modern - day so - called christians have been good at twisting facts, now they can not even be bold and honest enough to revert to the true teaching of their religion.

I have read and studied just enough of the other viewpoints to know that what I was taught in Bible College and Seminary might not be the best understanding.

Additionally, the «teach that your religion is better than another person's,»... Well as a person who had to take a women's study and leisure class and also a psychology class taught by a known feminist, I will report to you there is enough «I am better than you» just within the same classes.

No rule can be final and complete; plainly enough, as the poet wrote, «new occasions teach new duties,» while «time makes ancient good uncouth.»

But it seems to me that, if we want a «core» around which to build our understanding of the Redemption, we can not do better than to start with Jesus» own teaching as recorded by St. John, and see the Cross as the revelation of God's love, a revelation powerful enough to bring us the re-creating Love it reveals, a revelation that is applied to us in the Sacraments and especially in the HolyEucharist.

It has never been good enough to worship together each Sunday and teach the beliefs of the church to the faithful and trust that the faithful will either do the right thing or face the consequences in the hereafter.

The Rector of the new University already knew Martin well; Staupitz had persuaded Dr Trutvetter a reliable man who had had enough, after twenty - five years, of the difficulties always generated in such a Complex ancient foundation as Erfurt was, to come over to teach at Wittenberg.

On your last sentence, by the understanding of the teachings of jesus, none of these so called disciples are good enough for all show a peity low wanting of love from jesus towards themselves more so then the next man... lust!

The Pharisees kept looking for the Kingdom of God, and they felt that if they could teach the people to be good enough, then God would establish his kingdom in Jerusalem and everyone would be safe.

103:13, G),» or in Jesus» teaching, «So if you, as bad as you are, know enough to give your children what is good, how much more surely will your Father in heaven give the Holy Spirit to those who ask him for it (Luke 11:13, G).»

Creating some space in your schedule to bring your kids along for the journey of shopping (or better yet, picking - if you are fortunate enough to have a veggie garden) and being involved in some kitchen creations can be a real source of joy for little ones, and a great time to teach them about the origins of their food.

Also they are going to be running training camps to help teach the Kenyans how to play the «Arsenal way» and they are ambitiously aiming to get a team good enough to reach the World Cup Finals.

he'll leave with the attitude of «nobody is good enough to replace me so I wan't Steve Bould because I taught him everything»

Wengers tactic is to get the players intelligent enough that they can adapt to any situation in the moment and deal with things by teaching them to be better footballers and not just drill a set role into them.

I came on the site to teach so I'm going to start doing it look at all arsenal player Individually what are they good at we can find players in the league lower team who can shoot Pass control on are bette header of the ball than our arsenal player what that issaying that they are not good enough no one wants to hear it but the the English player are the weak link no fight no determination even player with less ability do more than some ofour player we will go no where with Ramsey Wilshire gibbs ox.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Along comprehensive article, well composed and well informed and very well argued, HOWEVER I will say what Ive been saying for months and that's this Welbeck is NEVER gonna be any better than he is now he's not got an eye for finish, he's not ruthless enough when pulling the trigger and that's instinct and not something that can be taught, he's not good enough now and he never will be.

He knew that if he failed this time, if he didn't play well enough on the Penn Circuit to get back up to the Grand Prix, it meant that he would turn out like his father: teaching country - club ladies in dainty dresses, lying to them that their backhands looked improved....

You should also try teaching him how to make his best meal if he is old enough to cook.

but if enough real food advocates step up and say «does it really make sense to serve candy and soda at an elementary school function» or «can we encourage parents to send non-food treats for bday celebrations» or better yet, «can you do what you do best and help my child learn to like fresh produce just like you taught him to read?»

I guess a husband in a wheelchair and a wife whose sole income is from teaching is just not «good enough» to raise someone's baby.

I think it's so important that we don't accidentally teach our kids that they need rewards to know they are valuable, accepted, good enough, etc..

And home schooling gives you enough time and interaction to really teach social skills well.

and I know you well enough to know that is not what you're teaching your daughter... in fact I know you're teaching her the opposite, simply by the way you are trying to live your life and parent your daughter.

«baby bunching bests Main baby bunching benefit: if you wait long enough, they will teach themselves»

You and your partner have decided that you are ready — or desperate enough — to try to teach your baby good sleeping habits.

I'm trying my best to live a green life, pursue greater health and well - being for my family and the planet, and teach my children well enough so they can grow up and be anything they want to be.

In addition to all of the items on that list, getting enough sleep allows you to be your best for your babies, and will help you to teach them how to get good quality, restful sleep.

When you spend enough time with them, and have a good enough relationship with them, you can teach them your spirituality, morals, how to live well, etc..

It's what they deserve, it's what we owe them, to teach them to speak well enough to get along in the world.

In other words, it's great to teach kids where food comes from, but is it really enough to help guide them into making good food decisions on a lifelong basis, when there are so many societal forces pushing against that outcome?

But are we doing a good enough job teaching them self - love?

I also teach parents about the concept of «good enough» mothering - we don't need to be perfect, we just need to be good enough.

Right now it is a safe assumption that 99 % of them don't; you will have to understand well enough to be able to teach others.

And we need to take enough time to teach them the how - tos as well as to expect independence with the jobs.