Sentences with phrase «teach you new ones»

But you can also encourage more senior employees to actively teach newer ones.

Hook them with clear words they know; teach them new ones inside.

Just five minutes a day reminds him of lessons he already knows, teaches new ones, and wears out that mile - a-minute brain so he doesn't go in search of trouble.

If your dog is able to still do tricks, teach her some new ones.

Also, it's a lot more difficult to untrain your puppy from repeating an old behavior than to teach him a new one.

They may set up individualized training plans to strengthen an employee's existing skills or teach new ones.

Not exact matches

The new one bills seven female keynote speakers out of 23 total, including Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen; Jane McGonigal, a game designer; and Reshma Saujani, founder of Girls Who Code, a non-profit organization that teaches software development to women.

The initiative is intended to teach small businesses how to use Facebook to generate new customers, retain existing ones and build an online community through things like buying display ads targeting specific markets as well as other cost - free measures.

Entrepreneur met with Tollin in his New York City apartment to discuss the life and leadership lessons he learned following these men, and what the process of working on a quarter century - long project taught him about creativity, focus and the pursuit of one's true passion.

Showing a group of locals around the bunker late one night, museum guide Irina Chereponko says the museum «tries to teach the new generation not to repeat the mistakes of the past.»

When you join a coding bootcamp you are entering into a life - changing experience, one that will teach you new technical skills and provide you with a community of current students, alumni and hiring partners who all share similar values and perspectives on learning.

After one year of teaching, she moved to New York City to pursue other opportunities.

Teach Your Mouse New Tricks Your mouse's scroll wheel can be handy, but it's a one - trick animal.

To keep the lights on, Corcoran ends up mortgaging her country house, selling her one - bedroom co-op, and teaching real - estate courses at New York University and Marymount Manhattan College.

One of the missing facts in Darcy's report is that while conservatives with big microphones taught their listeners not to believe what is reported in the mainstream media (and especially the elite press in New York and Washington) they themselves still relied on those sources as their baseline reality — minus the liberal «spin,» of course.

One of the issues that came up is whether the new lexicon of entrepreneurial ideas — Customer Development, Business Model Design, Lean, Lean LaunchPad class, etc. — replace all the tools and classes that are currently being taught in entrepreneurship curriculums and business schools.

Melissa: I was introduced to Pure Barre in January 2015 by one of my best friends who just began teaching Pure Barre at a brand new studio in the bay area.

The institutional church is so often like Satan... longing to be worshipped and obeyed; teaching that obedience to one scripture is more important than balancing them all; luring us to abuse our power to make a difficult path chosen by God into a simple solution of no new spiritual growth (Matt 4).

In the past few decades they have gone from what I was taught to a new type of God — from a loving God to one that we should fear.

With Easter, all that has been obscure about his life, his teaching, his works and his fate becomes radiantly clear: this Risen One is the «first - born among many brethren» (Romans 8:29); he is the new Temple (Revelation 21:22); and by embracing him we enter the dwelling place of God among us (Revelation 21:3).

Rather, the new NIV here makes it possible for English readers to discover a more Catholic or Orthodox or truly Lutheran Paul, one who teaches that the problem with the Jewish law is its ethnic and temporary character and that human salvation concerns our real sacramental participation in divine life, real transformation, and ultimate resurrection.

Get rid of Old Testament and New Testament departments and teach the Bible as one book, centered on Jesus.

I was feeling extremely discouraged last night, since the newest church I went to seemed to be the «one», only now every time the one pastor talks my spirit literally cringes at some of the things he teaches.

Baha'is believe that there is one God, and that when people corrupt the religion God has given them, or are in need of further guidance or new social teachings as the time requires, a new prophet comes to renew their commitment to Him.

Then came the sermon, which was based on one of the most important passages of the New Testament, the one where Jesus teaches at the synagogue in Nazareth and explains exactly what his ministry is all about:

What is less clear to me is why complementarians like Keller insist that that 1 Timothy 2:12 is a part of biblical womanhood, but Acts 2 is not; why the presence of twelve male disciples implies restrictions on female leadership, but the presence of the apostle Junia is inconsequential; why the Greco - Roman household codes represent God's ideal familial structure for husbands and wives, but not for slaves and masters; why the apostle Paul's instructions to Timothy about Ephesian women teaching in the church are universally applicable, but his instructions to Corinthian women regarding head coverings are culturally conditioned (even though Paul uses the same line of argumentation — appealing the creation narrative — to support both); why the poetry of Proverbs 31 is often applied prescriptively and other poetry is not; why Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob represent the supremecy of male leadership while Deborah and Huldah and Miriam are mere exceptions to the rule; why «wives submit to your husbands» carries more weight than «submit one to another»; why the laws of the Old Testament are treated as irrelevant in one moment, but important enough to display in public courthouses and schools the next; why a feminist reading of the text represents a capitulation to culture but a reading that turns an ancient Near Eastern text into an apologetic for the post-Industrial Revolution nuclear family is not; why the curse of Genesis 3 has the final word on gender relationships rather than the new creation that began at the resurrection.

Ephesians 5:21 - 33's teaching on marriage is about changing that view of marriage to one of unity and love — the kind of love that could transform the authority - subordinate nature of first - century Ephesian marriages, into what God desires for marriage in the New Covenant: oneness, companionship and mutuality.

Rabbi Neuberger asserted that «it's really important that one accepts that... new scientific research has taught us... that the human embryo is not as unique as we thought before... We do have to think differently about the «unique quality of human embryos» in the way that Peter Saunders is saying... The miracle of creation... may have to be explained somewhat differently... Our human brains are given to us by God... to better the life of other human beings... and if this technology can do it..., and I don't believe that anybody is going to research beyond fourteen days, then so be it, lets do it.»

These squirrels taught me that when a door is closed, sometimes you just have to chew a new one.

He was active early in the second century CE and is well known for having posited not one but two Gods, one represented in the Old Testament and seen as responsible for the world's creation, the other encountered only in the New Testament in the teaching of Jesus and specifically in the theology of Paul.

And the book also offers a deliberately wide array of approaches to trinitarian issues, including not only historical and systematic theologians, but biblical scholars and analytic philosophers of religion, writing from a variety of theological and communal points of view» Roman Catholic, Protestant, and, in one case, Jewish (the New Testament scholar Alan Segal, who contributes an instructive if somewhat technical chapter on the role of conflicts between Jews and Christians in the emergence of early trinitarian teaching).

It is not a decision for everyone, but one that is perfect for her, as she prepares for her new life teaching dogmatic theology.

In other words, a new reason must be created, one which corresponds with the teachings of faith.

Does Webb really believe that such teaching from one supposedly chosen by God to lead his Church «does not significantly damage or deface» the portrait of Christ in the New Testament?

But a couple of bona fide scholars — not professors teaching religious studies in universities but scholars nonetheless, and at least one of them with a Ph.D. in the field of New Testament — have taken this position and written about it.

At one point in history, it was a great way to reach the community for Jesus and teach and train these new believers about Jesus.

(KJV James 1:27) In one of his final opportunities to teach his disciples in his mortal ministry the Savior said this «A new commandment I give unto you, That ye love one another; as I have loved you, that ye also love one another.

When I read the New Testament and see what Christ does, I see an empathetic, loving teacher who taught that the greatest commandment is to love one another.

«The newer teaching supersede the older ones.»

It seems that when we look at the overall teaching and instruction of Jesus, and then also that of the early church, the new Way of Jesus can be summarized by one word: Love.

For one reason, his own interest was so centered in the new life in Christ through our Lord's death, resurrection, and living presence as the Spirit, that he did not focus attention on the details of Jesus» life and teaching.

I don't think these are new ideas, but hark back to the foundation of Christ's teaching: Love one another.

... yeah suzy and others... I just happen to realize that when monkey devolving didn't quite work out on paper it all changed to single cells and from the slime off of the worlds garbage can and so on... I just happen to know more than you think... In another ten or twenty years the science books will all have a new teaching... the Bible has been around and hasn't changed one word in over two thousnad years..

No one questions the words that Plato wrote, no one says «I doubt Plato really said that,» yet Plato was in existance around 400BC doing his teachings, but the earliest copies of Platos writings that we have in our possesion are from 900AD... that's a 1300 year gap as opposed to the New Testaments 25 - 30 year gap... That speaks for something, I believe.

Anyone who has studied the New Testament knows that NO ONE who wrote in that text taught or espoused what happened in Norway.

I was never one to believe in a secret rapture before the tribulation... that's a new teaching since 1860.

One of the misconceptions about New World slavery that Stark is eager to correct is the role of the Catholic Church and Catholic teaching.

No one is trying to teach the new grammar to the old folks of the general public but only the new grammar is being taught in the schools.

Brunner appeals explicitly to the prologue of John and to certain sayings of Paul, but surely one who is as emphatic as he in rejecting the authority of Scriptural teachings as such does not mean to say that we accept the doctrine of creation because of the presence of these passages in the New Testament.

In one aspect they are addressed to all and sundry, laying down the lines of an absolute ethic determined by the coming of the kingdom of God; but insofar as individuals accept them as such, and commit themselves, the new Israel is being formed, and the ethical teaching of Jesus becomes the new law by which it is to be governed.