Sentences with phrase «teach you that man does»

This is the kind of masculinity that also teaches men they don't have to ask permission to act on their sexual desires.

As Cameron Baumgartner noted on Twitter, Piper mischaracterizes egalitarianism by «repeating multiple times that it teaches men they don't owe women care and protection.

It teaches that man does not need a saviour: that he can justify himself before God by obeying the Law of the Torah.

Jesus» retort to the devil is a good place to begin: He [God] humbled you, causing you to hunger and then feeding you with manna, which neither you nor your fathers had known, to teach you that man does not live by bread alone but on every word that comes from the mouth of God....

He humbled you, causing you to hunger and then feeding you with manna, which neither you nor your ancestors had known, to teach you that man does not live on bread alone but on every word that comes from the mouth of the Lord.

3 He humbled you, causing you to hunger and then feeding you with manna, which neither you nor your ancestors had known, to teach you that man does not live on bread alone but on every word that comes from the mouth of the LORD.

Not exact matches

«This is deeply ingrained bias and years of culture that have long taught men to speak up and loud and with authority and the rest of us [women] to listen when they do so.»

They're doing it through dozens of workshops held in community centers, libraries, YMCA's, and municipal buildings, where anywhere from 40 to 60 women (and sometimes a few men) work their way through a two - hour curriculum that teaches them how to figure out how much they should be paid, how to make their case to an employer, and how to gracefully exit a negotiation that might not be going well.

This is the double standard at the heart of masculinity: Men are taught to regularly say and do things to women that they would never say or do to other men, that they would never want men to say or do to thMen are taught to regularly say and do things to women that they would never say or do to other men, that they would never want men to say or do to thmen, that they would never want men to say or do to thmen to say or do to them.

One of the earliest lessons that Turner taught Williams came via a piece of paper on the wall of the janitor's room, which said, «There is no limit to what a man can do or where he can go if he does not mind who gets the credit.»

The program doesn't just teach men how to become great entrepreneurs, it also teaches them how to be leaders and role models.

«I'm not going to lie for them,» Holzwarth said, adding that Kalanick, who she dated for three years, is «part of a class of privileged men who have been taught they can do whatever they want, and now they can.»

This was done because Jefferson believed that some Christian teachings were correct, however, being a man of reason, he rejected the supernatural portions which were pure iron age fairy tale.

I don't believe God «fixes» us in the way that you were taught as a young man to believe, and I am sorry you had that experience.

my greatest concern is this «new teaching» on cussing is that I don't see it throughout the life, ministry or teachings of Jesus or any of the disciples or really any man God uses in the word... What I do hear Him say is that we will be «judged by every careless word» and that's not legalism, that's red letter.

The best man I know is the man who helps me train at the gym — he helps me with my wraps, teaches me new technique, and doesn't take it east on me in sparring, because he believes in my capabilities and wants me to improve.

Paul claimed to James that he is observant and NOT teaching Jews otherwise; to prove it, he agrees to go through a Nazarite ritual and pay for four other men to do the same (it was expensive).

So, not only do we think you're an idiot for actually believing in a magical, all - powerful, invisible man who lives in the sky and demands things of you, we think you're an idiot for turning your back on the teachings of this magical, all - powerful, invisible man who lives in the sky.

If these men want to teach male headship and female submission and can do so without oppressing anyone then fine, however, there are so many examples of their teaching being used to control, restrict, oppress people that it needs to be challenged.

I do not embrace the man - made hierarchy of the Catholic Church or the secrecy and corruption it engenders, but I understand why they are concerned about nuns and priests - those who bear their name - and what it is they teach.

«In my faith community, popular women pastors such as Joyce Meyer were considered unbiblical for preaching from the pulpit in violation of the apostle Paul's restriction in 1 Timothy 2:12 («I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent»),

So when Paul (inspired to say) said «I do not permit a woman to teach, or exercise authority over a man» I accept that.

In all honesty, would you vote for a man that was a former imam of a mosque that advocates converting everyone to Islam, and teaches that all adherents should do anything, including lie, to advance the aims of creating a global kingdom for Allah on earth?

Doesn't take away from the fact that he follows the teachings of men who felt they needed 40 wives and especially enjoyed sleeping with children.

The bible does not teach men's dominance over women.

Do they teach the love of man?

But what I've always wondered is, if there is an ultimate truth, why doesn't God stick it smack in our faces, so we can't make these mistakes of whether women can preach and teach men, whether blacks can marry whites, whether slavery is OK, and whether we can worship with instruments or not?

I can futher give other religious teachings that say that we are not judges (ok, Judge Judy is), but we stand as imperfect creatures who do not have the right to judge nor condem our fellow man (and woman) if their beliefs do not align themselves with ours.

The Bible does not teach any man or any government how to rule this world.

Yes, I truly don't understand why men who claim to be born - again Christians spend YEARS studying the volumes of Calvin (which is simply what a very evil man thought of the Bible), when Jesus Himself said that the Holy Spirit would teach us all things.

Epicurus taught the idea that pleasure of the individual was the sole good in life, though he also believed in the existence of gods, whom they felt did not create the universe, nor inflict punishment or bestow blessings, but that they were disinterested in what man was doing.

Do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent.»

Instead, why don't you teach your children to study hard and get a good education at a «real» college where they can learn «real» subjects like biology and astrophysics, instead of relying on a priest or a minister to teach them that mythical being created man and the universe?

(Matthew 19:12 ASV) I don't know why anyone would follow the teachings of someone who literally tells all men to cut off their privates.

While I understand your anger, I do not think you understand that it was not the whole of the Catholic Church that committed these crimes, it was men, power hungry men, that actually acted outside of the true teachings of the religion.

The proper thing to teach young black males is to stay in school, get good grades, choose a respectable career field, attend church regularly, be kind and couteous to everyone you meet, repect and support the police, stay off drugs, don't steal, don't assault people, and quit thinking the man is out to get you.

Ive taught our two sons to see their mother and two older sisters, and all women, as weaker vessels (vases) that need protection, but in whom the treasure of Christ dwells as wonderfully as He does in us men.

'' I have no idea what Bell is trying to prove; but the lost of income» — it doesn't make a lot of sense for a man of no faith to teach at; Christian schools... «his wife» — not related, read the story... «and potentially his home» - once again, related to his jobs at Christian schools.

For example, it emphasizes passages like 1 Timothy 2:12 («I do not permit a woman to teach or have authority over a man; she must be silent») while ignoring others like 1 Corinthians 11:5 («every woman who prays or prophecies with her head uncovered disgraces her head»).

For the faithful in Christ can not accept this view, which holds either that after Adam there existed men on this earth who did not receive their origin by natural generation from him, the first parent of all, or that Adam signifies some kind of multiple first parents; for it is by no means apparent how such an opinion can be reconciled with what the sources of revealed truth and the acts of the magisterium of the Church teach about original sin, which proceeds from a sin truly committed by one Adam, and which is transmitted to all by generation, and exists in each one as his own» -LCB- Humani Generis 37).

(2358) It does, however, teach that the meaning of human sexuality is found within the context of the life - long commitment of one man and one woman whose love (when enacted sexually) is potentially pro-creative.

It forces recognition of the fact that Jesus» teaching did not center around such ideas as the infinite worth of personality, the cultivation of the inner life, the development of man toward an ideal; that Jesus spoke rather of the coming Kingdom of God, which was to be God's gift, not man's achievement, of man's decision for or against the Kingdom, and of the divine demand for obedience.

And thus do they pervert and distort the Scriptures, making them the guide to slavish details of the daily life and an authority in things nonspiritual instead of appealing to the sacred writings as the repository of the moral wisdom, religious inspiration, and the spiritual teaching of the God - knowing men of other generations.»

And they, in their turn, sought to do the best they could to carry on the Apostle's teachings that they heard from them directly or from the men that came directly after them.

We consider what he taught about God and his will for man immeasurably more important than what any other person in human history has said or done.

Jesus teaches, «what man is there that doesn't count the cost of the house first prior to building it?»

People seem to think that you have to throw away all the teaching of the great men of the last century because it doesn't match with the Westminster Confession.

Whoever then relaxes one of the least of these commandments and teaches men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but he who does them and teaches them shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.»

What positive meaning «to do the will of God» has for men has yet to be determined from the teaching of Jesus.

It should be mandatory that every person who knows they are dying truly gets to understand what Jesus teaches and weren't conned (or, don't care) by some false preacher / teacher discussing man made lies..