Another stream of inquiry in the late 1980s revisited the district role in response to increasing state policy interventions such as curricular standards, graduation requirements, standardized testing,
teacher career ladders and new licensure requirements.
Support teachers by expanding trainings in areas that promote positive school culture and expand
teacher career ladders dedicated to establishing positive school cultures.
Teacher quality was a key theme of several sessions ranging from
teacher career ladders to school leader preparation.
Even small cuts can make the difference between states and districts being able to creatively implement promising ideas such as personalized learning or
teacher career ladders and struggling to maintain current resources.
Support teachers by keeping and expanding the guidance to promote positive school culture and expand
teacher career ladders dedicated to establishing positive school cultures.
A national survey on
teacher career ladders and other incentives, released last month by the Southern Regional Education Board, found some sort of incentive plan in place in about 25 states.
We are also excited about our innovative
teacher career ladder and professional development systems in which we recruit talented educators, provide them with opportunities to develop their craft, and retain them through formal recognition of their expertise, generous compensation, and a manageable yet challenging workload.
In 2012, the New York City Department of Education, or NYCDOE — the largest public school system in the country — and the United Federation of Teachers, or UFT, designed
a teacher career ladder to extend educators» skills beyond their individual classrooms and allow teachers to be powerful levers of change in school communities.
I mentioned
the teacher career ladder system a moment ago.
Not exact matches
For example, if your child wants to be a
teacher, but has ambitions of progressing up the
career ladder, a higher education leadership degree is well worth having.
Fariña also worked with the UFT to create an expanded
career ladder for
teachers, which also was introduced in the 2014 contract.
I support universalpre — K, reduced class size, year - round schooling, and
career ladders for
teachers.
Touchstone's
career ladder enables consistently excellent
teachers to climb to the «master
teacher» position, in which they can earn up to $ 100,000 a year without leaving the classroom, within per - pupil funding.
Teaching would gain some of the accoutrements of a profession, such as
career ladders that enable
teachers to gain in status and pay without leaving the classroom; master
teachers would design training programs and supervise novices.
Teachers attend yearly professional development seminars, for instance, and take part in
career -
ladder programs.
Citizens in Provo, Utah, voted late last month to approve the transfer of funds from the school district's capital - improvements budget in order to establish a
career -
ladder plan for
teachers.
This we can see in Thomas Dee's account of Tennessee's 13 - year attempt to install a workable «
career ladder» for the Volunteer State's public - school
teachers (see «Dollars and Sense,» page 60).
The old
career ladder programs failed because the best
teachers were honored with new titles and more work, but with meager, if any, extra pay.
In some cases, the incentives include more - extensive
career ladders for classroom
teachers than the public schools offer.
The best incentive plans are those that go beyond rewarding select
teachers whose students score higher on standardized tests, says Darling - Hammond; they use multiple measures to evaluate
teacher performance and create
career ladders capable of supporting and rewarding all
teachers.
The foundation's
Teacher Advancement Program, which provides training opportunities to help
teachers climb a
career ladder toward higher salaries based on their performance, is now in place in 85 schools and is poised for a major expansion, with states and the federal government offering financial support.
Early in a HISD
teacher's
career, rising compensation comes entirely from progression up the salary
ladder — as is common across the U.S., HISD
teachers do not vest into the pension plan for ten years and do not become eligible for meaningful retirement compensation for years after.
At the same time, the system needs better
career ladders for
teachers and far more effective approaches to selection, mentoring, and evaluation in order to enlist such talent productively.
The criticisms suggest that, despite the relative sophistication of the
career ladder, its efficacy in rewarding high - quality
teachers remains an open question.
To see what these Tennessee programs tell us about merit pay, let's first look at the effects simply of having a
teacher in the
career -
ladder program, ignoring for the moment the
teacher's specific level of accomplishment.
This surprising pattern could in theory reflect the success of the
career ladder in attracting (and retaining) new, high - ability math
teachers and in providing these new
teachers with early mentoring and professional development.
This suggests the
career ladder may have been modestly successful in identifying the most outstanding
teachers in reading.
Our main results indicate that students with
career -
ladder teachers scored nearly 3 percentile points higher in mathematics than students with other
teachers.
In math, the
career -
ladder teachers at the probationary / apprentice level and at Level I were the most successful at promoting achievement.
In contrast,
career -
ladder teachers at the master level did not have a statistically significant effect on math scores (see Figure 2).
Boosted by a recent study linking Arizona's
career -
ladder program for
teachers to higher student achievement, some state lawmakers are trying to expand the five - year - old pilot program.
For new
teachers, however, the first rung of the
career ladder was a one - year probation supervised by two tenured
teachers from their school.
She went on to work at the
Teacher Advancement Programs at the Milken Family Foundation, where she found herself asking many questions about organizational structure and the career ladder of teachers, particularly the support of teacher leaders and the growth of the prof
Teacher Advancement Programs at the Milken Family Foundation, where she found herself asking many questions about organizational structure and the
career ladder of
teachers, particularly the support of
teacher leaders and the growth of the prof
teacher leaders and the growth of the profession.
Despite some success in rewarding
teachers for producing better student outcomes, the
career ladder was a target of the same criticisms that challenge virtually all attempts to tinker with systems of
teachers» compensation.
The evaluations that occurred at each stage of the
career ladder assessed
teachers on multiple «domains of competence» using several distinct data sources (such as student and principal questionnaires, peer evaluations, a
teacher's portfolio, and a written test).
The estimated gains associated with assignment to a
career -
ladder teacher equal 40 to 60 percent of the gains associated with assignment to a class with roughly 15 students rather than 22.
Coincidentally, a compelling way to evaluate the success of the
career ladder system comes via data from Governor Alexander's Student
Teacher Achievement Ratio program.
Regardless, our best guess is that having a
career -
ladder teacher in either subject had a quite large effect.
These random assignments allow us to use the STAR data to compare the performance of students assigned to
career -
ladder teachers with the performance of students in the same school and grade who were assigned to nonparticipating
teachers.
In contrast, the math - score gains associated with having a
career -
ladder teacher actually appear to have been concentrated among students with
teachers on the lowest rungs of the
career ladder.
Under the original formulation of the
career ladder, participation was optional for veteran
teachers and mandatory for new
teachers.
Our second analysis, therefore, considered not only the
teacher's participation in a
career ladder, but also the
teacher's status within the program.
This raises the possibility that, if
career -
ladder teachers were more effective, it was simply because better
teachers were more willing to negotiate the bureaucratic impediments to advancing on the
career ladder.
While states and districts can assume responsibility for increasing pay, reducing or altering entry requirements, or creating
career ladders, such initiatives will ultimately make little difference if a
teacher is dissatisfied with teaching.
However, in 1987, the
career ladder was revised to make it optional for all
teachers.
In short, it appears that the
career ladder simply was not very effective at distinguishing superior or outstanding math
teachers from those who were merely competent.
Nonetheless, assignment to a
teacher who had been certified by the
career -
ladder evaluations led to large and statistically significant increases in mathematics scores and sizable, though statistically insignificant, increases in reading scores.
The benefits of having a
career -
ladder teacher are measured relative to a somewhat atypical base — namely, the small group of students whose
teachers chose not to apply for the program or were unsuccessful in their application.
Nearly all of the state's
teachers (94 percent of them, according to one report) chose to enter the
career -
ladder program.
Finally, because the student -
teacher pairings were initially random, any statistically significant difference in performance between students with and without
career -
ladder teachers should be attributable to true differences in the quality of the
teachers.