2) Florida: The IG report conclusively found that the allegation made by one school that K12 intentionally avoided
teacher certification laws was unsubstantiated (see: http://prn.to/17WI5Oz).
One needs to consider the impact of restrictive collective bargaining agreements that prevent rewarding good teachers and removing ineffective ones, intrusive court interventions, and useless
teacher certification laws.
Relay Graduate School of Education — Illegal lobbying marks effort to undermine Connecticut's
teacher certification law
post was entitled, Relay Graduate School of Education — Illegal lobbying marks effort to undermine Connecticut's
teacher certification law.
The Education Licensure Reciprocity Act essentially changes
the teacher certification law in the state.
on Relay Graduate School of Education — Illegal lobbying marks effort to undermine Connecticut's
teacher certification law
Not exact matches
«Our position is the same as it was when the legislation was passed: We believe the legislation's intent did not allow for SUNY to adopt regulations that are inconsistent with current
laws governing charter schools, including
laws related to
teacher certification requirements.»
Nor did it intend to empower SUNY to adopt regulations that are inconsistent with current
laws governing charter schools, including but not limited to
laws related to
teacher certification requirements...»
Supporters of
teacher certification often make analogies to professions like
law and medicine, where being an effective professional requires the acquisition of vast knowledge and skills.
The
law also requires states to ensure their
teachers are «highly qualified,» which generally means that they have a bachelor's degree in the subject they are teaching and state
certification.
Although Commonwealth charters are authorized by BESE and subject to most state
laws and regulations governing public schools, they are exempt from certain regulations related to
teacher certification and tenure, and they are free from the confines of any preexisting collective - bargaining agreements.
If the bill becomes
law, Indiana will join a handful of other states that already have
teacher controlled beards with independent authority over licensing and
certification.
For example: (1)
teachers in charter schools have
certification requirements as do other public schools; (2) charter schools are subject to academic standards set by the state; (3) charter schools must comply with local, state, and federal
laws related to health, safety and civil rights; and (4) charter schools are «subject to the supervision of the superintendent of public instruction and the state board of education.»
Statewide tenure
laws remain largely intact, as do
laws that require a specific set of education - school courses before a
teacher can be certified, despite the paucity of evidence that such courses (or
certification) yield benefits in the classroom.
Brimelow suggests repealing collective - bargaining
laws so that «school boards would no longer be forced to deal with the union just because a majority of the
teachers voting in a
certification election supported it.»
According to this point of view,
certification is necessary to ensure
teacher quality, because teaching, like other professions (
law, medicine, the sciences, and so forth), requires mastery of an esoteric body of substantive and pedagogical knowledge that can not be obtained without undergoing a rigorous training program.
Georgia has a strong track record of reform, including an overhaul of the state's performance standards; redevelopment of state exams; uniform standards for high school graduation; and a
law that has led to the approval of 27 alternative providers of
teacher certification.
The Commission will examine factors contributing to
teacher recruitment and performance including: incentives to hire and retain high - quality
teachers; improvements in the
teacher evaluation system to ensure New York is implementing one of the strongest evaluation systems in the country; the use of
teacher evaluations for decisions regarding promotion, hiring and termination as required in the
teacher evaluation
law; and
teacher preparation,
certification and education programs to ensure that
teachers are properly trained to best educate our students.
As a result, the problem the
law sought to tackle is still dire: Students in high - poverty schools, a national survey has shown, are twice as likely to have their most important classes taught by
teachers without proper
certification.
(Sec. 8027) Current
law prohibits the use of funds available under the ESEA to mandate nationwide testing or
certification of
teachers or education paraprofessionals.
Additionally, KIPP schools comply with any applicable state and federal
laws, and
certification requirements for charter school
teachers vary by state.
State
law may say that each
teacher must have «appropriate
certification for the position held,» but determining what a person needs to do in order to earn and maintain
certification is in the hands of these departments and boards.
ARLINGTON, Va. — More than 80 percent of Americans agreed that
teachers should achieve Board
certification in addition to be being licensed to practice, similar to professions like
law and medicine, according to results from a national poll by PDK International and Gallup released today.
Their suit charged that the state's
teacher -
certification exam discriminated against blacks, violating their 14th Amendment protections and federal civil rights
laws.
• Public elementary, middle, and secondary school special education
teachers must meet the special education
teacher certification requirements in the
law and regulations.
Public charter schools would be subject to
teacher certification requirements, government oversight, and performance reporting requirements, but exempt from certain state
laws and school district policies.
The NCLB
law used three key guidelines to determine whether a
teacher is highly qualified: (1) at least a bachelor's degree in the subject taught, (2) full state
teacher certification, and (3) demonstrated knowledge in the subject taught (U.S. Department of Education, 2001).
In addition to her
law degree, Deborah holds dual
certification as an elementary and special education
teacher and is a certified school district administrator.
Federal
law in postsecondary education must also be a robust source of support for local innovation, research, and implementation of strategies designed to improve
teacher and principal effectiveness and include: Evidence - based preparation and professional development; Evidence - based evaluation systems that include, in part, student performance; Alternative
certification programs that meet workforce needs; State and school district flexibility regarding credentials for small and / or rural schools, special education programs, English learners and specialized programs such as science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics; and Locally - determined compensation and
teacher and principal assignment policies.
Since the provision didn't require the use of student test data in measuring
teacher quality (focusing instead on
certification and other qualifications that have no positive correlation to student achievement), it should be removed from the
law.
There are over 45,000 public school
teachers who meet Connecticut's
certification law and nearly as many retired
teachers who met the
law when they were
teachers.
But in direct violation of state
law, Morgan Barth apparently never held Connecticut state
certification to be a
teacher or an administrator.
Federal
law requires the
certification of bilingual and special education
teachers, though a few DOIs are apparently not yet aware of that continuing requirement.
Luckily for Barth, and thanks in part to a $ 100,000 - a-year lobbying contract with one of Connecticut's most influential lobbying firms, Achievement First, Inc. (and its associated organizations ConnCAN and ConnAD) were able to convince the Connecticut General Assembly to pass a
law in 2010 that exempted Connecticut's charter schools from Connecticut's mandatory
teacher and administrator
certification requirements.
... Proponents say evidence is mounting that states with good alternative
certification laws see increases in test scores as well as more minority
teachers and more of the best and the brightest...
On top of the flexibility created by last year's alternative
certification law, CSP's bill would give charters where at least half of students are impoverished the ability to hire
teachers who are licensed in other states and those who have completed alternative licensure programs in other states and taught for at least two years in high - poverty schools.
Differences over results Proponents say evidence is mounting that states with good alternative
certification laws see increases in test scores as well as more minority
teachers and more of the best and the brightest.
The new state «alternative
certification»
law was supposed to go into effect Aug. 1, 2011, but the Minnesota Board of Teaching has yet to create a process for licensing the
teachers.
Critics countered that the
law did not ask the board to evaluate the quality of the out - of - state programs, instead requiring it to «issue a standard license to an otherwise qualified
teacher candidate under this section who successfully performs throughout a program under this section, successfully completes all required skills, pedagogy and content area examinations,» and either demonstrates proficiency to a site - based evaluation team or completed an alternative
certification program in another state.
All
teachers must comply with state
certification laws, just as in traditional public schools.
New Haven, Conn. — The state Senate passed a bill today that would remove long - standing barriers to
teacher certification for talented candidates of color, leaving members of the House to decide by next week if SB 455 will become
law.
«Highly qualified»
teachers, according to the federal No Child Left Behind
law, must hold a major or minor college degree in the field they teach, demonstrate competence on either the Praxis I or Praxis II exams, and have state
certification, meaning they completed a college program in education.
Teachers with alternative qualifications are finding it difficult to make their way into Minnesota classrooms as a 2011
certification law continues to go un-implemented.
The intent of the
law was to allow for an alternative to traditional college
teacher - training programs, but much of the hang - up seems to be the fact that the alternative
certification candidates, by definition, lack the university transcript the board expects to see.
In other words, private non-profit «entities» receive public funds to operate public charter schools with permission to operate outside of various state and local
laws, such as limited or no requirements for
teacher certification and collective bargaining; but only if they met State educational goals.
Despite ongoing discussions with the school on the vital importance of upholding the state
law on
teacher certification, the issues had not been completely corrected.
Despite a state
law requiring all
teachers and administrators to hold state
certification, Morgan Barth refused to go through process required to be in a Connecticut classroom or principal's office.
SB 1839 (Hughes / Koop)-- TCTA was successful in ensuring that current
law allowing
certification reciprocity for out - of - state
teachers only if they had passed a
certification test similar to, and at least as rigorous as, the relevant Texas
certification exam, was not eliminated.
on Malloy / Pryor's new «Turnaround Director» violated Connecticut
law by failing to get proper
teacher certification
But despite coming to Connecticut nine years ago, Morgan Barth never bothered to acquire
certification under Connecticut's
teacher and administrator
certification law.