* The value - added model that the MET project employs, while common in the literature, is also not designed to address how the distribution of
teacher effects varies between high - and low - performing classrooms (e.g., teachers of ELL classes are assumed to be of the same average effectiveness as teachers of gifted / talented classes).
Not exact matches
An admittedly indirect way to evaluate the
effects of these unobserved differences in
teacher quality is to consider how the performance gain associated with having a
teacher of the same race
varies across different types of schools.
Our results suggest that elementary - school students learn more with «tough»
teachers, with the
effects varying depending on students» initial performance levels and on the overall performance level of their classrooms.
In this set of eight studies, Lalli and Feger (2005) was the sole example of a study designed to compare the
effects of systematically
varied structures in
teacher leader preparation programs.
Strong programs that have the most
effect, they found, are Native language and culture immersion programs that enhance student motivation, ethnic pride, and self - esteem; provide
varied opportunities for parent and elder involvement; and provide investment in
teacher professional development and «community intellectual resources,» as evidenced by «grow your own» approaches to Native
teacher preparation.
Many have written about the nature of programs in
teacher education: too
varied, too theoretical, too much reliance on craft knowledge rather than based on elements of research, too little research on the
effects of
teacher preparation programs, a lack of attention to determining their
effects on student achievement, and so on.
Employing a difference - in - difference estimator, we find that the loan forgiveness program decreased attrition of
teachers in shortage areas, although the
effects varied by subject.
that
teachers matter and that
teachers vary in their
effects on student achievement.
Functions The
teacher leader: a) Collaborates with colleagues and school administrators to plan professional learning that is team - based, job - embedded, sustained over time, aligned with content standards, and linked to school / district improvement goals; b) Uses information about adult learning to respond to the diverse learning needs of colleagues by identifying, promoting, and facilitating
varied and differentiated professional learning; c) Facilitates professional learning among colleagues; d) Identifies and uses appropriate technologies to promote collaborative and differentiated professional learning; e) Works with colleagues to collect, analyze, and disseminate data related to the quality of professional learning and its
effect on teaching and student learning; f) Advocates for sufficient preparation, time, and support for colleagues to work in teams to engage in job - embedded professional learning; g) Provides constructive feedback to colleagues to strengthen teaching practice and improve student learning; and h) Uses information about emerging education, economic, and social trends in planning and facilitating professional learning.
Quality has been defined in terms of both process (activities) and structure (
teacher characteristics, class size, etc.) and is poor to mediocre in many countries.6 - 7 The
effects of variations in care are not expected to be uniform; rather, it is expected to
vary with the characteristics of the children, their families, and the broader social contexts in which they live.