Sentences with phrase «teacher evaluation guidelines for»

Not exact matches

BOX 14, I -1-4; 30188578 / 734260 Slides Plus Audiotape - SAPA II, Orientation Filmstips, AAAS, «The Integrated Process», Filmstrip 4, 1974 SAPA II, Orientation Filmstrips, AAAS, «Measuring», Filmstrip 3, 1974 Plus Audiotape - SAPA II, Orientation Filmstrips, AAAS, «Teaching Strategies», Filmstrip 3, 1974 Plus Transcript of orientation tape - SAPA II, Orientation Filmstrips, AAAS, «The Basic Processes of Science», Filmstrip 2, 1974 «Laboratory Exercises for Use in a College Science Course for Non-Science Majors» - by James Wallace Cox, 1970 «A Process Approach to Learning, Supplementary Manual», based on SAPA developed by AAAS, by Ruth M. White, 1970 «Science Process Instrument, Experimental Edition», COSE, 1970 «Preservice Science Education of Elementary School Teachers - Guidelines, Standards and Recommendations for Research and Development» report, Feb. 1969 (4 Folders) «Preservice Science Education of Elementary School Teachers - Preliminary Report», Feb. 1969 «An Evaluation of Elementary Science Study as SAPA» by Robert B. Nicodemus, Sept. 1968 «SAPA - Purposes, Accomplishments, Expectations», COSE, AAAS (Brochure reported in Nov. 1968, 1970), 1967 (3 Folders) «The Psychological Bases of SAPA», COSE, 1965 «Guidelines and Standards for the Education of Secondary School Teachers of Sciecne and Mathematics» bookley, AAAS and the National Association of State Directors of Teacher Education and Certification «Career Opportunites in the Sciences» brochure, compiled by the Office of Opportunites in Science Slides and documentation - «Animal Eyes» and «Meterological Instruments», Fernbank Science Center, «An Integral Part of the DeKalb County School System» Slides and documentation - «Building Terrariums» and «What is my Age?»

In exchange for that flexibility, the administration will require states to adopt standards for college and career readiness, focus improvement efforts on 15 percent of the most troubled schools, and create guidelines for teacher evaluations based in part on student performance.

aEvaluation and Eligibility Resources Procedures for Identifying Specific Learning Disabilities Attention Difficulties, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), and Other Health Impairment Guidelines Request for Special Education Evaluation Initial Evaluation Process and Time Line Reevaluation Process and Time Line REED Dates in Correct Procedural Order Navigating the REED Process REED Rubric Teacher Report for Special Education Reevaluation Preparation for REED MARSE Eligibility Excerpts Cover Page MARSE Eligibility Information Initial Closeout Letter

Washington's high - risk designation specified that the State must submit, by May 1, 2014, final guidelines for teacher and principal evaluation and support systems that meet the requirements of ESEA flexibility, including requiring local educational agencies (LEAs) to use student achievement on CCR State assessments to measure student learning growth in those systems for teachers of tested grades and subjects.

While data - driven reformers lauded the guidelines as a big step for the NEA, Van Roekel said he wouldn't want new teacher evaluations to use standardized exams that are already in place.

Virginia's Board of Education also approved the Guidelines for Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Teachers which will also go into effect July 1, 2012.

This summer, the NEA adapted new teacher evaluation guidelines that, for the first time, took student performance into account.

Many districts preparing to fully implement state guidelines in the coming year are currently searching for ways to manage the teacher evaluation process in an easy, efficient and cost - effective way.

Developed by the Arizona Charter Schools Association and Center for Student Achievement with the support of a federal grant, the Quality Standards Evaluation Tool is a set of guidelines used by school leaders and teachers to increase student achievement and strengthen school sustainability.

The participating schools have spent significant time refining a shared evaluation program such that it meets local and state regulations (New York and New Jersey) and federal guidelines for the Teacher Incentive Fund (TIF — the program through which the PICCS project is funded).

Within 60 days, Superintendent Huppenthal and the Arizona Department of Education (ADE) must: (1) finalize its teacher and principal evaluation guidelines; (2) give sufficient weighting to student growth so as to differentiate between teachers / principals who have contributed to more / less growth in student learning and achievement; (3) ensure that shared attribution of growth does not mask high or low performing teachers as measured by growth; and (4) guarantee that all of this is done in time for schools to be prepared to implement for the 2014 - 2015 school year.

That became official federal policy when the Obama administration called for statewide teacher evaluation guidelines, based in part on student performance, while soliciting for Race To The Top in 2009 and then No Child Left Behind waiver applications in 2011.

Superintendent Huppenthal was given 60 days to make two revisions: (1) adjust the graduation rate to account for 20 % of a school's A-F letter grade instead of the proposed 15 % and, as most pertinent here, (2) finalize the guidelines for the teacher and principal evaluations to comply with Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Flexibility (i.e., the NCLB waiver guidelines).

The new guidelines require ways to connect student - level data with college outcomes; evaluations that include tests for teachers, principals, school boards and superintendents; a focus on school overhauls; and the agreement of local teachers» unions.

To gain a waiver, states will have to adopt college - and career - ready standards and tie state tests to them, adopt a differentiated accountability system that focuses on 15 percent of their most troubled schools, and craft guidelines for teacher - and principal - evaluation systems that will be based partly on student growth and be used for personnel decisions.

The hastily called hearing sought to be a forum for the various groups to air mounting concerns about implementation of the new standards and especially the new testing, which will not only gauge how much students have learned but will also be used in measuring teacher performance under the state's new evaluation guidelines.

Weston is only now searching for an online tool to manage teacher evaluation data, unlike many districts that started out looking at the new teacher evaluation guidelines through a data management software lens.

Through its flexible guidelines, the department has put forward a more balanced approach that is the new norm for teacher evaluation: Student learning is a critical component of teachers» work, but their test scores should be one of many aspects when measuring effective teaching.

The Code of Virginia requires that (1) principal evaluations be consistent with the performance objectives (standards) set forth in the Board's Guidelines for Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Teachers, Administrators, and Superintendents and (2) school boards» procedures for evaluating principals address student academic progress.

The Code of Virginia requires that (1) superintendent evaluations be consistent with the performance objectives (standards) set forth in the Board's Guidelines for Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Teachers, Administrators, and Superintendents and (2) school boards» procedures for evaluating principals address student academic progress.

The training materials are intended to help school divisions in aligning their current evaluation systems with the newly revised Guidelines for Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria forevaluation systems with the newly revised Guidelines for Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria forEvaluation Criteria for Teachers.

The training materials are intended to provide support to central office supervisory personnel, principals, and teachers in the implementation of the 2011 Guidelines for Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Tteachers in the implementation of the 2011 Guidelines for Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for TeachersTeachers.

The Guidelines for Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Teachers set forth seven performance standards for all Virginia tTeachers set forth seven performance standards for all Virginia teachersteachers.

The Board of Education is required to establish performance standards and evaluation criteria for teachers, principals, and superintendents to serve as guidelines for school divisions to use in implementing educator evaluation systems.

LAUSD General Counsel David Holmquist told LA School Report that the guidelines issued by Superintendent Deasy on Friday do not prohibit school principals from making student progress count for less than 30 % of teacher evaluations.

The Guidelines for Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria set forth seven standards for all Virginia teachers.

The Guidelines for Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Teachers provide school divisions with a model evaluation system, including sample forms and templates that may be implemented «as is» or used to refine existing local teacher evaluatioEvaluation Criteria for Teachers provide school divisions with a model evaluation system, including sample forms and templates that may be implemented «as is» or used to refine existing local teacher evaluatioevaluation system, including sample forms and templates that may be implemented «as is» or used to refine existing local teacher evaluationevaluation systems.

The Board is required to establish performance standards and evaluation criteria for teachers, principals, and superintendents to serve as guidelines for school divisions to use in implementing educator evaluation systems.

The revised Guidelines for Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Teachers incorporate these teaching standards.

Earlier this month, Superintendent John Deasy issued guidelines to principals, saying that student progress (including test scores and other metrics) should count for up to 30 percent of teacher evaluations.

The Board of Education is responsible for establishing teacher, principal and superintendent guidelines including performance standards and evaluation criteria to assist school divisions in implementing educator evaluation systems.

The teacher evaluation code sets guidelines for a new statewide evaluation system aimed to launch in 2013.

Under the new guidelines from LAUSD, assessment of student progress will account for up to 30 % of a teacher's total evaluation, comprised both of individual test scores and school - wide Academic Growth Over Time (or AGT).

Texas» NCLB waiver was conditioned on the incorporation of guidelines for a teacher evaluation system that included the use of student growth, including growth on state tests for teachers of tested subjects and grades, as a significant factor in determining a teacher's evaluation rating.

The Teacher Evaluation Advisory Committee is charged with developing and recommending to the State Board of Education guidelines and criteria for a multiple - measures teacher and principal effectiveness evaluation system, which will be administered annually to all teachers and principals in theTeacher Evaluation Advisory Committee is charged with developing and recommending to the State Board of Education guidelines and criteria for a multiple - measures teacher and principal effectiveness evaluation system, which will be administered annually to all teachers and principals in Evaluation Advisory Committee is charged with developing and recommending to the State Board of Education guidelines and criteria for a multiple - measures teacher and principal effectiveness evaluation system, which will be administered annually to all teachers and principals in theteacher and principal effectiveness evaluation system, which will be administered annually to all teachers and principals in evaluation system, which will be administered annually to all teachers and principals in the state.

As they begin to build capacity for an improved teacher evaluation system according to state guidelines, they will add stakeholders to this committee so that it will oversee and align the district's work on both systems.

Texas is receiving only a conditional one - year waiver with the opportunity to renew contingent on the state finalizing its guidelines for teacher and principal evaluation and support systems during the 2013 — 14 school year.

In the 2010 law the deadline for the State Board of Education to adopt the guidelines for teacher evaluation was no later than July 1, 2013 and some guidelines must instruct local education officials as to the «minimum requirements for teacher evaluation instruments and procedures.»

The 2010 law gives our State Board of Education the authority to adopt a standard set of guidelines that will set out the requirements for teacher evaluation instruments and procedures.

Vermont's Guidelines for Teacher and Leader Effectiveness require observations and formative and summative evaluations.

Donaldson added that the situation has led to «classroom teachers in the pilot schools coming to very different understandings of what is expected of them» under the new state evaluation guidelines — a system scheduled to be mandated for all educators next year.

69 percent of teachers and 76 percent of administrators thought that the Connecticut guidelines for educator evaluation are clear and assist the PDEC to complete its charge.

The existing and continuing assumption is inclusion of the whole model (i.e. all Teacher and Administrator Evaluation Components as defined in the Connecticut Guidelines for Educator Evaluation), and full implementation, district - wide in every district.

TEACHER EVALUATION PROGRAM SBE, in consultation with the PEAC, must adopt guidelines for model program by July 1, 2012.