Thursday's LA Times editorial about the use of student achievement data in teacher evaluations around the country (Bill Gates» warning on test scores) makes some valuable points about the dangers of rushed, half - baked
teacher evaluation schemes that count test scores as more than half of a teacher's evaluation (as is being done in some states and districts)...
Facing an arbitrary 12/21/12 deadline imposed by Chancellor Walcott, a growing wave of bloggers have begun speaking out against
any teacher evaluation scheme that harms teachers and ignores our voices in coming to an agreement.
Not exact matches
Gov. Cuomo will give New York's
teachers one month to agree to a statewide performance
evaluation plan — or he'll write his own educator - rating
scheme into the budget for legislative approval, The Post has learned.
The state Supreme Court has overturned a Superior Court judge's controversial ruling that would have upended the state's educational - funding
scheme and mandated a vast overhaul of
teacher evaluations, educational standards and special - education...
The state Supreme Court has overturned a Superior Court judge's controversial ruling that would have upended the state's educational - funding
scheme and mandated a vast overhaul of
teacher evaluations, educational standards and special - education services.
Public school students and their
teachers in Florida have been subject to endless test - based
evaluation schemes and a massive expansion of school vouchers.
He's aware, though, that he'll have a tough sell with
teachers unions, which give lip service to more - stringent
teacher evaluations but prefer existing pay and promotion
schemes based on seniority — even though they often end up matching the least experienced
teachers with the most challenging students.
Malloy's «education reform» bill is the driving force behind the Common Core testing
scheme and the unfair and inappropriate
teacher evaluation system — a legislative package that passed the Connecticut House of Representatives 149 - 0.
For two years,
teachers and public school advocates have been warning elected and appointed officials about the impending disaster that will be caused by the rollout of the Common Core, the Common Core testing
scheme and the
teacher evaluation program.
If we really want to improve teaching, we should look to develop such models of effective
evaluation rather than pursuing problematic
schemes that mis - measure
teachers, create disincentives for teaching high - need students, offer no useful feedback on how to improve teaching practice and risk driving some of the best educators out of the profession.
Parents might have seen Cheatham as a scapegoat in an ill - conceived «reform»
scheme, but a labor negotiator for the Chicago Public Schools said it was Cheatham who helped devise controversial plans for both a longer day and to use student test scores in
teacher performance
evaluations.
Though some prefer to focus on value - added and merit - pay
schemes that so far haven't definitively improved classroom performance, I want to key in on one recommendation the report makes for making the best use of
teacher evaluations: evaluating all
teachers.
Therefore, I call on the delegate assembly to (reading from resolution) resolve that the UFT should mobilize
teachers, parents and students towards a repeal of the Education Law 3012c and the new
evaluation scheme.
Gov. Cuomo recently struck a deal with the state
teachers union for an
evaluation system that resembles the city's
teacher ratings
scheme.
What I meant to emphasize was that
teachers and their unions are unhappy that politicians and now institutions — the LA Times — are imposing
evaluation schemes of which they (
teachers and union officials) disapprove.
Malloy's unwavering commitment to the Common Core, the absurd Common Core testing
scheme and the unfair and inappropriate
teacher evaluation system has rightfully earned him the ridicule of parents,
teachers and public education advocates across the state.
It seems to me that a lot of new
evaluation schemes are attempting to hold
teachers accountable for factors they don't control and penalize them for shortcomings for which they are not responsible.
What is not a sufficient part of
teacher training and preparation nor required in most
schemes of the
evaluation of
teachers is demonstrating (a) knowledge of the individual students, or (b) showing how one uses reflective practice to ensure that one is reaching the students.
But the funding
scheme has drawn wide concern among many school districts over fear it will not be enough to pay for a revamped
teacher evaluation system.
Loss of Talented
Teachers: The move toward using test scores as a key component of evaluations and «merit pay» schemes may well push many talented teachers out of the pro
Teachers: The move toward using test scores as a key component of
evaluations and «merit pay»
schemes may well push many talented
teachers out of the pro
teachers out of the profession.
Opposed by Governor Dannel Malloy, charter school advocates and the corporate education reform industry, the bill would have required the state to fix its flawed
teacher evaluation law and reduce the state's obsession with Malloy's massive standardized testing
scheme.
Rather than use the event to congratulate each other on the destruction of our public schools, Connecticut's elected officials should be explaining to Duncan that the Common Core and Common Core Testing
scheme is a fiasco that needs to be repealed and that Connecticut must be allowed to develop its own effective
teacher evaluation system that doesn't rely on the use of unfair, inappropriate and faulty standardized test scores.
Shavar Jeffries, the mouthpiece for a corporate funded, New York based, charter school advocacy group that calls itself «Democrats for Education Reform (DFER)» uses the space to urge Connecticut legislators to DEFEAT a bill that, if passed, would require Governor Dannel Malloy and his administration to develop an honest and effective
teacher evaluation system rather than continue with Malloy's present program that is dependent on the results of the unfair, inappropriate and discriminatory Common Core Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC) testing
scheme.
At the same time, the legislature completed its 2016 session without addressing the fundamental problems associated with the unfair, inappropriate and discriminatory Common Core SBAC testing
scheme, nor did it step forward and require that the Malloy administration develop a
teacher evaluation system that is not reliant on the scores of this failed and disastrous testing program.
As you read Littman's piece, remember that these are the same people who have forced the Common Core on our children, promoted the absurd, unfair and expensive Common Core testing
scheme and the equally absurd, unfair and wasteful new
teacher evaluation program.
While the decision is an important milestone on the school funding issue, Judge Thomas Moukawsher's Memorandum of Decision is nothing short of absurd, ill - conceived and simply wrong when it comes to Connecticut's special education programs, the state's illogical
teacher evaluation system and the state's over-reliance on the unfair, inappropriate and discriminatory Common Core SBAC and SAT testing
schemes.
Funded by major Wall Street executives and the education reform foundations, DFER and its related entities lobby for charter schools, the Common Core testing
scheme,
teacher evaluations based on scores and school vouchers.
In Florida, as in Connecticut, politicians have tied
teacher evaluation programs to standardized test scores and inappropriate and fault assessment
schemes.
Perhaps worst of all is Malloy's limitless commitment to the unfair, inappropriate and discriminatory Common Core Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium SBAC testing
scheme and his unwillingness to decouple those unfair test results from his deformed
teacher evaluation program.
An
evaluation of the Shanghai exchange
scheme, published today by Sheffield Hallam University, found some changes in teaching practices and a perception by
teachers that pupils were more engaged in maths learning, but all evidence is described as «anecdotal» or having limited reliability due to other curriculum changes occurring at the same time.
«
Teacher evaluation will soon be in a state of flux given that the grand scheme to use teacher evaluation to «weed out» ineffective teachers and «reward» effective teachers has simply not worked because the movement was solely focused on measuring teachers as opposed to helping the
Teacher evaluation will soon be in a state of flux given that the grand
scheme to use
teacher evaluation to «weed out» ineffective teachers and «reward» effective teachers has simply not worked because the movement was solely focused on measuring teachers as opposed to helping the
teacher evaluation to «weed out» ineffective
teachers and «reward» effective
teachers has simply not worked because the movement was solely focused on measuring
teachers as opposed to helping them grow.
As you read Peter Greene's piece on Cuomo, recall Malloy's unprecedented assault on
teachers and the teaching profession and the failure of the Democrats in the Connecticut General Assembly to derail Malloy's unfair, inappropriate and counter-productive initiatives on
teacher evaluation and the massive expansion of the Common Core Standardized Testing
scheme.
Meanwhile, why hasn't Malloy announced that, if re-elected, he will de-couple the state's
teacher evaluation system from the unfair, inappropriate and ineffective standardized testing
scheme