[4] Further (scientific) research on the issues surrounding professional development could prove helpful in deciding the overall thrust of
teacher improvement policies.
Not exact matches
Eight existing home visiting programs met the minimal legislative threshold for federal funding: Early Head Start, the Early Intervention Program, Family Check - up, Healthy Families America, Healthy Steps, Home Instruction Program for Preschool Youngsters, Nurse - Family Partnership, and Parents as
Teachers.40 In August 2011, the Coalition for Evidence - Based
Policy built upon the government's review by evaluating the extent to which programs implemented with fidelity would produce important
improvements in the lives of at - risk children and parents.41 Through this review, one program was given a strong rating (the Nurse - Family Partnership), two were given medium ratings (Early Intervention Program and Family Check - up), and all other programs were given a low rating.
New York, NY About Blog This is a place for parents,
teachers, students — and anyone who has a stake in the
improvement of our public school system — to offer ideas, share experiences and advice, and weigh in on
policies and educational politics.
While the state gains points for its
teacher assessment
policies, there is room for
improvement on indicators related...
Schools are under constant pressure to update their
policies, values and goals to reflect the changing nature of education and society, and to ensure that students,
teachers and staff alike, are following the same path to
improvement.
As Reckhow and others have noted, the focus in grant making has been on pushing new approaches and broader
policy changes that might indirectly foster
improvement in high schools — through higher standards, stronger graduation requirements, and better
teacher training.
These were peer mentoring of
teachers in growth mindset teaching practices and the revision of the school's assessment
policy to encompass continual measurement of student
improvement.
Fordham Institute Executive Vice President Mike Petrilli served as moderator, and he was joined by panelists Sandi Jacobs, Vice President and Managing Director for State
Policy, National Council on
Teacher Quality; Alice Johnson Cain, Vice President for
Policy, Teach Plus; Chet Linton, CEO and President, School
Improvement Network; and Rob Well, Director of Field Programs, Educational Issues Department, American Federation of
Teachers.
He proposes creating new roles for
teachers that let them continue to work in the classroom while being given opportunities to shape education
policy and give feedback on
improvement efforts.
Congressional Democrats worry that she has put them between a
policy goal, school
improvement, and their
teachers - union allies.
And that many
policies governing accountability, school
improvement, and
teacher evaluation are often goofily designed and ultimately destructive.
A few major areas I hope will receive attention during reauthorization are college / workplace readiness, including the promotion of more rigorous standards; greater accountability at the secondary level; more sophisticated
policy and greater accountability for improving
teacher effectiveness, particularly at the late elementary and secondary levels; a broadening of attention to math and science as well as to history; and refinements in AYP to focus greater attention and
improvement on the persistently failing schools by offering real choices to parents of students stuck in such schools.
In a new Public Impact
policy brief, A Better Blend: A Vision for Boosting Student Outcomes with Digital Learning, which we co-authored with Joe Ableidinger and Jiye Grace Han, we explain how schools can use blended learning to drive
improvements in the quality of digital instruction, transform teaching into a highly paid, opportunity - rich career that extends the reach of excellent
teachers to all students and teaching peers, and improve student learning at large scale.
Despite education
policies being a major part of party pledges, the majority of
teachers do not expect any
improvement to schools after the general election, a Tes survey has revealed.
Whether it's
teacher evaluation, school accountability, School
Improvement Grants, the Common Core, new grading
policies, restorative justice processes — to name a few — they invariably entail added meetings, extensive planning documents, new reporting requirements, new trainings and minutiae — all adding to the clutter that can drive responsible professionals to distraction.
This led some economists of the time to conclude that «input - based»
policies such as providing more money to schools, reducing class sizes and improving
teacher qualifications had «failed», and that
improvements in schools now depended on giving
teachers direct incentives to raise student performance:
Changes in states»
policies also are needed to spur
improvement in
teacher preparation, Walsh notes.
In Smith's model, as it was refined over time, curriculum standards serve as the fulcrum for educational reform implemented based on state decisions; state
policy elites aim to create excellence in the classroom using an array of
policy levers and knobs — all aligned back to the standards — including testing, textbook adoption,
teacher preparation,
teacher certification and evaluation,
teacher training, goals and timetables for school test score
improvement, and state accountability based on those goals and timetables.
Frequent topics include school
improvement, leadership, standards, accountability, the achievement gap, classroom practice, professional development,
teacher education, research, technology and innovations in teaching and learning, state and federal
policy, and education and the global economy.
True educational equity comes from comprehensive school reform, which incorporates academic
improvements along with health care, housing
policy, funding changes, family support and other
policies that allow students to go to class safely and actually focus on their work, and that provides
teachers with a work environment and enough support to operate creatively, not like infantilized robots.
And
policies tethering
teacher evaluations to student test scores are based on studies that link high - performing
teachers to long - term
improvements in the lives of students, particularly the most disadvantaged.
Just for starters, it would appear that the waiver «winners» just promised to adopt narrow, prescriptive
teacher evaluation and school
improvement policies that apply to charter schools as well as district schools — but not even charter authorities are entirely clear on how this will play out in reality or if these commitments should be taken any more seriously than so many empty promises in the Race to the Top applications.
Data on inputs such as
teacher training, disciplinary
policies, attendance
policies, and school resources may suggest important school -
improvement strategies and should also be made available to parents.
But unless newly hired
teachers are protected from the rigid seniority
policies of states and school districts, many of these
improvement efforts will fail, and the money will be wasted.
Our session, titled «Cultivating Literacy Achievement Through Quality
Teacher Preparation,» touched on current program -
improvement efforts, revision of the ILA standards for program recognition, variations in licensure requirements across the country, and
policy - related challenges.
Organizational school
improvement Student learning Accountability Enhancement of professional development /
Teacher capacity and leadership Non-specific education
policy or history (general)
His research and publication activities focus on education
policy and program change, school
improvement, in - service
teacher development, and education leadership in Canada, the United States, East Africa, Pakistan, and Chile.
Other research has pointed to the possibility that top - down and bottom - up approaches need not be viewed as alternatives, but can be combined.235 Recent research on the district role in school -
improvement activity has focused increasingly on the identification of specific district - level
policies, actions, and conditions that are related to
improvement in
teachers «and students «performance.
What to watch: Various stakeholder groups in Oklahoma expressed a desire to use federal funds on
policy changes to elevate the teaching profession through recruitment; residency and mentoring; differentiated pay and other incentives; culturally relevant teaching;
teacher leadership opportunities; and
improvements to both the evaluation and licensure systems.
This work involves (1) hearing about the strategies BMTN
teachers are testing and refining, and having
teachers the leaders are working with test out the strategies in their classrooms; (2) sharing resources and strategies that BMTN
teachers might use in their
improvement projects, (3) providing insights into
policies that might affect the instructional work of the network; and (4) helping recruit additional
teachers and instructional leaders to the network.
In total, 33 states have made «significant
improvements» to
teacher preparation
policies over the last two years, according to the report, the group's second annual study of
teacher colleges.
In this LPI Blog, Senior Researcher and
Policy Analyst Beth Meloy outlines key elements of a high - quality system to achieve this goal, including
improvements to
teacher preparation and supports for ongoing professional development.
She provides thought leadership and oversight to Public Impact's work on
teacher and leader
policy, organizational change, parental choice of schools, and emerging opportunities for dramatic
improvement in U.S. education.
She provides thought leadership and oversight to Public Impact's work on
teacher and leader
policy, organizational change, parental choice of schools, and emerging opportunities for dramatic
improvement in pre — K to grade 12 education.
As educational
policy makers seek strategies to improve the
teacher workforce, the early career period represents a unique opportunity to identify struggling
teachers, examine the likelihood of future
improvement, and make strategic pretenure investments in development or dismissals.
Recruitment and Retention of
Teachers in Tennessee's Achievement School District and iZone Schools A
Policy Brief on Driving
Improvement in Low Performing Schools
As an active member, I, along with a diverse group of 17 current NYC
teachers, joined a
teacher - led
Policy Team to propose
improvements to
teacher preparation programs.
Does our district have
policies that support data sharing with
teacher education programs for the purpose of quality
improvement?
NCTR believes states can use their authority under ESSA to support
improvements in their
teacher preparation systems through
teacher residencies and by focusing on four main
policy areas:
Teacher leadership is about increasing pathways and opportunities for teachers to exercise leadership, elevating teacher voice to inform and develop policy and practice and expanding existing efforts to steer systemic improvements to benefit student le
Teacher leadership is about increasing pathways and opportunities for
teachers to exercise leadership, elevating
teacher voice to inform and develop policy and practice and expanding existing efforts to steer systemic improvements to benefit student le
teacher voice to inform and develop
policy and practice and expanding existing efforts to steer systemic
improvements to benefit student learning.
More and more players in the education space — from
policy makers to school reformers to
teachers themselves — are on the verge of a critical realization: This profession is ripe for continuous
improvement led by its own practitioners.
«The desire for principals to focus and work with
teacher and students on the quality of teaching and learning is really spot on to what the research says should provide meaningful
improvements in student achievement,» says Ellen Goldring, a professor of educational
policy and leadership at Vanderbilt University's Peabody College in Nashville, Tennessee.
The findings of both the qualitative and quantitative analyses suggest that
policy investments in the quality of
teachers may be related to
improvements in student performance.
State lawmakers will be back in Hartford tomorrow for the start of the 2016 legislative session — and that brings opportunity for
teachers to advocate for
improvements to education
policies that affect their students, their profession, and public education.
This suggests that policymakers should consider ways in which to craft
teacher - evaluation
policy to enable
teachers to join as partners in their own assessment and
improvement.
Wisconsin should adopt a
policy requiring that
teachers who receive even one unsatisfactory evaluation be placed on structured
improvement plans.
New
Teacher Center describes strong induction programs as those that include instructional mentoring for new
teachers by carefully selected, well - prepared mentors; formative assessment for
teachers and support systems to drive continuous
improvement; professional learning communities for mentors and new
teachers; engaged principals; and supportive school environments and district
policies.9 Research suggests that regular contact between beginning
teachers and mentors over a period of at least two years can propel improved teaching and greater student learning.10
As a partial solution, Duncan proposed creating new roles for
teachers that let them continue to work with children in the classroom «while being an integral part of educational
improvements» locally and nationally, with «regular opportunities to give feedback» to the administrators who are changing
policy.
This
policy proposal from the TeachStrong coalition explains how we can design professional learning to better address student and
teacher needs, and to foster feedback and
improvement.
There, she studied and researched instructional
improvement, organizational learning, and social justice in education while teaching in Michigan's
teacher education and education
policy programs.