The National College for Teaching and Leadership's
teacher misconduct panel originally concluded that Wallace had not acted dishonestly but had been overburdened by the responsibility on his shoulders.
Not exact matches
The
misconduct panel also said it had not found that Akbar was «promoting religious extremism» but maintained his «conduct was incompatible with being a
teacher».
In Reilly v Sandwell MBC the Supreme Court held that it was reasonable for a school's disciplinary
panel to conclude that their head
teacher's non-disclosure of her friendship with a man convicted of making indecent images of children merited her dismissal for
misconduct.