Salam goes on to cite Jacob Vigdor, who tackled the problem of
teacher pay schedules for us in his 2008 article «Scrap the Sacrosanct Salary Schedule.»
Lawmakers rolled longevity pay, a salary supplement offered to teachers after 10 years of service, into the new
teacher pay schedule that was created to go with the teacher pay raises.
Rep. Hugh Blackwell, an influential Burke County Republican, also raised the prospect of ditching the state's
teacher pay schedule this week, pointing out North Carolina is one of just three states in the country that mandate a full salary schedule.
Not exact matches
The practice is generally discouraged, however, because temporary
teachers are not permitted to join a union (and hence are not eligible for
scheduled salary increases or benefits), and are
paid lower salaries.
Early in the 20th century, opposition to overt discrimination and demand for greater
teacher skills led to the current single - salary
schedule, which
pays the same salary to
teachers with the same qualifications regardless of grade level taught, gender, or race.
In Alabama, the state's «Race to the Top» application originally proposed merit
pay and a «new salary
schedule that would give more money to math, science and special - education
teachers,» but that portion of the application was deleted, reported the Press - Register (Mobile), «after Alabama Education Association leader Paul Hubbert wrote state Superintendent Joe Morton a letter... opposing them»
In «Scrap the Sacrosanct Salary
Schedule,» Jacob Vigdor looks at how the current system of
teacher pay offers too few rewards for younger
teachers.
A strong, well - designed merit -
pay plan requires more than offering a bonus to high - performing
teachers while
paying the remainder according to the standard
schedule.
The union still has a salary
schedule, but
teacher evaluations determine base
pay.
Indeed, each individual
teacher is
paid according to local salary
schedules, which tend to give increases as
teachers age into the workforce.
Cohen and Walsh point out that it is state law which drives tenure policy and which frequently mandates much of the anachronistic step - and - lane
pay schedule as well as the restrictions on
teacher evaluation.
Despite a recent wave of reform, the vast majority of school districts nationwide continue to
pay teachers based on salary
schedules that fail to differentiate among
teachers based on their subject - area expertise.
What is remarkable is that Solmon, a former education dean, Jupp, a union leader, and Koppich, a «new union» advocate, agree that the debate is no longer whether to throw out the single salary
schedule by which most of our
teachers are
paid, but what to replace it with.
Most of that money was
paid out using traditional single - salary compensation
schedules, a system that typically
pays the same salary to all
teachers with the same level of education and number of years in the classroom.
A 1962 RAND Corporation study on
teacher pay described
teacher salary
schedules in the following way:
If a single - salary
schedule for a school district yields a large surplus of qualified applicants for elementary education, social studies, and physical education, but no qualified applicants in physics or speech pathology, is
teachers»
pay in this district adequate?
The salary
schedule rewarded
teachers for investing their time and personal funds in further education, and it ended the longstanding practice of
paying men more than women and white
teachers more than minorities.
For most of the century just past, and into the current one, school districts have
paid their
teachers according to a «single salary
schedule,» a
pay scheme that bases an individual
teacher's salary on two factors: years of experience (steps) and number of education credits and degrees (lanes).
Introduced in Denver and Des Moines in 1921, the single salary
schedule was meant to resolve the inequities of an era when women, minorities, and elementary school
teachers were
paid less than their counterparts.
Although a recent union election cast doubt on the durability of the arrangement, Cincinnati has become the first public school district in the country to scrap the traditional salary
schedule in favor of a system that
pays teachers according to their classroom performance.
But the state's salary
schedule largely determines the rewards
paid to
teachers across the state.
The lighter bars track the returns
paid out in the 2007 — 08 salary
schedule, relative to the salary for starting
teachers.
Even a
teacher entering the profession with a master's degree is better off under the evidence - based salary
schedule, even though it
pays no reward for the advanced degree.
The costs of
paying new
teachers on the evidence - based
schedule while keeping existing
teachers on the traditional
schedule would peak after 10 years, at which point savings associated with the flattened rewards for experience would begin to outweigh the costs of higher salaries to younger
teachers.
Since it is possible that student achievement is higher whenever
pay schedules are flexible, regardless of the connection to
teacher classroom effectiveness, I estimated the impact of each of these three sets of factors on math achievement.
Around the nation, most school districts and
teachers recognize that traditional
pay schedule for what it is — an imperfect system.
The discriminatory impact of this compromise lessened as the gender gap in master's degree attainment narrowed, and more subtle means of discrimination were hampered by nearly universal adoption of the uniform salary
schedule, with
teachers»
pay based only on experience and education.
A state arbitration panel in Connecticut recently ruled that Region 13, covering the towns of Durham and Middlefield, would have to
pay teachers more under a proposed block
schedule plan because
teachers would be required to teach six different courses a year instead of five courses.
In fact, their salary
schedules give
teachers an incentive to take these courses in order to increase their
pay, without their having any intention of becoming a principal.
The proposal freed school districts to adjust employee work assignments without negotiating with the
teachers union and promised to make objectives like merit
pay,
scheduling revisions, and tenure reform far more attainable.
Menomonee Falls and Greendale eliminated additional
pay for extra duties and froze
scheduled raises for
teachers who had reached certain professional - development goals.
«Effective»
teachers receive their
scheduled pay increases, while «ineffective»
teachers are immediately dismissed.
Florida's budget troubles have left the country's fourth - largest school district unable to
pay teachers for advancing on the salary
schedule or to offer cost - of - living raises.
Each
teacher is
paid according to a district - wide salary
schedule.
Secretary of Education Richard W. Riley suggests a year - round
schedule, automatically raising
teachers»
pay 20 percent for the added work time.
First, public school
teachers cling to unprofessional salary
schedules and terms of employment that make it impossible to
pay them based on their performance and market demand.
Now, with Republican governors like Scott Walker in Wisconsin and John Kasich in Ohio publicly taking on collective bargaining for public school
teachers, replacing strict salary
schedules with merit
pay, and introducing value - added measures into decisions about salaries and tenure, events have caught up to his message.
The superintendent's HR office does most of the vetting and placing, but it is shackled by the contract, by state licensure practices (which may be set by an «independent» — and probably union and ed - school dominated — professional - standards board), by seniority rules that are probably enshrined in both contract and state law, and by uniform salary
schedules that mean the new
teacher (assuming similar «credentials») will be
paid the same fixed amount whether the subject most needed at Lincoln is math or music.
But Elliott writes that the mayor's office began investigating earlier this month, when a
teacher complained that the school didn't
pay it's employees on the
scheduled date.
While the
teachers union came up with the idea for the 10 - year contract, Thompson said the union compromised on key issues such as keeping an unpopular two - tiered
pay schedule designed to
pay new hires at lower salaries.
The provocative study raises new questions about how recently revamped
teacher - evaluation systems — and
pay schedules linked to them — shape
teacher behavior.
Last week, lawmakers passed a state budget that they promised would offer
teachers an average 7 percent raise — but instead of boosting all
teachers»
pay by a simple percentage, a new salary
schedule is in place that offers younger, inexperienced
teachers big gains while shortchanging veteran
teachers who have gone to great lengths to build on their teaching credentials.
Nearly two - thirds of districts are not able to offer
pay incentives or differentiated
pay to
teachers — for example, cash bonuses, salary increases, or different steps on the salary
schedule — to reward or recruit
teachers.
They will receive the benefits of a higher salary
schedule, but they'll also be working for a distict
paying off $ 2.5 billion in past promises to
teachers.
Beginning with the 1998 - 99 school year, certified school nurses employed by public schools are
paid on the «G», master prepared
teacher's
schedule.
Last week, lawmakers passed a state budget that they promised would offer
teachers an average 7 percent raise — but instead of boosting all
teachers»
pay by a simple percentage, a new salary
schedule is in place that offers younger,...
The
pay schedule also keeps
teachers» salaries frozen for five years at a time.
Align alternate salary
schedules and performance
pay measures, create incentives for effective
teachers at hard - to - staff schools and provide additional compensation for effective and highly effective
teachers.
While many see merit in having a contract — establishing a forum to discuss issues with administration and standards for
pay, evaluations, and
scheduling — some
teachers feel the federation sometimes appears more interested in pushing its own agenda than tending to the needs of such a tiny school, Iskric said.
Seventy - one percent of those surveyed said
teachers should be
paid on the basis of their work, rather than on a standard salary
schedule, and 54 percent said a
teacher's salary should be «somewhat closely» tied to the achievement of his or her students.