A school's resources — everything from teacher salaries to curriculum to non-academic support programs — affect the quality of education it's able to deliver, but schools have no power to tax residents, and things like teacher salaries and
teacher placement policies are determined at the district level.
Not exact matches
When Mayor de Blasio first announced his plans to close the ATR pool, Schools Chancellor Carmen Farina pledged to do so without resorting to forced
placement — a
policy that allows the NYC Department of Education (DOE) to place a
teacher from the ATR pool at a school whether or not the principal wants to hire that
teacher.
He said, «Rethinking
policies around seat - time requirements, class size, compensating
teachers based on their educational credentials, the use of technology in the classroom, inequitable school financing, the over
placement of students in special education — almost all of these potentially transformative productivity gains are primarily state and local issues that have to be grappled with.»
The Commission will examine state and local
policies to increase parent and family engagement, including: how the school calendar meets the needs of students and families to optimize engagement such as parent -
teacher conferences and half - days; district and school - level
policies to address student attendance issues; access to information regarding
teacher effectiveness; and parental involvement in school
policies such as
placement of students in low - performing schools and in the classrooms of ineffective
teachers.
During his tenure in Delaware, his team focused on improving
policies and practices across the educator effectiveness continuum: educator preparation, licensure / certification, recruitment,
placement, evaluation, professional learning, and
teacher - leader career pathways.
As for
teacher assignment, that is a seperate issue and one that needs to be addressed through district
policy regarding
placement and seniority.
Earlier this month, Mayor de Blasio announced a change of
policy that would result in the forced
placement of 400
teachers from the ATR pool into schools across the city.
For instance, districts are concerned that their
placement policy may disadvantage low - income and minority students because these students tend to have lower test scores and because of potential bias in
teacher recommendations.
Three - quarters of Los Angeles principals surveyed by the National Council on
Teacher Quality, a research and policy group focused on teacher effectiveness, said they were unable to hire their teacher of choice because they needed to hire from the priority placemen
Teacher Quality, a research and
policy group focused on
teacher effectiveness, said they were unable to hire their teacher of choice because they needed to hire from the priority placemen
teacher effectiveness, said they were unable to hire their
teacher of choice because they needed to hire from the priority placemen
teacher of choice because they needed to hire from the priority
placement list.
One potential solution is implementing mutual consent
policies under which the
teacher seeking a new
placement and the principal of the receiving school agree to the transfer.
This 2011 report surveys recently passed
teacher evaluation
policies in five states and rates each on the law's strengths and weaknesses in
teacher evaluation design requirements, transparency and public reporting of evaluation data, principal autonomy over
teacher hiring and
placement, and the extent to which the law links
teacher evaluation results to key personnel decisions, including tenure, reductions in force, dismissal of underperforming
teachers, and retention.