Not exact matches
«Despite all these shortcomings in way in which GCSEs have been
reformed,
teachers and school leaders have continued,
as ever, to ensure that pupils receive high
quality learning experiences and can secure the best possible chance of exam success tomorrow.
As he launched the policy at the West Africa Senior High School in Accra today [Tuesday], the President said
quality teacher training was essential to achieving the educational
reforms to the fullest.
The first decade of the 21st century has also had a dominant strategy: incentive - based
reforms, such
as increasing competition among charter and district schools, merit - pay plans to improve
teacher quality, and school - level accountability based on testing.
Let us also try some promising hybrids, such
as the
Teacher Advancement Program, developed by the Milken Family Foundation, which enhances teacher professionalism in ways that also recall a number of the recommendations of A Nation at Risk and the latter - day «alternative view» of teacher quality
Teacher Advancement Program, developed by the Milken Family Foundation, which enhances
teacher professionalism in ways that also recall a number of the recommendations of A Nation at Risk and the latter - day «alternative view» of teacher quality
teacher professionalism in ways that also recall a number of the recommendations of A Nation at Risk and the latter - day «alternative view» of
teacher quality
teacher quality reform.
First, it should be conceded that Duncan has a great idea, rewarding states willing to undertake
reforms such
as launching high -
quality charter schools (while closing bad ones) and using data to evaluate
teacher effectiveness.
Despite persuasive evidence suggesting that a high -
quality curriculum is a more cost - effective means of improving student outcomes than many more - popular ed -
reform measures, such
as merit pay for
teachers or reducing class size, states have largely ignored curriculum
reform.
Instead of regarding
teacher unions
as an obstacle to
reform, a perspective I vehemently held for many years, I imagine
teacher unions serving
as a partner to improve
teacher quality, thus, improving student learning.
The release in January of the Teaching Commission's report, «Teaching at Risk: A Call to Action,» presents us with an opportunity to reconsider the importance of
teacher quality as a critical variable in the current effort to implement standards - based
reform and high - stakes accountability.
Still, the Massachusetts senator has outlined a series of education proposals, putting flesh on the
reform bones in some areas, such
as his plans for improving
teacher quality and...
The problem, NCTQ's Kate Walsh told me, is that
teacher quality has been ignored
as a
reform issue until fairly recently.
Education Next's Paul Peterson and Chester E. Finn, Jr. talk this week about whether
teacher quality is eclipsing accountability and choice
as a
reform strategy and what role research plays in this.
In order to achieve this, the Commission suggests the government should mandate all schools in the ten lowest performing local authorities to take part in area - wide programmes,
as well
as reform the training and distribution of
teachers across the country and create new incentives — including better starting pay — to get more of the highest -
quality teachers into the schools that need them most.
His version of
reform, judging by his record, centers on boosting
teacher quality and supporting students with added services such
as after - school programs.
Americans balk at some market - based
reforms, such
as paying more for
teachers who work in fields like math and science, where
quality teachers are in scarce supply.
For example, when vouchers were offered
as a
reform strategy directly against «doing what it takes to put a fully qualified
teacher in every classroom,» 84 percent of respondents voted for
teacher quality in contrast with 17 percent who voted for vouchers.
Universities have warned that
reforms to
teacher training courses could see high
quality teacher trainees turned away
as national limits are reached.
Second, TNTP does not view policy
reform efforts
as separate from the daily work of recruiting, training, and hiring high -
quality teachers, but rather
as an integral part of it.
But it's haphazard and the retirement
reforms are of varying
quality in terms of their utility
as retirement policy — eg saving money by making it harder for new
teachers to vest.
The parents union, along with the parent empowerment efforts of StudentsFirst's New York affiliate (which is helping families in the Big Apple's traditional district fight for school libraries
as well
as lobby for
teacher quality and other
reforms), is actively helping families do more than just have a voice.
Further education
reforms will be hampered by low
teacher quality as long
as the salaries of
teachers do not rise to a competitive level — the level that would attract many high -
quality applicants.
I don't think that the existence of cheating «gives tacit support to arguments that standardized testing should not be used in evaluating
teachers or for systemic
reform,» it seems to demonstrate the problems that occur when reformers use low
quality, and poorly administered, standardized tests
as the primary measure of
teacher quality.
TFA, suitably representative of the liberal education
reform more generally, underwrites, intentionally or not, the conservative assumptions of the education
reform movement: that
teacher's unions serve
as barriers to
quality education; that testing is the best way to assess
quality education; that educating poor children is best done by institutionalizing them; that meritocracy is an end - in - itself; that social class is an unimportant variable in education
reform; that education policy is best made by evading politics proper; and that faith in public school
teachers is misplaced.
Save for a few NAACP branches (including its affiliate in Connecticut, have stepped up in the discussions over Gov. Dan Malloy's school
reform effort, and advocated on behalf of Bridgeport mother Tanya McDowell, who will serve five years for trying to provide her child with a high -
quality school), the nation's oldest civil rights group offers nothing substantial on addressing issues such
as ending Zip Code Education policies, expanding school choice, addressing childhood illiteracy, and revamping how
teachers are recruited, trained, paid, and evaluated (especially when it comes to bringing more black men into the teaching profession).
According to a review by the National Council on
Teacher Quality, a Washington, D.C. - based reform group, 20 states in 2012 required student achievement as a significant part of judging teacher performance, including multiple states where student data accounts for 50 percent of an eval
Teacher Quality, a Washington, D.C. - based
reform group, 20 states in 2012 required student achievement
as a significant part of judging
teacher performance, including multiple states where student data accounts for 50 percent of an eval
teacher performance, including multiple states where student data accounts for 50 percent of an evaluation.
Earlier this month, plans from 16 states were approved and while these plans vary in specifics, many of the states focused on
reforming teacher preparation
as the key first step to improve
quality.
Let's be clear: The need for rigorous, college - preparatory curricula with strong content is
as critical an element in
reforming American public education
as advancing standards and accountability, overhauling
teacher quality, expanding school choice, bolstering Parent Power, improving school leadership and building robust data systems.
Apparently, Hess ignores the decade of research on other issues — from the expansion of school choice, to
teacher quality reform efforts, to even the work on the academic prospects of high - achieving students being conducted by Fordham and other outfits —
as well
as the focus of state and federal policymaking on such matters
as bullying and using schools to combat childhood obesity.
This is true, and it's a fine argument for focusing education policy efforts on sustainable
teacher quality reforms, such
as recruiting more academically talented young people into the profession, requiring new
teachers to undergo significant apprenticeship periods working alongside master educators, and creating career ladders that reward excellent
teachers who agree to stay in the classroom long - term and mentor their peers.
As Drew University professor Patrick McGuinn put it in 2015, «
Teacher quality has become the centerpiece of the Obama administration's education agenda» and of «contemporary school
reform.»
National Council on
Teacher Quality attributed the rapid pace of change to the Race to the Top, the federal government competition that had recession - addled states vie for money in exchange for implementing education reforms, such as teacher evalu
Teacher Quality attributed the rapid pace of change to the Race to the Top, the federal government competition that had recession - addled states vie for money in exchange for implementing education
reforms, such
as teacher evalu
teacher evaluations.
In Alabama, where the state sustained aggressive reading instruction and curriculum
reform (even
as it failed to overhaul
teacher quality and expand school choice), 33 percent of students read Below Basic, a 15 percent decline from nine years ago; the percentage of poor fourth - graders who were functionally illiterate declined by 16 percent in that same period, from 61 percent to 45 percent.
Notably, the «National Council on
Teacher Quality attributed the rapid pace of change to the Race to the Top, the federal government competition that had recession - addled states vie for money in exchange for implementing education reforms, such as teacher evaluations.
Teacher Quality attributed the rapid pace of change to the Race to the Top, the federal government competition that had recession - addled states vie for money in exchange for implementing education
reforms, such
as teacher evaluations.
teacher evaluations.»
He describes the nation's main education law
as an «impediment to
reform,» citing ESEA's outdated testing regimen, accountability measures, and
teacher quality determinations, all of which fail to align with the widely adopted Common Core State Standards
as well
as recent state efforts to overhaul their
teacher evaluation systems.
Given the presence of these groups, along with the presence of Alliance for Educational Justice (another group backed by AFT), it is little wonder why so much of the «manifesto» focuses on opposing choice and Parent Power,
as well
as calling for districts to stop hiring recruits trained by Teach For America, the
teacher quality reform outfit that has long been the bane of the Big Two's existence.
And the Obama administration has cited improving
teacher quality as one of four education -
reform areas it plans to target in particular.
These
reforms are improving
teacher and principal evaluation and support,
as well
as turning around low - performing schools and expanding access to high -
quality schools.