Sentences with phrase «teacher retirements»

"Teacher retirements" refers to when teachers, or educators, stop working at a school or education institution and leave their profession to enjoy their retirement years. Full definition
What are the likely trends going forward for the cost of teacher retirement benefits?
They found that even despite recent changes, many state teacher retirement systems are outdated and struggle to provide workers with an adequate benefit that meets the needs of today's workforce.
But that's not how most teacher retirement plans work.
The main difficulty in measuring the effect of teacher retirement on student achievement is that retirement decisions may both affect and be affected by student performance.
Given the substantial public investment in teacher retirement and the important goals of boosting teacher retention, such improvements are long overdue.
This fight over teacher pension funding raises an important philosophical question: Does money spent on teacher retirement count as education funding?
There are several different options for teacher retirement benefits that could deliver more equitable benefits on a cost - neutral basis.
Even if they do not adopt wholesale change, there are four steps states could take to immediately improve current teacher retirement systems.
Such plans are expensive: roughly 1 in 10 dollars spent on education nationwide goes toward teacher retirement benefits.
The rising cost of maintaining teacher retirement systems is part of the problem.
Because most states offer teacher retirement benefits based on their salary, states are extending the gender wage gap into retirement.
This translates to cheaper costs for the state, but at the price of teacher retirement security.
Tell your legislators to oppose any plans that will shift the cost of teacher retirement contributions from the state to cities and towns.
The aging of the teacher workforce and the possibility of an impending teacher retirement «crisis» are recurring topics in the media.
We're actually seeing teacher retirement benefit innovation from within public education.
It is a problem, particularly for teachers, that financial literacy and planning varies so widely since teacher retirement plans require a good deal of financial savvy to understand.
This brief uses a unique historical data set to analyze how states changed teacher retirement benefits from 1982 to 2012.
The authors estimate a structural model of teacher retirement using administrative panel data.
That's why our work on teacher retirement looks at the chances any particular teacher has of reaching various retirement milestones.
Most of these costs are due to rising pension debts, not to pay for actual teacher retirement benefits (see Figure 3 here).
It turns out that even 30 - plus year veteran teachers can be confused by complicated teacher retirement systems.
In a report released this week, we analyzed every state's teacher retirement plan.
By increasing flexibility and portability for teacher retirement benefits, we can ensure that teachers don't have to choose between working with kids and earning a healthy start on retirement saving.
But that's not the way current teacher retirement systems are designed.
Regardless of the model chosen, spending on teacher retirement should be counted as education funding since such investment can not be extracted from the state's general K - 12 budget.
Each individual school must make a detailed calculation, taking long - term factors into account such as teacher retirement benefits.
I remember the CEA president looking for re-election 9 years ago ran on indoor air quality, rather than running on a platform of securing guaranteed rights for teacher retirement funding.
In studying the simple and immensely practical question of how charter schools handle teacher retirement when state law allows them to opt out of the state's pension system, Podgursky and Olberg examine just how much rethinking charters are doing when it comes to the familiar, expensive, and binding routines of schooling — and what lessons that holds for schools more broadly.
The teachers union is also putting pressure on its pension managers, who oversee $ 3 trillion of teacher retirement savings, to push fund companies to shed gun - maker stocks, offer funds that specifically exclude gun - related investments or drop investment managers that refuse.
Malloy wants to transfer hundreds of millions in teacher retirement costs to many towns but gives those same towns no say in pension benefits.
«We use exogenous variation from an ERI program in Illinois in the mid-1990s to provide the first evidence in the literature of the effects of large - scale teacher retirements on student achievement.
I was out in Colorado last week for the launch event of the Colorado Pension Project, a new initiative raising awareness about teacher retirement insecurity in the state.
We focus our analysis on the 1989 — 90 through 1996 — 97 school years, because the earliest available data are from the 1989 — 90 school year, and in 1998 the Illinois legislature changed the teacher benefit formula in ways that could influence teacher retirement decisions.
Like the proverbial Pac - Man, rapidly rising teacher retirement costs are pushing out dollars that could be spent on teacher salaries.
But, even as the funded ratio dropped from 78 percent in 2006 to 54 percent funded in 2012, the average teacher retirement benefit increased from $ 37,241 in 2006 to $ 46,440 in 2012.
THe NY state teachers retirement fund has 108 billion — yea thats right BILLIION dollars in it — they have enslaved the taxpayer — and now they want to deprive the poorest children from having a chance of going to a functional private school — REALLY??? Unbelievable!
Other frequently cited explanations for shortages include teacher retirements (54 %), teachers leaving the district (34 %), reductions in class size (32 %), and the high cost of living (29 %).
When researchers looked to see whether teachers responded to this «Rule of 80,» they found a steep acceleration in teacher retirements right at that key juncture (see «Golden Handcuffs,» research, Winter 2010).
Podgursky, Costrell, and others have since drawn similar charts for a number of states, and they all show how teacher retirement accounts grow slowly over time, only to spike dramatically at various ages determined by state pension plan formulas.
If states and districts consider funding teacher retirements as separate from their investments in K - 12 education, it becomes much easier for legislators and governors to kick the funding liabilities down the road and leave them for others to sort out.
The proposal, subject to state lawmakers» approval, would also raise teacher retirement ages for new hires and eliminate a $ 12,000 yearly payment received by many current police and fire department retirees.
Collins notes with the constant turmoil and potential teacher retirements she's worried how the district will be able recruit and attract future city teachers.
If states adopted teacher retirement plans with less formulaic incentive structures, they would let teachers make retirement decisions that better matched their own unique circumstances.
If that is the case, our results yield information on the effect of ERI programs on student achievement, but it could be misleading to use them to predict the effects of the impending spike in teacher retirements due to the aging of the teacher workforce.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z