What does the Chicago
teachers strike mean for Obama and the Democrats as election time nears?
Not exact matches
Lear uses the example of a
teacher who is suddenly and inexplicably
struck with perplexity, not just about this or that aspect of teaching but about the very
meaning of teaching.
The second poll on the 24th June asked specifically about
teachers taking
strike action on the 30th June over changes to pblic sector pensions that «
mean teachers will have to work longer and pay more towards lower pensions.»
The one problem is that the Chicago
Teachers Union might
strike soon, which would
mean we'd likely lose his spring break to make up the «lost days.»
Even well -
meaning teachers can fail to assume the leadership mantle in their programs by making the wrong assumptions about their students, or
striking the wrong balance.
North Carolina
teachers» contracts, however, prohibit them from
striking, and when organizers realized that walking out of the classroom could
mean walking out of their jobs, plans changed.
And that's
meant publicly defending laws that
strike even many liberals as wrong - headed, such as requiring districts to lay off their most junior
teachers first, regardless of how effective they are in the classroom.
The loss of most collective bargaining rights for
teachers and other public employees would almost certainly
mean more frequent walkouts and
strikes, she said.
I
mean, the issue in the Chicago
strike — one of the issues — was that Rahm Emanuel wanted a longer school day and the
teachers said we want a better school day.
Although the books
strikes me as a little text - heavy for the younger members of that set, it's
meant to be one that
teachers and students use together to explore how scientists gather data about the natural world, and analyze it for clues on global warming's progress and impacts.