Dean Benbow: Our National Center on Performance Incentives conducted a three - year scientific experiment in Nashville in which we paid
teachers substantial bonuses based on student test scores.
Not exact matches
Teachers rated «ineffective» are dismissed; those whose performance is rated as «minimally effective» have one year to improve; and teachers who are rated «highly effective» receive large bonuses and the potential for substantial increases in b
Teachers rated «ineffective» are dismissed; those whose performance is rated as «minimally effective» have one year to improve; and
teachers who are rated «highly effective» receive large bonuses and the potential for substantial increases in b
teachers who are rated «highly effective» receive large
bonuses and the potential for
substantial increases in base pay.
[5] The largest
bonus was
substantial, $ 15,000 a year, for
teachers whose performance was in the top five percent of
teachers based on historical district data.
The tight budgetary environment played a big supporting role in the D.C. contract, in which
teachers got a 21.6 % salary boost and a bucket of
bonus dollars in return for
substantial concessions on job protections, seniority, and merit pay.
For example, last year, I wrote about a federally financed initiative that, at least initially, improved
teacher - retention rates for
teachers who transfered to low - achieving schools and received a
substantial bonus.