Sentences with phrase «teaching about sex»

In particular, there needs to be stronger teaching about sex education in science, in order that young people have the knowledge and skills to make safe and fully informed decisions.

Catholic proponents of traditional teaching about sex have also opposed the arms race and have advocated for the poor and the environment.

Like me, many choose to live out what the Church has always taught about sex, namely that it is a good gift from God that is only for marriage between a woman and a man.

The Catholic Church has much to teach about sex, and the emphasis is not on denial.

As a parent, you need to be fully aware of what your teen is taught about sex at school.

Teachers are not, and I know this because my husband is an academic administrator here in North Carolina he was also an academic administrator in Chicago public school and that was something that I was working in Chicago public schools is because in health education we teach about sex, we teach about STI's we teach about all these other public health issues.

«New York City parents have a right — under federal law — to know exactly what their children are being taught in school, yet the Department of Education seems to be hiding what it plans to teach about sex and that begs the question «why?»

The skinny on blind people blind dating Things Blind People Can Teach You About Sex - Cosmopolitan What does Legally Blind Mean?

Michael teaches about sex and open relationships to couples, parents and men.

With its blend ofhonesty, humor, and technology, Midwest offers an accessible, upbeat alternative to what schools generally teach about sex — if they teach anything at all.

It will also explore how parents expect their children to be taught about sex and relationships in a «safe and age - appropriate way», and what children think they need to understand, and the online risks they are concerned by.

Out of over 1,000 college students were asked if their parents taught them about sex and money management.

You could ask them about what their parents taught them about sex, how to know when you're in love, how to know when to have sex, and how to protect yourself from pregnancy and STDs.

Sometimes I'm asking them to teach me about sex.

Youth today are absorbing porn in greater quantities than ever before and at younger ages, along with the harmful values porn teaches about sex and relationships — values that are the direct opposite of those that contribute to a healthy marriage culture.

I recently saw a BuzzFeed video exploring what driver's ed would be like if we taught people how to drive like we teach them about sex.

Not exact matches

While at Stanford, Spiegel sent emails about advising his frat brothers on how to get sorority girls drunk (Jell - O shots) and spent a lot of his time wondering whether his teaching assistant had even been urinated on during sex.

And the Church teaches that the freedom of religion may not be infringed by government mandates that persons act contrary to what their consciences tell them about the truth of such things as the sanctity of life, the dignity of marriage, and the reality of sex as the basis of «gender.»

«But on the other hand, I worry about LGBT people... because the church teaches you that you can not reach your full potential and have full acceptance in the church unless you marry someone of the opposite sex.»

Despite the fact that I once taught a course (one credit, for freshmen) on love, sex, and politics from Aristophanes to Bill Clinton, I wasn't going to say anything about Anthony Weiner's peccadillos.

The authors write, «Christians have too often been silent about biblical teaching on sex, marriage, and family life.»

19:3 - 12) Jesus opens his teachings about life in the kingdom of heaven with a discussion of personal morality as it relates to sex and the use of one's sexual endowments.

The news of including teaching about same - sex relationships has not gone down well with those who consider sexuality a moral issue which parents will have different views on.

New proposals will likely include more education on transgenderism and same - sex relationships as well as changes to include teaching about the dangers of pornography and sexting.

The Utah compromise, and the conference address by Elder Oaks, have led some to think that Latter - Day Saints teaching was about to undergo some kind of evolution on the question of same - sex marriage.

Among other controversial teachings of the Church, he developed a much needed line of thought about the sacramentality of the sexes in the plan of God (more fully outlined in Sexual Order and Holy Order, Faith Pamphlets).

Volunteers within the charity attributed the ignorance about reproduction to traditional Christian teachings, where girls learn that talk of sex is shameful or forbidden.

Perhaps there's a difference between teaching a child (boy or girl) that sex can cause babies and disease, and should be reserved for committed, adult relationships, and telling them that sex outside of marriage is «bad» without explaining what is bad about it.

One other point about sex: I wonder if part of the problem is that the church has a tendency to teach people the importance of virginity, but not chastity.

Surely you're not saying that teaching sex only within marriage was the cause of her shame, because if so ANY teaching about «safer» sex would have had the same result... because she was used she would have still felt used.

Christians wish to minister to these kids — by teaching them the norms about men and women, about sex and marriage, that have brought decency to the lives of ordinary people for millennia.

Cardinal Burke said: «I must say sincerely, even though I haven't read the words of the Pope, that I don't see why the Church ought to ask forgiveness for teaching the truth about sex and sexuality.»

Indeed, if the teachings of the churches are properly understood, it becomes apparent that the good found in these relations in fact derives from what Christians have to say about the goods of the sexual division, the goods of sex, and the goods of marriage itself.

Jeremy Myers, i think you are wrong and David is right, so many out there are preaching you can live any way you want and be right that Grace covers any sin, they really believe that, that is not what the bible says, God was very concerned about sin so much he sent Jesus his son to die on a cross for us, if we accept Jesus as our savor then we are to obey his commandments, not break them, we are to live a righteous and holy life as possible, the bible plainly list a whole list of things if we live in will not to to heaven unless we repent, if we die while in these sins, we will not go to heaven, what is the difference, between someone who said a prayer and someone who did not, and they are living the same way, none, i think, if we are truly saved it should be hard to do these things let alone live and do them everyday, i would be afraid to tell people that it does not matte grace covers their sins, i really think it is the slip ups that we are convicted of by the Holy Spirit and we ask for forgivness, how can anyones heart be right with God and they have sex all the time out of marriage, lie, break every commandment of God, i don't think this is meaning grace covers those sins, until they repent and ask for forgiveness, a lot of people will end up in hell because preachers teach Grace the wrong way,, and those preachers will answer to God for leading these people the wrong way, not saying you are one of them, but be careful, everything we teach or preach must line up with the word of God, God hates sin,

Gadamer, of how the inspired text, which we question in order to find its meaning and relevance, questions, criticizes, challenges and changes us in the process -» Some who today raise the proper question, whether there are not culturally relative elements in Paul's teaching about role relationships (an the material has to be thought through from this standpoint), seem to proceed improperly in doing so; for in effect they take current secular views about the sexes as fixed points, and work to bring Scripture into line with them - an agenda that at a stroke turns the study of sacred theology into a venture in secular ideology.

Once parents are relieved of any understandable fears about having to teach their young children how to have sex, it will be easier to convince them of the importance of exercising their God - given role as educators in chastity.

We must teach consent, communication, grace, love, and healthy boundaries in talking about sex.

So, there is clear and unambiguous teaching about the wrongfulness of sex outside of marriage, the good of marriage and procreation, and the wrongfulness of abortion, euthanasia and reproductive technology.

So to make sense of «the Church's teaching - God's teaching actually» about sex and loving he would imagine listening to two experts, to two young lovers who have just had sex for the first time, who were two real lovers, who want the best for each other.

Sometimes parents themselves, bombarded with nannying advice about how they should teach their children to be «safe», feel that they are letting their children down if they don't give their ten year old explicit sex instruction.

The CENTURY addressed other personal sins and moral failings, regularly speaking to the problems caused by lax divorce laws, and occasionally writing about the evils of gambling, tobacco, and the «sex consciousness» that would accompany the «vociferous demand for the teaching of sex hygiene» in public schools.

Agents of the state can teach your children how to have sex, give them condoms, put them on the pill, give them the morning - after pill if it doesn't work, and take them off for an abortion if that fails - and all without you having any say in the matter or necessarily even knowing about it.

Although there has been some push back on the new sex ed curriculum for public schools, which would see teaching about family diversity that includes LBGT families, anti-homophobia instruction including that being gay is normal, and — at long last!

No primary school need have any formal sex education at all and secondary schools need only teach about AIDS and venereal diseases, something they could do quite easily.

«The teaching of the church about the duty and right to give sex education is clear: only parents have this duty and right by nature.

Many couples have honest questions about sex and various sexual acts but struggle to find a pastor willing to teach on these topics.

As a deeply spiritual act, it's important for people to understand what the Bible teaches (and doesn't teach) about sex, to be able to speak openly and honestly with their ministry leaders regarding sex, and to find solid, biblical teaching on sex.

We must be honest and forthright about the Church's teachings, but this honesty is a manifestation of an intense love and concern for our brothers and sisters who experience same - sex attraction.

Gary Bauer, undersecretary of education and chairman of a White House task force on the American family, has been quoted as saying that his group's goal is «to tell children [that premarital sex] is wrong and explain why it's bad for them — not to teach them so much about sex that they can engage in it in early adolescence.»

These schools are complying with government requirements (at the time of writing, see Eric Hester's «Sex Education or Chastity Education: Church Teaching and Civil Law», in Faith, July 2007) to teach SRE, at the same time as upholding their Catholic ethos and protecting children from premature details about sSex Education or Chastity Education: Church Teaching and Civil Law», in Faith, July 2007) to teach SRE, at the same time as upholding their Catholic ethos and protecting children from premature details about sexsex.