Not exact matches
In theory, nothing is stopping big companies from taking the same strategy
approach as startups
do, as I
teach in my seminar «Three Ways to Get Back Your Company's Start - upness» at Babson College's Executive Education Center.
This made some sense to me since this would fit the category of «
do - it - yourself»... the very hands - on,
do - it - yourself
approach to making money we
taught.
I thought that when a Christian
does wrong, you should first
approach them, and try to
teach them, and understand the issue.
Even as a young Catholic student I was always
taught that, while giving up something for Lent is a way to mimic Jesus» 40 days of fasting before his death, a more modern — and more true to the spirit of Jesus —
approach is to find a way to
DO something that has a positive impact on someone else and yourself.
But many conservatives complained that the statement watered down church
teaching and
did not accurately reflect their discussions here, where nearly 200 Catholic leaders are meeting to debate pastoral
approaches to modern family life.
Multiculturalism
teaches us to
approach the sacred things of others with respect, but we can
do this only if we ourselves are not estranged from the sacred, from God.
Classes get
taught in one long block of time per week, even in subjects in which that
approach clearly doesn't make pedagogical sense.
The third
approach is to treat Leviticus as a symbolic or allegorical system that has little or nothing to
do with sacrifices per se, but everything to
do with
teaching important lessons.
Whichever
approach you choose, it is important to note that while Scripture
does teach about getting blotted out of the Book of Life, this
does not ever refer to losing eternal life.
I think drama and story are crucial components for helping us move to that kind of
approach, but I also
do not think that all forms of study,
teaching (although more dialogical), and research all go out the window.
question by Sinsinawa Dominican Sister Erica Jordan, who not - so - subtly suggested that Ryan's
approach to healthcare reform, tax reform, and welfare reform was in conflict with the Church's social
teaching, the very Catholic Speaker replied that he completely agreed with Sister Erica that God is «always on the side of the poor and dispossessed»; the real question was, how
do public officials, who are not God, create public policies that empower the poor and dispossessed to be not - poor and not - dispossessed?
John Paul's
approach does not compromise with «modernity,» but is rather a modern yet unapologetic expression of the perennial
teachings of the Church.
So in the final chapter, Lanzetta questions post-Conciliar
approaches to ecumenism where the «dogmatic» (to
do with knowing the truth) is juxtaposed to the «pastoral» «which starts out from the historic and pragmatic fact, and on behalf of this aims at possible dialogue, without changing
teaching, but de facto neither improving understanding of it, but even with the risk of altering its significance by virtue of the dialogue method chosen...».
Nevertheless, logically and practically, I
do think that the best way to
approach Scripture is book - by - book, verse - by - verse, both in our reading and in our
teaching.
One of the chief problems with Childs's
approach — not usually discussed by scholars — is pedagogical and has to
do with the present climate of Old Testament
teaching.
Do I view Jesus through the supposedly objective
approach of the university as one figure among others who held and
taught idiosyncratic and now outdated ideas?
It's no secret that I've expressed concerns over Driscoll's
teachings and antics in the past, particularly those that encourage the bullying of men who don't fit into Driscoll's macho - man mold, but I tried to
approach this book with an open in mind, and indeed I found some pleasant surprises in Real Marriage.
It will be seen that it is negative so far as the
teaching of Jesus is concerned, but that it
does seem to offer promise as an avenue of
approach to the whole problem of the formation of christological traditions in the early Church.
I've listened to my sisters grieve over how they never knew how to say no when they were
approached by sexual predators, because they didn't know they had the basic human right to
do so after being
taught things like first - time obedience and assuming the best about those in authority no matter what (because God put them in authority, so they have inside info on God's will).
Unlike inward - facing fundamentalist
approaches to education, this movement
does not shy away from the world, but instead
teaches students to interact thoughtfully with contemporary culture.
When lapsed parents
approach us to have their child baptised, or lapsed couples for marriage, it is very rare that this is
done merely for social reasons — that they just want a party (I think on these occasions a priest may well have to make a stand — but only after he has ascertained that they would not be open to some
teaching about the Faith).
If this means that the Old Testament is being
taught in such schools today as a part of theology it
does not mean that the historical and critical
approach to it is ignored or that inspiration and devotion have taken the place of scholarship.
In fact, Frontal Agritech's slogan «Redesigning Agriculture» doesn't refer to any high - tech
approach, but to organizing farms in their area and
teaching their owners traditional farming, using organic techniques wherever possible.
The fact that each baby is different means there is no magic
approach that will
teach all babies to sleep, but even if it is hard to figure out how to get a baby to sleep, I still don't feel right leaving a baby to cry to sleep alone.
So
does this mean that if we want to promote secure attachment between stressed - out parents and stressed - out infants, the best
approach is essentially informational:
teaching parents the techniques and behaviors that are most likely to lead to a secure attachment?
Before I had a kid on my own, I imagined that somehow only kids that are spoiled are the ones that cry, act out and throw tantrums and that maybe their parents didn't have the right
approach or the appropriate attitude to fix the issue or
teach the kid that that's not right..
But that doesn't mean they can't learn most or even all of those skills with the right
teaching approach.
A one - size - fits - all
approach to
teaching doesn't fit everyone because no two students are exactly alike.
Helping kids develop mental strength requires a three - pronged
approach:
teaching them to replace negative thoughts with more realistic thoughts, helping them learn to control their emotions so their emotions don't control them, and showing them how to take positive action.
However, this article is going to share why this is exactly what you should be
doing and we're going to
teach you one of the best
approach.
This book is not only great for kids, but great for parents as it
teaches you how to communicate with your kids and take a more empathetic
approach to helping them deal with their overwhelming emotions that they don't always know how to express properly.
However, officials note that «the current inspection framework is antithetical to the Steiner ethos / pedagogical
approach» in terms of «Literacy in Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS) and Key Stage 1 (KS1)», where Ofsted required «more formal learning»; «KS2 tests», as «Last year, the Academy pupils
did not sit the tests (the Academy provided the exam papers and rooms for pupils to sit the exams but parents chose not to allow their pupils to sit the tests)»; and «
Teaching and learning», where it is noted that the schools consider that «any process which judges learning as the immediate outcome from teaching in a lesson is inappr
Teaching and learning», where it is noted that the schools consider that «any process which judges learning as the immediate outcome from
teaching in a lesson is inappr
teaching in a lesson is inappropriate.
Next, although science may come closer to universality than any other human activity, there are distinct local variations, as scientists adapt to local constraints and
approach science with ways of thinking that are influenced by local culture, and these different ways of
doing science can
teach us things.
Findings suggest that simply telling learners that they would later
teach another student changes their mindset enough so that they engage in more effective
approaches to learning than
did their peers who simply expected a test.
The Oshawa - based school is betting that it can attract some of the best students and researchers with what it considers a fresh
approach to
teaching and
doing science.
The Centre for Interdisciplinary Science was set up in 2005 to develop new
approaches to the
teaching of undergraduate university science through real world problems, such as climate change, which
do not fit into a single scientific discipline and require research across subject specialisms.
Teaching doctoral students and postdocs good scientific practice (GSP):
Do individually different
approaches lead to a different willingness in accepting GSP rules?
«Since the Ashtanga practice is very breath - oriented, in a sense you're
doing a kind of pranayama from the moment you begin the practice,» says Tim Miller, who has been
teaching this
approach to yoga for more than two decades.
it's something i
do when helping traumatised women
approach their next labours (i'm a hypnobirthing
teaching) and i've seen disempowered, frightened women become amazons, and have beautiful easy births.
My Dad tried to
approach the local women's team, but they didn't have time to
teach a kid how to play.
I'll
teach you how to
approach beautiful women in person too but don't worry, you won't be asking random women for their numbers — I've got a much easier, more natural strategy.
He lands a
teaching post at MIT along with two schoolchums (Adam Goldberg and Anthony Rapp) and a mysterious government worker William Parcher (Ed Harris)
approaches him about
doing some code - breaking work to defend the U.S. against the evil commies.
I've
done this
approach with every class I've ever
taught, and it makes a big difference.
Until he experienced the cooperative learning
approach and practiced it, he didn't understand its implications for
teaching.
In addition, he will be
doing some training in authentic student instructional
approaches such as 6 + 1 Trait Writing and student portfolios, and he will establish an account to fund «floating» substitute teachers so teams of three teachers can take turns observing each other
teach.
A lot of our teachers though, when they're thinking about how
do we want to
teach, they really
do want to
do something for the students at the individual student level so hence the learner focused one, but it's not necessarily an autonomous learning or a problem solving
approach, it might be differentiation or targeted
teaching or something like that...
«I love how the curriculum focusses very much on
teaching transferable skills and not the old fashioned schemes of work
approach — it means the kids don't get bored or disengaged as there are always new challenges to meet.»
The power behind this
approach to student engagement is that it
teaches so many different skills, and students improve because they're
doing something that they care about.
It is important to remember that part of this
teaching approach is to allow the process to operate in the reverse order to the traditional way we
do this in school maths classrooms; practice some maths then apply that maths through a word problem — where the maths skills have already been identified and formulated for the student.
Ed — The standards
do not require any particular
approach to
teaching, but you are right, the research supports the idea of explicit skills
teaching, so I would definitely
do what Maureen says, stay to effective
teaching methods.