Two years ago the book The Fatherhood of God in an Age of Emancipation (Westminster, 1983); one year ago the forthcoming Inception and Formation of the World Council of Churches; and now this manuscript about the problem of
teaching authority in the church.
Not exact matches
On Luther's side, the final break with the
Church authorities came
in the wake of Leo X's bull of November 1518;
in that document, as Luther saw it, Leo arrogated to himself the power of defining
Church teaching without accountability to Scripture, the Fathers, or the ancient canons.
Evangelical Catholicism affirms divine revelation and embraces its
authority, which continues through history
in the
teaching authority of the
Church.
In communion with the body of faithful Christians through the ages, we also affirm together that the entire teaching, worship, ministry, life, and mission of Christ's Church is to be held accountable to the final authority of Holy Scripture, which, for Evangelicals and Catholics alike, constitutes the word of God in written form (2 Timothy 3:15 - 17; 2 Peter 1:21
In communion with the body of faithful Christians through the ages, we also affirm together that the entire
teaching, worship, ministry, life, and mission of Christ's
Church is to be held accountable to the final
authority of Holy Scripture, which, for Evangelicals and Catholics alike, constitutes the word of God
in written form (2 Timothy 3:15 - 17; 2 Peter 1:21
in written form (2 Timothy 3:15 - 17; 2 Peter 1:21).
Iniatially, the Magisterial (
Teaching)
Authority of the Catholic
Church was collegial, the Pope
in union with the Bishops.
The council also led to a renewal of the liturgy, an affirmation of religious freedom and the primacy of conscience, a rejection of
church - state unions, an openness to the truth of other religions (especially Judaism) and a renewed sense that the
church's
teaching authority resides
in all of the faithful, not exclusively
in the hierarchy.
However, it is essential that they are given a thorough grounding
in what the
Church teaches and especially the reasons why it does so and with what
authority.
Sure, the
church you attend... whatever,... but the religion you believe
in teaches right from wrong and claims a connection to, or understanding of, or words directly from, the supposed ultimate moral
authority does it not?
When the practicing Christian talks to modern man about the «Law of God,» the «
Teaching of the
Church,» or invokes the
authority of Holy Scripture, he is to his own mind bringing out the heaviest weapons
in his armory.
Integral Christian living means (i) being part of Jesus's family (i.e. being
in «Communion» with the Holy Trinity, physically and spiritually), through having the actual touch of Christ
in Baptism, Confirmation and Communion, and (ii) receiving his
Teaching through the Church's magisterium (i.e. «teaching authority&
Teaching through the
Church's magisterium (i.e. «
teaching authority&
teaching authority»).
There need not be truly subjective guilt either
in the case of the individual or of a social group, even when the subjective conscience is confronted with the official
teaching of the
Church as a formally binding
authority.
We need to
teach on submission and
church authority structures
in a way that equips women abused by the very leadership to which they were called to submit to boldly live out their gifting as co-heirs with Jesus Christ.
The
Church for them is not only the sacramental intermediary of grace and the
teaching authority for the true statement of the hidden mysteries of God, but also has a pastoral power by which it can contribute quite considerably to determining the concrete action of its members
in the tangible and sober reality of everyday life.
Church authority has added to its problems by failing to recognize explicitly the somewhat provisional nature of its
teaching in these areas.
He describes
in characteristically straightforward language Protestantism's crisis of
authority and its need for real shepherds: «The
Church must have not only normative sources written down on paper but also authoritative officeholders ordained to
teach the whole
Church.»
A close Nerbal study of such writings as the Epistle of James, the First Epistle of John, and the ethical sections of most of the Pauline Epistles, is needed to show how deeply embedded
in the
teaching of the early
Church was the tradition of the words of Jesus which gave
authority to it all.
The grounds on which
church authorities resisted the advancing claims of the sciences were
in the first place simply that they were at variance with the accepted
teachings handed down from ancient times.
But the
church in particular thought that its
teaching possessed incontestable
authority because it had been received
in ancient times by divine revelation.
I know many complementarians who, although they believe men should hold
authority over women
in the home,
church, and society, make an exception for the marriage bed, acknowledging the Apostle Paul's
teachings on mutuality
in this regard (1 Corinthians 7:1 - 5).
Taken together, they argue for «change» but,
in the hands of O'Malley, with a wary glance upon the inherited tradition of the
Church, earlier conciliar authenticity and the
authority of papal
teaching.
I do not permit a woman to
teach or to assume
authority over a man; she must be quiet» and then they silence women
in the
church...
in a well - meaning way.
Every thoughtful person has understood that the pro-life position - explicitly and consistently articulated by the Catholic
Church at every level of
teaching authority - is that justice requires that every unborn child be cared for andprotected
in law.
In Genesis 3, the woman usurped authority over her husband and took the lead in the Fall, and is now forbidden to do so in the local church by teaching Scriptures to me
In Genesis 3, the woman usurped
authority over her husband and took the lead
in the Fall, and is now forbidden to do so in the local church by teaching Scriptures to me
in the Fall, and is now forbidden to do so
in the local church by teaching Scriptures to me
in the local
church by
teaching Scriptures to men.
One indication of this is the emphasis
in recent
Church documents on obedience to the hierarchical
teaching authority and on the relationship between hierarchical superiority and subordination.
In such a case, if it exists, the scientist would, of course, be compelled to withdraw his assent to the legitimate teaching authority of the Church, if it were supposed that he really considered the certainty of the scientific «result» as definitively truer and surer than the grounds which he had previously believed he possessed in justification for the claim of the Church to teac
In such a case, if it exists, the scientist would, of course, be compelled to withdraw his assent to the legitimate
teaching authority of the
Church, if it were supposed that he really considered the certainty of the scientific «result» as definitively truer and surer than the grounds which he had previously believed he possessed
in justification for the claim of the Church to teac
in justification for the claim of the
Church to
teach.
Can the
church teach with clarity and
authority in a responsible relationship to its own past?
But if someone believes that he can not and should not accept the
authority of the Gospel, of Scripture and of the
teaching office of the
Church he can not consider himself a Catholic, he can not be a partner
in the dialogue that takes place within the
Church and which presupposes the acceptance of her
teaching office
in as far as it claims to have
authority.
But the Christian scientist as such
in his own sphere is bound as a matter of principle and method by the
Church's magisterium as the higher and more comprehensive
authority,
in the sense that even as a scientist he may not affirm as established with certainty by his science something which would involve a definite contradiction of a doctrine
taught officially by the
Church as certain (Denzinger 1656, 1674 ff., 1681, 2085).
First of all it should be noted that one should never harm the consciences of children
in going against
Church teaching merely to obey the law: «Our fathers chained
in prisons dark were still
in heart and conscience free» and better to be thus than to be applauded by the Local
Authority advisers and
teach what is wrong.
The further claim being made here — that God can ask me, through my conscience, to do things that do not cohere with the
teaching of the
Church — fractures the bonds between God, the
Church's
teaching authority, and conscience
in perilous ways.
The Encyclical Ut unum sint lists among the five still controversial areas: «I) the relationship between Sacred Scripture, as the highest
authority in matter of faith, and Sacred Tradition, as indispensable to the interpretation of the Word of God,» and «4) the Magisterium of the
Church, entrusted to the Pope and the Bishops
in communion with him, understood as a responsibility and an
authority exercised
in the name of Christ for
teaching and safeguarding the faith.»
There is an acknowledged difference between Catholic and evangelical participation,
in that Catholic participants are bound by and determined to be faithful to the central
teaching authority, or Magisterium, of the Catholic
Church.
Toward the end of Ut Unum Sint, John Paul cites some of the questions that must be addressed
in conversation with the communities issuing from the tragic divisions of the sixteenth century: (1) The relationship between Sacred Scripture, as the highest
authority in matters of faith, and Sacred Tradition, as indispensable to the interpretation of the Word of God; (2) The Eucharist as the Sacrament of the Body and Blood of Christ, an offering of praise to the Father, the sacrificial memorial and Real Presence of Christ and the sanctifying outpouring of the Holy Spirit; (3) Ordination, as a Sacrament, to the threefold ministry of the episcopate, presbyterate, and diaconate; (4) The Magisterium of the
Church, entrusted to the pope and the bishops
in communion with him, understood as a responsibility and an
authority exercised
in the name of Christ for
teaching and safeguarding the faith; (5) The Virgin Mary, as Mother of God and Icon of the
Church, the spiritual Mother who intercedes for Christ's disciples and for all humanity.
From that shocking conviction of faith, Luther was able to go forth
teaching, preaching, raising a family, running from
authorities, sulking
in protective custody
in two castles, translating the Bible, writing hymns, eating and drinking with students and colleagues, maladministering the new congregations of evangelicals, struggling for freedom, devising pragmatic polities for the
churches, becoming a public and political figure, defying pope and emperor and developing a Christ - centered theology.
Now it is no way apparent how such an opinion can be reconciled with that which the sources of revealed truth and the documents of the
Teaching Authority of the
Church propose with regard to original sin, which proceeds from a sin actually committed by an individual Adam and which, through generation, is passed on to all and is
in everyone as his own.»
Generis: «For these reasons the
Teaching Authority of the
Church does not forbid that,
in conformity with the present state of human sciences and sacred theology, research and discussions, on the part of men experienced
in both fields, take place with regard to the doctrine of evolution,
in as far as it inquires into the origin of the human body as coming from pre-existent and living matter - for the Catholic faith obliges us to hold that souls are immediately created by God» [italics added].
One who affirms a doctrine of apostolic succession culminating
in the
authority of the bishop of Rome must not only choose between succession of
teaching or succession of office (as J. B. Lightfoot
in his own day understood), but also surmount the historiographical difficulty posed by the early
Church's transition from apostles to presbyters, and from presbyters to a single monarchical bishop.
She was not a pastor or preacher and did not
teach or have
authority over men
in a
church.
Craig maybe the definition of
teaching men under
authority is limited to that particular area within the
church.But that does nt stop God from working outside those constraints.Mother Etta and no doubt other women felt compelled to preach the gospel such as women missionaries.Mother Etta preached the gospel and many were saved people were healed just as
in the day of the disciples it is the same Jesus that saves and delivered from from sin and disease not the fact that it was a man who spoke behind the altar.Why do you find it hard to see that God can use women just like he uses men to witness for him.The call to witness for Christ is for everyone not just men and not just
in a
church situation.When we limit God to a narrow view it limits the effectiveness of the gospel.
I read this article by charisma magazine which i thought was well written which is pro Women preaching http://www.charismamag.com/blogs/fire-
in-my-bones/16851-why-i-defend-women-preachers This debate is an on going one John Piper who i respect as a bible preacher believes that scripture is clear women shouldnt have
authority over men or
teach in the
church some go as far as saying women shouldnt preach
in sunday school if the classes are mixed.Personally i think times are changing and i say that because i have a women manager she has
authority over me and other men so if we follow the biblical example i shouldnt allow myself to be
in that situation which is just crazy thinking.
V. 38 Paul states that if one doesn't acknowledge his
teaching as authoritative, then that person should be considered as one having no
authority to speak on spiritual things (he has
in mind false teachers or
church rebels who would oppose his
teaching).
The principal of sola scriptura and the rejection of the
Church's
teaching authority in the end, he thinks, led to a «market of values»
in which all certainties dissolved.
The pope is the head of the
Church, and if he thinks Catholic nuns,
in America or anywhere else, are advocating positions that are against the
teachings of the
Church, he has the
authority and the responsibility to investigate and as needed to terminate anti-Catholic activities
in the Catholic
Church.
In the view of many thoughtful Catholics, the failure to address effectively the scandal of Catholic politicians who publicly reject the
Church's
teaching on the gospel of life is gravely undermining the credibility of episcopal
authority.
Either the
Church and the Pope who leads her have the
authority to
teach in Christ's name or they don't.
But does this authorization of the
Church by Christ really mean anything if the
teaching of the
Church has
authority only
in so far as it is corroborated by Scripture, and if the
Church does not have the final say about whether a certain
teaching is corroborated by Scripture or not?
The authors disarmingly look for lessons that can be drawn by evangelicals from the reasons given by former evangelicals who have gone «home to Rome»: a richer worship, a greater depth
in history, a religious certainty, an identifiably united
Church, a firm
teaching authority.
Another example of this is the way that some
teach that women can not take any kind of leadership
in the
church on the basis of the Greek word authentein
in 1 Timothy 2:12, a word which is found nowhere else
in the New Testament and is very rare
in Greek as a whole, and which never seems to mean simply «have
authority» as some people insist it means.
Even for the Catholic the road from the general principles of Christian ethics to concrete decision has become considerably longer than formerly, even when he is determined unconditionally to respect all those principles, and for a good part of the way,
in the last decisive stages of the formation of the concrete moral imperative, he is therefore inevitably left by the
Church's
teaching and pastoral
authority more than formerly to his own conscience, to form the concrete decision independently on his own responsibility.
Male
authority that does not stand up for women,
teach about women, tell stories of women
in the
church.