Sentences with phrase «teaching focuses not»

As we have seen, Wright advocates a view in which Christian teaching focuses not on life after death but «life after life after death,» which includes the resurrection of the body and the redemption of the created order.

Not exact matches

Steve Jobs taught me to approach business in a way that isn't focused on money.

While the Dalai Lama, a Buddhist monk, does not often speak about business explicitly, choosing instead to focus on teachings about compassion and peace, he sounded a lot like an aging CEO preparing to pass the reins.

It really taught me to stay focused on what we do well and not listen to the [naysayers].»

Enjoy watching your capable, experienced teachers as they work with youngsters 20 months to 14 years, knowing that they're teaching not only art, but the ability to focus and to make independent decisions — a skill many adults lack!

Bladow says that his experience with BloomThat has taught him about accountability, how not to be thrown by the things beyond your control and focus on what you can tackle right in front of you.

There is an argument that we don't need yet another wearable to teach us that a lack of deep sleep will affect our memory, focus, and judgment.

Be sure that all the training you provide (or arrange for) not only teaches the mechanics of the job, but also focuses on doing the work in value - driven ways.

Stop searching for shortcuts and secrets; focus instead on the simple things your parents and grandparents taught you, such as not to spend more money than you make.

He taught generations of managers the importance of picking the best people, of focusing on opportunities and not problems, of getting on the same side of the desk as your customer, of the need to understand your competitive advantages, and to continue to refine them.

Waits» music not only teaches us about our own brokenness, it serves to bring people who should be the focus of our attention, our mercy and our kindness back into the limelight.

«A church that puts its faith into action focuses not on themselves but on Christ's teaching and his divine example of compassion,» says Zondervan's director of church engagement.

If the church focused on teaching people to be moral by upholding bible principles instead of their own traditions, they wouldn't have to be concerned.

It makes for a heartfelt atmosphere but isn't as intimate or as Father - focused as the teaching.

While we have not been able to buy into any of these titles in our common sense reconstruction, we do use the messianic title of «the Christ», redefined to mean the one through whose life and teachings we interpret God, the one through whom we find focus and meaning for our lives.

Most churches can and will show you how to serve church, but they are not very focused on teaching you how to serve Christ.

The most successful interpreters of the moral teaching of the NT have focused on the text's paradigms and «symbolic world» rather than on its rules and principles.

One is that most teaching and learning theories are based on the research and theory of modern psychology, which has not been focused primarily on complex forms of communication and reception.

The mouth group, however, should not tell the hand group that they need to focus more on teaching and preaching, and the hand group should not tell the mouth group that they need to focus more on serving and caring.

for one group that gathers on a certain day in a certain place to focus more on teaching and knowledge gifts, and not as much on service and evangelism, while another group at another place and time focuses on service and evangelism, but not as much on teaching and knowledge, and that from God's perspective, this is all okay?

What they do, how they live, who they love, who they worship or don't, what they teach their children is none of your business unless you are paying their way and given that you're not, you might wish to learn to focus on your own life and not that of others.

For one reason, his own interest was so centered in the new life in Christ through our Lord's death, resurrection, and living presence as the Spirit, that he did not focus attention on the details of Jesus» life and teaching.

We need to focus not on the numbers, but on the people already in our life, how God might want to use us to help and encourage them, and also what God might want to teach us through them.

But there are people who are so devoted to writing and teaching, neglecting all else, that they may well do more and better work than I — not because I couldn't match them if I were as narrowly focused as they, but because my energies and time are diffused more than theirs.

The authors are most helpful when they focus not on proof texts from Jesus» teaching but on our relationship of praise and devotion to the God incarnate in Jesus Christ.

Although the madness currently seizing Sudan and Algeria is not the focus of her book, one concludes Ye'or's brilliant monograph realizing how fragile the recognition of human rights can be and how long the road will be before all the globe admits what Vatican II taught: that the right to worship God according to one's conscience is an essential component to what it means to be a human being created by this same God» whom we all worship, however unawares.

There is little of Cullmann's work that did not focus on the early church, the topic he taught in both Basel and Paris.

As for 5th graders knowing more about the world, they don't respect 2 Timothy 3:15 and hence do not know Romans 12 - 2, as any practicing Christian would remind you that we are suppose to focus on the teachings of Jesus Truth and not the ways of this world.

At the Organic fellowship, obviously there were those who taught, but that wasn't the focus.

It's a teaching — a comparison to something not that flattering and calling to question the character and focus of the people he's addressing.

Our focus is not on teaching theological positions — but on exploring language, attitudes, relational postures, fostering hospitality in the midst of diversity etc..

The debate has not focused on pedagogical questions, on variations of the question, «What is the most effective way to teach in theological education?»

Even though I did not receive teaching from a Church setting but rather from a marketplace ministry setting where they taught us «Externally Focused Church, Organic Church, which was really a good thing (new wine skin initiatives) but when we implemented and embraced it, we found that its not quite effective and in the end the leaders abandoned the project and most of us were in the dark on what is the next good program or system to follow.

The task of educating children means teaching them the larger designs that could give form and focus to their individual and collective aspirations, so that they come to understand not only how to be good but why.

I would argue one point: Paul, Peter, and John's main focus was not trying to flesh out how the Church should live, but it was to teach and proclaim Christ and Him crucified for our sins.

But I also think there are many versions of Christianity that, even though Jesus is referenced, do not focus on Jesus, His teaching, or His example.

Our focus maybe not necessarily the F efficacy of the blood but the re education reclassification and putting the right focus on teaching the world about Jesus our father and the Holy Spirit the blood was part of this and explained properly puts this concept in correct perspective.

Whether religious or not, the teachings of Christ have a great deal of truth and that should be focus of the church.

Our Protestant brethren in Christ do not share the Catholic Church's teaching on contraception, and people say that it's best to focus on areas of agreement.

I think it's important to realize that other individual churches were never mentioned on the Grace Gospel Broadcast since the focus of the program was intentionally to stick to what the Bible teaches and not target individual churches, though the teachings of whole movements, such as the charismatic movement were sometimes addressed.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

In school I went off arty subjects because of the way they were taught, and the focus on traditional «fine art» wasn't really what I enjoyed.

The focus of this workshop is mindful awareness, something not usually taught in other childbirth education classes.

Understand that a consequence given without that focus is just a punishment that won't teach your child anything new.

Focus on teaching your child to behave because it's the respectful thing to do, not because he won't get rewarded on Christmas.

As a society, we teach women that it is not appropriate or «feminine» for them to focus on what they want, assert their own ambitions, and pursue their self - interest — and we don't like it when they do.

We found that most of the parenting books available either were too mainstream (unable to agree with what it taught), they were too parent - focused (not showing the teen side of things) or they were gender - neutral (not helping understand the dynamics of females).

If your child isn't old enough to focus on this, you can still demonstrate it to give them something to watch while they breathe, while also beginning to teach them a new skill they can use later.

The Prodigal Son's Brother is not normally focused on, in most bible teachings, but his part in this story can teach your children about forgiveness as well as being glad for others in the family.

This process definitely taught me to (try and) count my many blessings vs focusing on what I didn't have.