Attempts to use the law to restrict or dilute
the teaching of evolution in public schools matters because science matters.
Highly publicized reactions to science and social science on the part of religious conservatives, as evidenced by lawsuits concerning
the teaching of evolution in public schools and court cases challenging the influence of «secular humanism» on school textbooks, suggest that Habermas's forces of «secular rationality» have by no means carried the day.
According to Edward J. Larson's scholarly, informative, Pulitzer Prize - winning book, Summer for the Gods: The Scopes Trial and America's Continuing Debate Over Science and Religion, the prosecution of young John Scopes for presumedly violating a state law restricting
the teaching of evolution in the public schools need not have resulted in the now legendary high - pitched standoff between the atheistic radical Clarence Darrow and the robustly religious populist William Jennings Bryan.
But some science educators are worried that the seemingly innocuous referendum on the 7 August ballot, which passed overwhelmingly, could also undermine
the teaching of evolution in public schools.
The statute that got John Scopes in trouble back in 1925 was finally repealed in 1967 — but
the teaching of evolution in public schools is still not entirely safe
A: After their failure at the Scopes Trial (1925) to prevent
the teaching of evolution in the public schools, fundamentalists retired from the public domain and seemed to have disappeared.