Effects of teachers» mathematical knowledge for
teaching on student achievement.
The impact of effective
teaching on student achievement is cumulative.
Effects of Teachers» Mathematical Knowledge for
Teaching on Student Achievement (PDF).
Not exact matches
Harris - Tigg said with Paladino
on the board, it undermines
teaching and
student achievement.
Being
taught from a syllabus that's «a mile wide and an inch deep,» the report states, could be one reason why U.S.
students do relatively poorly
on international
achievement tests.
A new report from the Royal Society
on improving U.K. science and mathematics education contains a lengthy wish list: Upper - level
students should take a lot more science and math; more college graduates with science degrees should go into
teaching; current teachers should continually upgrade their skills and have a larger voice in the educational process; and the government should de-emphasize the high - stakes tests used to measure
student achievement.
On average, today's teachers are older and hence their preparation for
teaching occurred when academic
achievement was not recognized as the primary purpose of schooling; their professional experience was in institutions that did not demand academic performance from them or their
students.
«The teachers are [also] going to be learning how to plot
student achievement at one time
on a Guttman Chart and identify the Zones of Proximal Development, and target
teaching at those.»
«Reassessing the
Achievement Gap: Fully Measuring What Students Should Be Taught in School» argues that NAEP results offer a «distorted» picture of student achievement because of their exclusive focus on academic skills and take attention away from nontested areas that often fall under the purview
Achievement Gap: Fully Measuring What
Students Should Be
Taught in School» argues that NAEP results offer a «distorted» picture of
student achievement because of their exclusive focus on academic skills and take attention away from nontested areas that often fall under the purview
achievement because of their exclusive focus
on academic skills and take attention away from nontested areas that often fall under the purview of schools.
Ofsted's guidance
on effective self - evaluation highlights that it needs to be able to capture the impact of the school's actions
on the quality of
teaching,
students»
achievement, behaviour and safety.
However, high - performing countries tend to require high academic
achievement of entering teacher education
students, and then select
on the basis of skills and personal attributes required for effective
teaching.
Teachers / leaders believe that their fundamental task is to evaluate the effect of their
teaching on students learning and
achievement.
In her first year
on the job, Jewell - Sherman launched Excellence for All, a comprehensive plan aimed at improving
teaching and learning to enable
students to reach high academic standards, and promoting involvement with the community as a way of addressing nonacademic barriers to
student achievement.
This issue's research section offers a first - of - its - kind study examining the impact of instructor quality
on student achievement in the higher education sector — finding that
students taught by above - average instructors receive higher grades and test scores, are more likely to succeed in subsequent courses, and earn more college credits.
The Massachusetts Expanded Learning Time (ELT) Initiative is based
on the notion that providing teachers with more time to
teach and plan, and giving
students additional exposure to academic enrichment and extracurricular activities, will increase
student achievement and teacher effectiveness.
This report reviews 16 studies conducted in seven states; 103 of 112 comparisons show positive results in writing
achievement favoring
students in classrooms of NWP participants, based
on grading by «blind» coders who did not know whether the author received NWP
teaching.
Even so, despite the urgings of the caucus and the local chapters of E4E and
Teach Plus, UTLA refused to endorse the Los Angeles district's application for a $ 40 million Race to the Top grant, because it required the adoption of a teacher - evaluation system based in part
on student achievement.
But it's also increasingly clear that the new generation of teacher evaluations have the potential to strengthen instruction, make
teaching more attractive work, and raise
student achievement on a wide scale — if states and school districts stay the course
on reform.
At the conference, McKinley will be sharing examples of recent research exploring Indigenous
student engagement and
achievement in STEM disciplines, and studies
on culturally responsive
teaching practices.
At the root of outcomes - based education is the desire to raise
student achievement and prompt the nation's schools to fix their sights
on what children learn rather than
on what administrators supply and what teachers
teach.
The
achievement gains based
on that measure were more reliable measures of a teacher's practice (less variable across different classes
taught by the same teacher) and were more closely related to other measures, such as classroom observations and
student surveys.
Alonso served as CEO of Baltimore City Public Schools (City Schools) for six years, where he led a reform effort marked by a rebalancing of authority and responsibility among stakeholders, the building of a coalition in support of City Schools, leading edge labor contracts, and a focus
on individual
students and
teaching and learning that yielded marked improvement in
achievement and climate data across all levels, the first increases in enrollment in 40 years, and widespread political and ground root support for what have been divisive reform strategies in other districts.
Note, however, that we did not construct the indices based
on any hypotheses of our own about which aspects of
teaching practice measured by TES were most likely to influence
student achievement.
This means that Match Education's business model depends
on Match Education's ability to produces rookie teachers that can effectively produce
student achievement results in the schools to which they go
on to
teach.
Still, its detractors argue that the law has had unfortunate side effects: too much time spent
teaching to narrow tests, schools focused
on boosting the scores of
students who are just below the proficiency threshold, and some states lowering their standards to reduce the number of schools missing their
achievement targets.
Their study of
teaching styles finds that «
teaching style matters for
student achievement, but in the opposite direction than anticipated by conventional wisdom: an emphasis
on lecture - style presentations (rather than problem - solving activities) is associated with an increase — not a decrease — in
student achievement.»
Management expert William G. Ouchi wants to let educators in
on a secret: The key to improving
student achievement is lightening
teaching loads.
Last month, Education Next published a study that I conducted with Amelie Wupperman that looked at the impact
on student achievement of
teaching time devoted to lecturing vs. problem - solving activities.
As an example of the limitation of this measure, note that the United States is coded as a country where teacher salaries can be adjusted for outstanding performance in
teaching on the grounds that salary adjustments are possible for achieving the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards certification or for increases in student achievement test
teaching on the grounds that salary adjustments are possible for achieving the National Board for Professional
Teaching Standards certification or for increases in student achievement test
Teaching Standards certification or for increases in
student achievement test scores.
In his study, Hanushek calculated the economic value related to effective
teaching by drawing
on a research literature that provides precise estimates of the impact of
students»
achievement levels
on their lifetime earnings, and by combining these figures with estimated impacts of more - effective teachers
on student achievement.
We should expect, then, that giving schools the power to set their own budgets, performance goals, and standards of what to
teach will have an adverse impact
on student achievement.
Here, we outline a workable, balanced strategy that builds
on what has been learned in the last decade, improves
teaching, and thereby improves
student achievement.»
The highest - performing charters are those that that have most fully embraced a «no excuses» approach to
teaching and learning; have created strong school cultures based
on explicit expectations for both academic
achievement and behavior; have an intensive focus
on literacy and numeracy as the first foundation for academic
achievement; feature a relatively heavy reliance
on direct instruction and differentiated grouping, especially in the early grades; and are increasingly focused
on comprehensive
student assessment systems.
Today, graduates from programs in Brain - Based
Teaching based
on the curriculum Wilson and Conyers co-developed are supporting
student achievement in 47 U.S. states, Canada, Japan, South Korea, China, the United Arab Emirates, Bermuda, Malaysia, Vietnam, Guam, France, and Germany.
We should explicitly, rather than implicitly, value and reward our expert teachers, and we should do so regularly, not just
on Open Day, as effective
teaching is the best route to improved
student achievement and greater economic prosperity.
If we really want to improve
student achievement we need to focus
on the person who gently closes the classroom door and performs the
teaching act — the teacher — but to do that, says Russell Boyle, we need to open those classroom doors.
The development of global values can be achieved by drawing
on the well - established knowledge base in human rights education, to discern how they are upheld, and by
teaching students to value these rights and to act toward the
achievement of these rights.
Concerns over our educational system, fueled by our
students» poor performance in international comparisons of
achievement, have reinvigorated the call for early academic instruction as a remedy for inadequate
teaching later
on.
We expected to find that many of the lessons
on managing for results would be spent
teaching principals to leverage accountability systems to help improve instruction and drive
student achievement.
If we really want to improve
student achievement we need to focus
on the person who closes the classroom door and performs the
teaching act — the teacher - but to do that we need to open classroom doors.
This relationship suggests that Cincinnati's evaluation program provides feedback
on teaching skills that are associated with larger gains in
student achievement.
But we can calculate more prosaic economic values related to effective
teaching, by drawing
on a research literature that provides surprisingly precise estimates of the impact of
student achievement levels
on their lifetime earnings and by combining this with estimated impacts of more - effective teachers
on student achievement.
At the same time, the cost - effectiveness of the board's approach, its focus
on what teachers should know and be able to do rather than
on the
student outcomes or
achievement associated with
teaching, and its methods of assessing teacher quality, are features that have attracted strong criticism — issues we will return to later in this article.
Nevertheless, critics continue to question the NBPTS's method and focus for measuring quality
teaching and to call instead for what they believe should be simple and direct measures of effects
on student achievement.
The purpose of diagnosing where
students are in their learning before
teaching commences is to ensure that learning opportunities are well targeted
on individuals» current levels of
achievement and readiness.
At the same time, serious questions remain about the effects of NBCTs
on student achievement and about the cost - effectiveness of the NBPTS's approach to improving the standard of
teaching.
Employing information
on in - class time use provided by a nationally representative sample of U.S. teachers in the 2003 Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS), we estimate the impact of
teaching practices
on student achievement by looking at the differential effects
on the same
student of two different teachers, using two different
teaching strategies.
New research
on technology's effectiveness in
teaching math appears to confirm what many educators have optimistically suspected: Computers can raise
student achievement and even improve a school's climate.
Utilizing data from the Measures for Effective
Teaching project, we propose to test the impacts of ability grouping on observed teaching practice and student achievemen
Teaching project, we propose to test the impacts of ability grouping
on observed
teaching practice and student achievemen
teaching practice and
student achievement gains.
We find that
teaching style matters for
student achievement, but in the opposite direction than anticipated by conventional wisdom: an emphasis
on lecture - style presentations (rather than problem - solving activities) is associated with an increase — not a decrease — in
student achievement.