Sentences with phrase «teaching reading as»

What happens if we neglect teaching reading as a life - long skill as opposed to simply consuming information presented in a digital format?

I appreciated the acknowledgement of the complexity of teaching reading as well as the simplicity of the advice being broken down into three foundational competencies - word work, fluency and comprehension.

I began to see teaching reading as a systematic, intellectually stimulating pursuit, rather than a simply idealistic one.

Another example: Standard 2 on «Early Reading» assesses whether «The program trains teacher candidates to teach reading as prescribed by the Common Core State Standards.»

Yet most U.S. schools teach reading as if both decoding and comprehension are transferable skills.

For decades, most elementary schools have taught reading as a skill: children have practiced reading comprehension strategies like «finding the main idea» or «making inferences» on simple stories.

The National Council on Teacher Quality, with support and praise from the Fordham Institute, are grading teacher training programs on whether «The program trains teacher candidates to teach reading as prescribed by the Common Core State Standards.»

When not teaching he reads as many comics as he can, both current and classic.

Not exact matches

Read faster and retain more: Train your eye to read groups of words rather than sounding out individual words in your head, known as sub-vocalizing, says Beth Moreno, a University of Texas prof who teaches speed - reading courRead faster and retain more: Train your eye to read groups of words rather than sounding out individual words in your head, known as sub-vocalizing, says Beth Moreno, a University of Texas prof who teaches speed - reading courread groups of words rather than sounding out individual words in your head, known as sub-vocalizing, says Beth Moreno, a University of Texas prof who teaches speed - reading courses.

Musk has also mentioned The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy as one of his favorite reads, claiming it taught him that «the question is harder than the answer.

In August of 2011, I started my blog with the aim of teaching people how to save money as well as journaling my personal finance journey after reading a magazine that featured a personal finance website in one of their articles.

The Pharisees were the group who taught that the letter of the law kills, and thus were seen as merciful and kind (Josephus), versus the Sadducees who didn't believe in the «oral teachings» and thus read the Tanach very literally and applied it literally.

If you think the bible is enough, just look at the hundreds of traditional - Christian churches that read from one bible, yet teach hundreds of different doctrines, which confuses us as to which interpretation is the truth.

I never as - sume anyone has as many books as I have, because I have been collecting books and reading since my sisters taught me to read when I was five.

The mythical friend Gabriel was the mythical friend of Jesus the Messaih accompanying him all time as per the Quran readings... this mythical friend is the right hand for God and was sent to nearly all messengers of God to deliver teachings from God to his messengers and Gabriel is the only Angel that has minimum number of wings reaching the sixth heaven as a limit... as per my readings and narrow knowledge... Reality you are playin with fire here show respect even if you are agnostic about all as you are only human and do not know the unknown of see the unseen or touch the untouched or feel the unfelt because even when you are alone you are not alone.

When I would teach / preach on «tithing» as a New Testament practice, I would ask the listener (read: giver - to - be) the following question: «If in the New Testament we find no reference to «tithing» let alone a stated percentage to give to the «church», and if it is our understanding (perhaps even our practice!)

I know ignorance makes people say stupid things but as many problems it has a solution: reading and learning!!!! Muslims will never say anything bad about the Holy Books or about the prophets because all of them are part of Islam and it's teachings.

Throughout my life as a christian, i was never taught or read to hate or harm another human.

And it perhaps suggests that Christians are reading their Bibles for themselves and are not afraid to challenge what they regard as false teaching.

If, as the Church had always taught, the Bible contained God's revelation to man, every man (they urged) ought to be able to read it for himself, and not to be dependent upon what might reach him by indirect channels.

What is less clear to me is why complementarians like Keller insist that that 1 Timothy 2:12 is a part of biblical womanhood, but Acts 2 is not; why the presence of twelve male disciples implies restrictions on female leadership, but the presence of the apostle Junia is inconsequential; why the Greco - Roman household codes represent God's ideal familial structure for husbands and wives, but not for slaves and masters; why the apostle Paul's instructions to Timothy about Ephesian women teaching in the church are universally applicable, but his instructions to Corinthian women regarding head coverings are culturally conditioned (even though Paul uses the same line of argumentation — appealing the creation narrative — to support both); why the poetry of Proverbs 31 is often applied prescriptively and other poetry is not; why Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob represent the supremecy of male leadership while Deborah and Huldah and Miriam are mere exceptions to the rule; why «wives submit to your husbands» carries more weight than «submit one to another»; why the laws of the Old Testament are treated as irrelevant in one moment, but important enough to display in public courthouses and schools the next; why a feminist reading of the text represents a capitulation to culture but a reading that turns an ancient Near Eastern text into an apologetic for the post-Industrial Revolution nuclear family is not; why the curse of Genesis 3 has the final word on gender relationships rather than the new creation that began at the resurrection.

My training, academically speaking, is in logic and rhetoric, and having taught first year college students I tend to read everything as though I'm grading.

These teachings can be read as being about divine love and salvation, sure.

I'm looking to eventually teach theology, but in between my personal studies, an obsessive reading habit, and spending far too much money on coffee, I started a blog called New Ways Forward as an outlet for some of my random thoughts and a way to interact with others who share a passion for theology, Biblical studies, and social justice.

Wright criticizes Reformers for failing to stress «the great narrative of God, Israel, Jesus, and the world, coming forward into our own day and looking ahead to the eventual renewal of all things» so that their readings of the gospels «show little awareness of them as anything other than repositories of dominical teaching, concluding with the saving events of Good Friday and Easter but without integrating those events into the Kingdom - proclamation that preceded them.»

For us, to serve Christ is just as much to feed the hungry, to teach people to read, and to help them in their struggle for justice, as it is to baptize them.»

The teachings were put into memorable «tales» as you call them because most people didn't read thousands of years ago — they were teaching tools and they were never intended to be examined literally.

Wonderful teacher... get out your Bible and start reading... this guy is a wolf in sheep's clothing leading millions to an eternity in hell... the prosperity gospel he teaches is contrary to the teachings of Christ... Christ talked about abundance in life but he was speaking of spiritual abundance not material things... Scripture and Christ said in this life you will have trouble... Christ suffered in this life as did each of his Apostles... open your eyes before it is too late for you.

But as I've been reading the Sermon on the Mount and the teachings of Jesus, I'm beginning to realize that following these revolutionary teachings would result in a different sort of salvation — salvation from myself.

I finished reading The Shape of Sola Scriptura last week, and with his emphasis on creeds and the teaching office of the church, it made me ask a few related questions as the one above.

As for myself, I believe the Bible is 100 % accurate and true, but (if you have read my blog or listened to my podcast for a while), I have a somewhat different approach to this belief than is commonly taught.

But every now and then, as I'm reading through the Gospels and examining the life and teaching of Jesus, I realize how often I rely on my nice, Southern charm to serve as a sort of watered - down version of Christlikeness.

Reading literature teaches them stories they can use as it also teaches them to see stories in everyday life.

Of course, as you say, being the church is about so much more than just reading, teaching, or singing songs.

Anyone who has even studied the Bible in a cursory manner can see that Christ came to «fulfill, not abolish» (Mt. 5:17), and Christ taught about a variety of things his followers should do; otherwise, the Gospels would have simply read «The Torah is obsolete; go now, and live as you please.»

As she continues to read, we hear about Paul's incarceration and persecution, about how Jesus is «the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation,» about watching out for all those false teachings that circulated through the trade routes, about how we ought to stop judging each other over differences of opinion regarding religious festivals and food (I blush a little at this point and resolved to make peace with some rather opinionated friends before the next sacred meal), about how we should clothe ourselves with compassion, kindness, humility, gentleness, and patience, and love, about how we must forgive one another, about how the things that once separated Jew from Greek and slave from free are broken down at the foot of the cross, about how we should sing more hymns.

And Jesus replied: «Yes, James, when you read the Scriptures look for those eternally true and divinely beautiful teachings, such as:

According to the Barna study, the percent of engagement people have with the Bible — from being engaged (reading the Bible at least four times a week), friendly (engaged with the Bible less than four times a week), neutral (read the Bible once a month or less and see the Bible as the inspired word of God, but acknowledge it can have some errors) and skeptical (see the Bible as «just another book of teachings written by men)-- has started to stabilize and return to its normal rates after the rate of skepticism increased by 4 percent to 14 percent and the rate of friendliness dropped 8 percent to 37 percent in 2011.

«Until we know the power of divine grace, we read in the Bible concerning eternal punishment, and we think it is too heavy and too hard, and we are apt to kick against it, and find out some heretic or other who teaches us another doctrine; but when the soul is really quickened by divine grace, and made to feel the weight of sin, it thinks the bottomless pit none too deep, and the punishment of hell none too severe for sin such as it has committed.

Every image has at least one minister (some more than one, as in teaching); but he is never alone if we read beyond the cartoon itself.

Smith didn't like religion taught so he went in the woods as an angle gave him this Golden Plate Bible that only he could read.

It is almost as if evolutionists read Genesis and decided that to turn people from their faith they would teach that the exact opposite is true.

I read a comment that the person said Islam teaches «convert or be killed», which I find odd as I have been married to a muslim for 6 years now and neither her or her family have taken me out yet.

Michael Zuckert, as I've also said before, surely teaches more truth about Locke than anyone else by reading the account of personal identity in the ECHU into THE SECOND TREATISE and elsewhere.

In preparing to teach a course, I looked through a folder of accumulated notes and realized that I first taught the course to an adult class consisting of three women: Jennifer, a widow of about 60 years of age with an eighth - grade schooling, whose primary occupations were keeping a brood of chickens and a goat and watching the soaps on television; Penny, 55, an army wife who treated her retired military husband and her teenage son and daughter as items of furniture in her antiseptic house, dusting them off and placing them in positions that would show them off to her best advantage, and then getting upset when they didn't stay where she put them — she was, as you can imagine, in a perpetual state of upset; and Brenda, married, mother of two teenage sons, a timid, shy, introverted hypochondriac who read her frequently updated diagnoses and prescriptions from about a dozen doctors as horoscopes — the scriptures by which she lived.

The idea that Catholic just war teaching begins with a «presumption against war,» more recently phrased as «a strong presumption against the use of force,» first appears in the United States bishops» widely read 1983 pastoral letter, The Challenge of Peace.

He read what Whitehead had written as physicist and said to himself and others, «This man should be teaching philosophy.»

Because the your whims come of, to me, as harsh and hate filled and comment of the supposed Christians that preach hate in miss direction, oh ya that is what Jesus taught Read the Bible!

His teaching method, as I remember it, was simply to engage in reflective close readings of the Shakespeare tragedies and comedies, delineating their rich texture of image and metaphor and opening up their complex central themes — moral, philosophical and religious.

Read loses sight of Buber's concept of dialogue, however, when he suggests that Buber's teaching shows how to replace the inter-individual tensions of the classroom by «an organic mode of adaptation to the social organism as a whole» and when he reinterprets the teacher's concentration of an effective world as a selective screen in which what is kept in and what is left out is determined by the organic social pattern through the medium of the teacher's «sense of a total organism's feeling - behaviour.»