I was in a conversation with someone the other day who said he wondered if perhaps LGBT Christians have a special role to play in
teaching the Church how to engage thoughtfully around issues about sexuality.
She has been called to
teach the Church how to get to the mountain top of spiritual maturity as the Church waits for heaven.
Not exact matches
When Piers Morgan asks
how much Kim is worth, she says, «Whatever it is, I give 10 % away to the
church and that's what I was
taught.
Several moments later, someone asked
how many of the
churches have senior or
teaching pastors spend 1 - 2 minutes at the offering time in the service challenging the
church to give.
How do atheists explain the obvious benefit, both economically, educationally, socially, and spiritually, that America receives when its people are walking with God, ministering through
church and missions, and creating and basing laws and moral conduct on Biblical
teachings?
It assembles every four years and determines ¯ after deliberating and voting ¯ what The United Methodist
Church is to teach and practice, and how the church is to order its life, during the next quadre
Church is to
teach and practice, and
how the
church is to order its life, during the next quadre
church is to order its life, during the next quadrennium.
If only he had, in addition to taking a deep breath and counting to ten, considered
how embarrassingly transparent his support for same - sex marriage and opposition to the
Church's
teaching would appear to any thoughtful reader.
And
how does Christ's
Church apply this
teaching authoritatively today?
Funny
how they don't
teach that stuff in
church huh?
How can the
church build an entire system around accountability if it isn't expressly
taught in Scripture?
Opponents of Catholic moral
teaching, whether inside or outside the
Church, seldom give actual arguments; more often, they demonize the «harsh,» «obsessive,» «judgmental» Catholic who emphasizes dogma and wants to tell others
how to live their lives.
The work that Betel asks people to take part in, aside from
teaching new skills and helping people to learn
how to live in a routine, also partly funds the addicts» own recovery — the rest comes from
church donations.
The hypocrisy is
how these supposedly Catholic universities handle guests who do not support
Church teaching.
Maybe it's a good idea for American Christians to take a sabbatical from traditional
church for a few years and focus on
how how each individual relates to the
teachings and example of Jesus outdisde the influence of ecclesiastical thought control.
Paul is not providing a prescription for
how all
teaching in all
churches must be conducted.
Probably not, unless the
church teaches you
how to meditate deeply and you have a direct personal experience of God.
Seems quite one sided - no presentation of what the Catholic
Teaching is and
how these nuns have vowed to follow
Church teachings.
Jesus
teaches us
how to resolve conflict in a
church community.
It wasn't easy, back at the last «
church», we were
taught some stuff,
how to defend our man of God against critics, we were warned if we walk away of the spiritual covering (the man of God) we would die.
To the contrary, when it is recognized that in Paul's surviving letters to the Corinthians, he nowhere addresses elders, this section is best seen as a description of
how a
church could get it's
teaching when there are no trained and qualified elders to perform the
teaching.
None of these folks were
taught in seminary
how to handle
church bullies.
However,
how does corporate worship (which is encouraged in Hebrews 10:19 - 25 among other places) and meeting and
teaching take place if not in «the
church»?
Here are some specifics on
how this «always worship together rule» has now infiltrated our lives: Fred occasionally
teaches Sunday School at my Baptist
Church; I fully participation in his faith community's services and rituals during Hindu festival weekends.
How then do we present the
Church's
teaching to the modern world in its orthodox meaning, yet without introducing any sense of arbitrariness or incoherence into God's works, which is what the thinkers named above were all rightly keen to avoid?
«The most important book published by the Holy See in this generation for Catholic education,» says Bishop O'Donoghue, «is theCatechism of the Catholic
Church, and its summary, the Compendium of the Catechism of the Catholic
Church»; he says that «it is vital that both the Catechismand the Compendiumare used by teachers in our schools and colleges, who can guide pupils in
how to make best use of them»; that «the key to unlocking this treasury of
Church teaching....
For the faithful in Christ can not accept this view, which holds either that after Adam there existed men on this earth who did not receive their origin by natural generation from him, the first parent of all, or that Adam signifies some kind of multiple first parents; for it is by no means apparent
how such an opinion can be reconciled with what the sources of revealed truth and the acts of the magisterium of the
Church teach about original sin, which proceeds from a sin truly committed by one Adam, and which is transmitted to all by generation, and exists in each one as his own» -LCB- Humani Generis 37).
How many mothers like Erik's, in the time of the early
church, became models of the great high priest, whose solidarity with us in all things human inspired bold witness and
teaching of the paschal mystery?
Three decades of studying the Bible, the
church and
church history has shown me
how far we've strayed from what Jesus
taught.
Sit down and read just the red letters... you can just read the red letters in Matthew... and then compare and see just
how much the present day
church adheres to the
teachings of Jesus.
In my past I went to
churches where the primary
teaching was ask Jesus to forgive your sins and that is
how to get saved.
Because there are others who believe the same way I do, and we have the best Bible scholars, and the best seminaries, and the biggest
churches, and the most authors, and our missionaries are very active overseas, and we agree with most of the
teachings of the
church throughout history... at least since the Reformation anyway... and I believe that with time, and a little education of
how to really study the Bible, people will eventually see that what I believe is the right way to believe.
Isn't it neat
how these protectors of child molesters can demand special treatment because of their
church's
teachings?
If you have a website or a blog which shows
how your
church (or a
church you know) is
teaching and training believers to be fully devoted followers of Jesus Christ, please post these links in the comments section below.
U.N. experts in Geneva were at it again last week telling the Holy See that Catholic
teaching on abortion is a human rights abuse, revealing a chasm between the
Church's understanding of its mission and
how U.N. officials perceive it.
Though they held different views of
Church government, they were quite close on their view of what was Christian truth and
how it was to be preached and
taught.
Most of the seminaries, if not all,
teach young ministers
how to conduct public worship, but the ministers less often
teach their people
how to worship when they get to
church.
The marriage relationship isn't exempt from the words of Jesus — and the
teachings of the
Church — about
how we are to interact with one another and love one another.
Of course, I might be able to find a local
church where everyone looks like me, where each aspect of the worship service is exactly
how I'd desire, and where sound
teaching is proclaimed.
How do you reconcile using Augustine as an arbiter on Christianity when you plainly abhor the
teachings of the Catholic
Church, which he helped write?
Certainly, Jesus changed some of the Kingdom expectations through His life,
teaching, and ministry, especially in the areas of what sort of Messiah King He was going to be, and
how the Kingdom of God would exist and function upon the earth, but the overall hopes and dreams of Israel, especially as presented within the Prophets, remained intact through the
teachings and ministry of John, Jesus, and the Early
Church.
Sometimes I wonder
how many women in the
church have the gift of
teaching, but will never use it, or even entertain the possibility of possessing it.
Writing on the subject of Arminianism, Piper asks, «But
how should we regard these errors in relationship to the
teaching office of the
church and other institutions?»
In particular, I have tried to understand
how this great scientist who became a close friend of Albert Einstein was also a priest, faithful to the
teachings of the Catholic
Church and deeply rooted in his spiritual and sacerdotal life.
Dr. Streett argues that the concept of the Kingdom of God is not
how it is
taught or understood in most
churches and Bible studies, namely, as equivalent to going to heaven when we die... as a pie in the sky in the bye - and - bye.
Origen of Alexandria, the first major interpreter of the Bible in the
Church's history, said that «the apostle Paul, «teacher of the Gentiles in faith and truth,»
taught the
Church...
how it ought to interpret the books of the Law.»
It raises a question that all thoughtful Christians must at some point address:
How do we identify the true tradition of Christian
teaching throughout history, and what part does the
Church play in that tradition?
Arden said she was
taught by a supervisor at the
church's nursery
how to opt out of a Texas law that requires most children to be immunized.
Wendy is the author of Practical Theology for Women:
How Knowing God Makes a Difference in Our Daily Lives, and she spent four years
teaching theology to women at Mars Hill
Church in Seattle.
That said, Cardinal Kasper has done the
Church a service because the observation that there is an «abyss» between what the
Church teaches and
how so many of her children actually live is demonstrably true.
Most
churches can and will show you
how to serve
church, but they are not very focused on
teaching you
how to serve Christ.