Many people have been
taught the theory of evolution as the method by which we got the world as we now see it.
It has been close to two hundred years that we have been
teaching the theory of evolution in our universities, yet still almost 50 % of America don't believe in it or believe God is involved.
You can try and
teach me the theory of creationism... oh wait it does not quality as a theory.
You can try and
teach me the THEORY of evolution in school, but I have the right to walk out and be taught something else.
Well then you might as well
teach the theories of the creation in the Kuran, the Buddhist ideas, and heck why not throw in the Incans and Mayans as well.
Gardner cautions that when religious superstition should be on the wane, it is easy «to forget that thousands of high school teachers of biology, in many of our southern states, are still afraid to
teach the theory of evolution for fear of losing their jobs.»
«The biggest problem is that there are only 5 — 10 evolutionary scientists in the country who
teach the theory of evolution in undergraduate and graduate schools,» he says.
In 1925 a Tennessee teacher of biology named Thomas Scopes was tried for
teaching the theory of evolution.
The Louisiana Supreme Court last week upheld the right of the state legislature to require schools to
teach the theory of «creation science» along with «evolution science.»
It teaches you the theory of diving — physics, physiology, decompression theory, equipment, skills and environment, as well as skills circuits, mapping, assisting, teaching, general day to day running's of a dive shop, paperwork, signing in guests, selling equipment etc etc!
It teaches you the theory of diving — physics, physiology, decompression theory, equipment, skills and environment, as well as skills practice, mapping, assisting, teaching and the general day to day running's of a dive shop.
I'm now
teaching a Theory of Landscape Painting at The Art Guild, 200 Port Washington Blvd., Manhasset, NY.
Responsible for
teaching theories of various dance forms like contemporary, ballet and hip hop
As a graduate school Professor for over ten years, I have
taught the theories of marriage and family therapy for over ten years and facilitated the couples training program at a Community Mental Health Center as well.
But points 1 and 3 deal more specifically with one's power of observation, and thereafter, one's ability to learn from same and adjust one's behaviour accordingly, vs applying the same - old, same - old, one - size - fits - all conventionally -
taught theories of collective manipulation tactics ostensibly to be applied to differing situations / circumstances.
Not exact matches
I learned conversational Korean, studied everything from string
theory physics to ancient Greek and even
taught myself the basics
of computer programming without the internet, using textbooks.
In 1997, Moore linked the
theory of evolution to violent crime: «They're acting like animals because we've
taught them they come from animals,» Moore said.
Valdis Krebs
of Orgnet explains that «Schools are still stuck on
teaching 20th century math for building things rather than 21st century math for understanding things» and suggests that curriculums focus less on the mathematics
of engineering (e.g. algebra and calculus) and more on the mathematics
of patterns (e.g. set
theory, graph
theory, etc.).
Peoples» attention has been distracted into speculation about
of how they might get rich in a parallel universe that might exist in
theory — if one accepts the narrow - minded assumptions that are being
taught — but whose most important real - world consequence is to impose a debt spiral on America and other nations.
Loss - aversion
theory teaches us that the fear
of loss can be nearly twice as powerful as the hope
of earning a reward.
In the real world, this is simply not true» Guy Spier «A whole body
of academic work formed the foundation upon which generations
of students at the country's major business schools were
taught about Modern Portfolio
Theory, Efficient Market
Theory and Beta.
If you've been reading some
of my recent posts, you will have noted my, and the Investment Masters belief, that many
of the investment
theories taught in most business schools are flawed.
Self -
taught, his management style is based on the strict application
of the principles
of value management (Graham, Buffet, Peter Lynch, etc.), underpinned by a deep understanding
of the Austrian
theory of economic cycles.
Many
of the
theories which were
taught as scientific fact have been proved wrong.
Evolutionary
Theory is the cornerstone
of modern biology and well deserves to be
taught in every science classroom.
Evolutionary
theory deserves to be
taught in every classroom because it is the cornerstone
of modern Biology.
Of course not, but we don't
teach theories that don't have strong scientific backing.
How about
teaching different
theories on our creation beside the unproven
theory of evolution?
but not
taught as fact and right after science class where they learn Darwin's
theory of evolution, watch videos on the big bang
theory, have a field trip where they meet up with an archeologist to uncover one
of our ancestors remains that weren't as evolved, learn how old the earth truely is etc.....
Unlike Anselm's legalistic
theory of the Atonement, the writings
of the Early Church Fathers
teach theosis or deification, the realization
of our human potential for godlikeness through a relational participation in the Divine Life, as the source
of our redemption in Christ:
This fake rapture
theory goes against Jesus» truth that He returns to His favorite place on earth, that we are to endure to the end, the meek shall inherit the earth for examples
of some
of his scriptures that contradict that
teaching.
It is an important issue and if you look around, the fanatics are the ones who put their faith in
theories like evolution and they are forcing themselves on every aspect
of life and Bill said it himself, he wants your child
taught evolution and the evolutionist will fight to indoctinate every child.
Ever hear
of a University in Europe, china, Ja.pan or Australia
teach the «talking snake»
theory?
The lives
of the saints do not present us with a new
theory of virtue, but a new way
of teaching, a new strategy that builds on the tradition
of examples, but enriches it by unfolding a pattern
of holiness over the course
of a lifetime.
Science has
taught us extraordinary truths about this universe — from what composes matter (atomic physics), to the great variety and forms
of life (evolution) to medicine (germ
theory of disease).
And for the record
teaching evolution is
teaching a
theory and does not necessarily contradict the concept
of creationism.
On March 11, 2002 during a panel discussion on evolution Meyer publicly told the Ohio Board
of Education that the «Santorum Amendment» was part
of the Education Bill, and therefore that the State
of Ohio was required to
teach alternative
theories to evolution as part
of its biology curriculum.
Popular acceptance
of the
theory comes largely from C.I. Scofield, who
taught the view in the footnotes
of his Scofield Reference Bible.
Since no one has yet to SEE an atom, the idea
of the structure
of the atom can only be inferred by experimental evidence — yet I see no Republican trying to stop
teaching the structure
of the atom in school — oh that's right, its because major corporations and industries rely on this science (pharm, weapons manufacturers etc etc) whereas the
theory of evolution is merely think piece
of scientists on how life on Earth changes over time.
The
theory is not uncontroversial even among Muslims, many
of whom believe that
teaching anything other than the «substitution» model is tantamount to heresy.
hey G, I am acquainted with your
theory there... it is called Preterism... it is the standard interpretation
of Revelation given by liberals... I walked away from that belief and the church I was raised in when I found out what they are
teaching... Nope, the book
of revelation is not a «code» for the events
of the day at the time
of the fall
of Jerusalem.
Or Russell Hittinger's path - breaking «Two Thomisms, Two Modernities»: «The past century and a half
of papal
teaching on modern times often seems a tangle: any number
of different strands — theology, Thomistic philosophy, social
theory, economics — all snarled together.
The view
of the atonement that you have been
taught (Penal Substitution) is one
of four or five major
theories on the atonement.
The biblical
teaching, after all, was not aimed at one or another
of the various
theories developed in the history
of modern science but at the cosmological understandings
of origins found among surrounding peoples.
«The creation story is
taught in science and there is no evidence that pupils learn scientific
theories about the origin
of the Earth.»
By saying there is no room for «personal salvation» in your understanding
of Jesus»
teaching and then claiming that personal salvation gets us to the topic
of atonement
theory — what was it that you were wanting to say if not making a link between atonement
theory and salvation?
The past century and a half
of papal
teaching on modern times often seems a tangle: any number
of different strands — theology, Thomistic philosophy, social
theory, economics — all snarled together.
Most
of the 350 - plus books written by «creation scientists» consist in large part
of discussions
of the supposed errors
of evolutionary
teaching, reviewing vast amounts
of technical scientific data and
theory, challenging this or that piece
of evidence, method
of dating or use
of data, while producing evidences and counterarguments
of their own in favor
of a young earth, recent humanity, worldwide flood, etc..
I was in my early twenties when I first encountered a fossil record that didn't match what I'd been
taught in Sunday school about the «myth»
of evolutionary
theory.
If, as some persons maintain, Christianity was a total transformation
of the message
of Jesus — a doctrine about Jesus rather than Jesus» own
teaching — then it is
of paramount importance to see how and why this transformation took place, or rather, first
of all, whether the
theory of transformation is true.