No question brady and their staff can do some great things but it should be highlighted that this eagles
team on BOTH sides of the ball and coaching aren't close to any of those they faced in their afc journey.
Not exact matches
The
team went
on an eight - game winning streak, and has been pretty impressive
on both
sides of the
ball.
With the duo linking up brilliantly, star Lions receiver Calvin Johnson knows that his
team have to find a way
of limiting them while he will look to do the damage
on the other
side of the
ball.
The defensive
side of the
ball isn't pretty for either
team, as the Giants have placed LB B.J. Goodson (ankle, out) and S Landon Collins (forearm, out)
on IR, while the Redskins will be without DT Ziggy Hood (elbow, out), LB Zach Brown (foot, out), and LB Ryan Anderson (knee, out).
They had the Undefeated # 1
Team Guggenheim
on the ropes going into the second half but they just couldn't close out the W. Jack Murphy hit Marty Finnegan for two Touchdowns for the Offensive
side of the
ball.
A few key contributors really struggled
on the offensive
side of the
ball as their leading scorer and the leagues second leading scorer, Sterling Williams, was only able to muster 12 points against a very stingy
Team Harlander D. Michael Halusek was able to put up 17 points while Chris Hicks chipped in with 10, unfortunately that just wasn't enough to get them past a very determined
Team Harlander.
Metrics overview: These
teams are almost identical
on both
sides of the
ball.
Two Stars, Joe Montana and Jerry Rice, were at the top
of their games; two
teams were playing for the NFC championship, but all the big plays were
on one
side of the
ball.
Teams with elite seeds are expected to play elite
ball on both
sides of the court.
To be fair to the Arsenal and Germany international star, I can appreciate that a lot
of his game is focused
on the creative
side of the game; using his passing, movement and vision to make the
team flow and stretch the opposition before spotting the killer
ball that will unlock the defence.
I picked Michigan because I think while both
teams have strong defenses, the Wolverines have the advantage
on the offensive
side of the
ball.
We lost against Watford we expect to win against Chelsea are we serious???? I dreamed we lost 4 1 I could not watch the match after we let the second in that nightmare was
on I thought >> >> > as for that first goal it should not have stood as the goal came from dangerous play >> >> > unfortunately the
team fell apart the unity has gone out the window >> >> players make school errors yet they earn 100 000 a week crazy carry
on >> >> > I am sick
of it I have had it with this punch >> > embarrassing carry
on cant defend cant attack they only thing they can do is dwell with the
ball side ways I am sick
of this dwelling about with the
ball
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety
of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style
of play has become a shadow
of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out
of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the
ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through
balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid
of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago...
on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender
on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out
of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive
on the
ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes
of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play
of Monreal, but none
of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio
of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right
side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national
team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the
ball too long, gives the
ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities
on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long
ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part
of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role
on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part
of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature
of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third...
on the front end, we have Ozil, a player
of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out
of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front
of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National
team's midfield, where
teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily
on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are
on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that,
of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one
of those 3 players to stay
on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one
of the most committed skill players we've seen
on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already
of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs
of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the
ball too long and he will give the
ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this
team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack
of mobility is an albatross around the necks
of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because
of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this
side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this
team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
The only rule is that the players with the same number can't be
on the field at the same time, which usually means that
teams have a player
on the offensive and defensive
side of the
ball with the same.
I still don't understand people's obsession with boxing players in to a specific role... The whole «true DM» is a dying breed, even Coquelin is arguably something else considering the advanced positions he takes up often in front
of Santi and takes major risks in winning the
ball back for us... IMO, the reason Coquelin has had such a successful integration into the first
team is that he focussed incredibly hard
on the basics
of his role first and foremost before adding other elements to his game (long -
balls, driving runs into space, more aggressive
ball movement in general) it's not rocket science to tell a player to curb the attacking
side of their game and focus primarily
on defence before attack... Nor is it that hard to see that playing in a midfield pairing with either Ramsey or Cazorla is going to be different as well.
Two recurring items that were discussed
on the Cats
side of the
ball were that Duke had run roughshod over the defense and that Jackson has had no success agaist Power 5
teams; none
of the observations
on the two topics took into account the defensive back injuries that depleted the defense for Duke or the fact that Jackson has been banged up.
I was ten when watching the great Tottenham
side of 1960 - 61 and new without doubt they were the best
team I'd ever seen, (apart from the great Real Madrid
of 1960 -RCB- the way they slid the
ball around keeping
on the floor and didn't need a grown up to tell me, They were skating the league that year like Manchester City are now and I can still remember sitting
on the corner
of a crash barrier at the back
of the North Bank (It's the only way I could see) when they beat 3 - 2 at Highbury
on a hot September day.
At present, sticking our natural 10
on the touchline and confining him to one
side of the field, and then playing with Xhaka and El - Neny in the middle who both prefer to go sideways / backwards (with the occasional
ball over the top from Xhaka) does not maximize the best attributes
of the
team in my opinion.
I agree with you that AW has done some astounding things for the club, but he has also made some reall
balls ups and week in week out it seems he is not able to offer up a tactical plan B or utilise key players in key positions against the relevant
sides we play, (not starting with Rosicky and Walcott
on Saturday was one such instance) I realise that no
team wins all their games and I know that we have been under the cosh for quiet a few years now, but what annoys me more than anything else is the lack
of Visible ambition, we spent three weeks messing around with Beliek and only just managed to get Paulista who was an uncertainty due to a work visa.
I fully understand we just lost one game and uts not the end
of the world but am struggling to deal with is the consistent lack
of mental toughness that are the hallmarks
of all title winning
teams... we need to be proactive and stop been reactionary, simples... we had what is in all honesty a good couple
of matches begining
of the season WINNABLE games but we already fell short at the first hurdle now all the talk is about bouncing back, whatever happened to eyes
on the
ball straight from the off... a Westham
side with a new manager, some new players and a 16 year old making his debut beating Arsenal at home is just plain disgraceful and whatever happens next does not in any way mitigate against that.....
Don't have much info and knowledge like you people here, but there were few things that I did realise yesterday, lack
of presence
of mind, one instance which I could recall was when, Ramsey had a chance to pass it to fellow mates and instead he went for the glory and finished
on the
side net...... secondly we might say Fabianski made it tough for us...... well when you have a clear chance to score a goal, how can you hit a
ball straight to a keeper from 15 yards...... I like Ozil but when an opponent
team parks a bus, he becomes less
of a player he is.......
Yes we have improved we have become more aware we have started to show some maturity when facing the top dogs and that's the difference between us this season and us getting SMASHED by all
of the top
teams last season and if you watch football you can see that the city
side are not a patch
on their former selves nor Liverpool nor even chelski, we are NOT another 49 unbeaten squad not yet and not for a while until the improvements are made, Yea credit where its due
of course but lets NOT RUN AWAY WITH THE IDEA WE ARE WORLD BEATERS JUST YET EH, AKB's are the reason we'll never improve as a fan base because they can see NO wrong in anything the board or AW does, Im no AOB but I do see the need for self criticism and improvement and at BIGGUN its not a ridiculous statement at all we have improved but they have also been off the
ball and that why we're having a good run.
We now have the worst coach in football being embolden to play a selfish and embarrassing brand
of football to protect his legacy all because the best coach
on the
team has his
side of the
ball playing at an elite level.
Nothing like one underachiever blowing smoke up the ass
of another... we know that Ozil has some incredible technical gifts, but to be considered the best you have to bring more than just assists to the table... for me, a top player has to possess a more well - rounded game, which doesn't mean they need to be a beast
on both ends
of the pitch, but they must have the ability to take their game to another level when it matters most... although he amassed some record - like stats early
on, it set the bar too high, so when people expected him to duplicate those numbers each year the pressure seemed to get the best
of our soft - spoken star... obviously that's not an excuse for what has happened in the meantime, but it's important to make note
of a few things: (1) his best year was a transition year for many
of the traditionally dominant
teams in the EPL, so that clearly made the numbers appear better than they actually were and (2) Wenger's system, or lack thereof, didn't do him any favours; by playing him out
of position and by not acquiring world - class striker and / or right -
side forward that would best fit an Ozil - centered offensive scheme certainly hurt his chances to repeat his earlier peformances, (3) the loss
of Cazorla, who took a lot
of pressure off Ozil in the midfield and was highly efficient when it came to getting him the
ball in space, negatively impacted his effectiveness and (4) he likewise missed a good chunk
of games and frankly never looked himself when he eventually returned to the field... overall the Ozil experiment has had mixed reviews and rightfully so, but I do have some empathy for the man because he has always carried himself the same way, whether for Real or the German National
team, yet he has only suffered any lengthy down periods with Arsenal... to me that goes directly to this club's inability to surround him with the necessary players to succeed, especially for someone who is a pass first type
of player; as such, this simply highlights our club's ineffective and antiquated transfer policies... frankly I'm disappointed in both Ozil and our management
team for not stepping up when it counted because they had a chance to do something special, but they didn't have it in them... there is no one that better exemplifies our recent history than Ozil, brief moments
of greatness undercut by long periods
of disappointing play, only made worse by his mopey posturing like a younger slightly less awkward Wenger... what a terribly waste
5) Clarkson is actually looking pretty good
on both
sides of the
ball, and is the one player
on this
team outside
of LeBron who is not afraid to attack the rim.
Walcott though limited would be very confident against Man united Cech (No word he has shocked me, Wow this guy is too great for a
team with wenger as coach) Bellerin (He really has to improve his attacking
side nd try to take
on defenders) Chambers (Hez really good against de big guns & always gud in de middle
of de park) Kos (Hez been a bit de-moltivated due to wengers lack
of ambition hope Man u will do) Mon (link - up with walcott
on the left would be breath
of fresh air) Coq (great tackler, stamina & power) Ramsey (great passer
of de
ball, professional & great stamina) Sanchez (
on the right, so he won't always play predictably) Walcott (thats where he was effective the last time against man u) Welbeck (Pace, goals & trickery) Giroud (Power, bully, link - up & goals) 4 -4-2 formation
It was clear from Day 1 that David Beaty's first
team in Lawrence would have little
on either
side of the
ball, especially offense.
If we get stronger play from the lines
on both
sides of the
ball, we are a much better
team by virtue
of that fact alone.
Penn State has a lot
of big targets
on the outside, but where they really killed
teams was in McSorley's ability to throw the
ball to the back shoulder
on go routes to either
side of the field.
After all, the
team lost a number
of key players
on both
sides of the
ball including, first round draft picks RB Trent Richardson, S Mark Barron, CB Dre Kirkpatrick and LB Do nt» a Hightower.
His lack
of urgency and ability
on the
ball also leads to a slow and obvious build up from the back that often lets
teams reassemble even when the aim is to shift them
side to
side.
I think City were good, in fact I think City are the best Premier League
side since the Invincibles, the movement
of the players, the way they keep the
ball on the floor and the way close
teams down, all signs
of Pep genius, I fancy them for the Champions League, and to think Pep took a years sabbatical to give Wenger time to leave and replace him.
Loic Perrin has been a leader
of Saint - Etiennes
team for the last 4 seasons hes a LEADER
on the pitch Versatile and hes tough as any ive seen him man handle Ibrahimovic and hes not just a blast the
ball clear type
of player he always looks for the pass and prolific in the air he would bring something to Arsenal that we need, Do nt talk about what league players are from Koscielny actually came from Ligue2 and hes a Boss, Alexis came from barcalona and hes little pitbull two player
on the opposite
sides of Ex-Club levels so you cant talk about what league they are from to judge
on ability.
What the metrics say: Wisconsin is an elite third - down
team, ranking in the top 12 in conversion percentage
on both
sides of the
ball.
UNLV's new center should improve the Rebels
on both
sides of the
ball as the
team attempts to climb out
of the Mountain West cellar.
Dirkin matched up very well with
Team Dean in this one, but when all was said and done,
Team Dean was too much to handle
on the defensive
side of the
ball.
We can c the
team make necessary adjustments
on both
sides of the
ball..
However, the
team will need to get back to the drawing board to shore up a few things
on the defensive
side of the
ball if they plan
on getting a few more wins before closing out the regular season.
But both
teams had a fair amount
of time
on the
ball, but there was no
side looking the slightest like being in control.
There are some concerns with this
team, particularly
on the offensive
side of the
ball.
The mixture
of great senior leadership and an influx
of talented sophomores has produced a
team that is among the region's best
on both
sides of the
ball.
The decision - making
on show by United's attackers, and their readiness to use the
ball or pass it
on to a
team mate depending
on their situation, seemed the best embodiment
of their
side's performance at Wembley: a mix
of personal endeavour and group - think football played by a
side all switched onto the same wavelength.
Of course this isn't the same for all
teams — a direct
side, such as West Brom in England, or Eibar in Spain, is more reliant
on what happens after the initial long
ball.
He contributed well
on the other
side of the
ball, making three tackles and a
team - high five interceptions.
On the defensive
side of things, the
teams who see less
of the
ball, and therefore have more defending to do, tend to dominate the numbers.
It is apparent that his skill set calls more for a four man defense, but he was still able to aid the
team both
on the defensive
side of the
ball and the offensive.
Walcott was not
on the field period, he does not go get the
ball, does not help out the right
side of the
team, or just hug the byline and call for the
ball when and if we can switch it.
On the other side Alberto Moreno would take up a more all - encompassing left wing back position, keeping an eye on the defensive side of his role, even when the team had the bal
On the other
side Alberto Moreno would take up a more all - encompassing left wing back position, keeping an eye
on the defensive side of his role, even when the team had the bal
on the defensive
side of his role, even when the
team had the
ball.
On the other
side of the
ball, Tech allows 4.5 yards per rush to
teams normally getting 4.2 and a mere 6.4 yards per pass to 7.3.
The desire to win the
ball in his own half and go
on to create attacking opportunities for the
team show a different
side of his game that he has been working
on.