Sentences with phrase «team played badly»

When we lose it is always our fault but when we win it is always because the opposing team played badly.

Completely ignoring the fact that Ramsey has just returned from injury and that the whole Arsenal team played badly, the 23 - year old was blamed for the way Arsenal drew and then lost against Anderlecht and then Swansea City after being in the lead.

After all it was only his first competitive game for the Gunners and as Arsene Wenger said, the whole team played badly.

Shut up you muppet Your a totaly blinkerd fool And why are people coming on here slating English fans all the time How do you know what we think Arsenal is an English club in an English league so we should be allowed an opinion without being categorised The games we lost the whole team played badly The games we won we were having our best run of form for a long time All because jack is injured ha,, you haven't got it all figured out

Let's all be ready for more heart breaks, nowadays we win matches not because we played well but because the other team played badly.

The reason why the team plays badly is because he is constantly playing them out of position, it must be very degrading as a player being told to play in the wrong position and being professional has absolutely nothing to do with it.

You're right although anyone can argue the fact that if half the team plays bad it does not matter how the other half plays.

it would be by pure luck with the above teams playing worse than us and us barely beating teams by 1 - 4 points.

Maybe a team or two pulling that tactic every few years is different than double digits of team playing the worst basketball they can for multiple years.

People always make him in to a scapegoat when they dare not to mention how our whole team plays badly.

Two or three times a week, I drank things that could have gotten get me arrested, grilled things that made me fatter, shivered uncontrollably in the -49 º wind chill, and watched a bad Giants team play bad baseball.

Maybe he's not in fitt but the talent never leave.If you take a new player and wait him for developing you can wait as mutch as for Walcott.But Wilshere is one of the best English players after Rooney, at the same level with Sterling I can say.Is a briliant player when he's in fitt, let's be honest when he play bad, our team play bad to, if he wasn't injuried now when our team play well, I'm sure he play well too.We need a new midfielder this summer, I think Gotze could be perfect for creation with Wilshere, and Coquelin in their back to secure defence.I don't know why but when I see this to player's first, in 2010 - 2011, I see them as better as Iniesta - Xavi.

If they were 0 - 2 it would be a serious matter but there is a huge difference between «team plays badly, gets in a big hole» and «team plays badly but still pulls out a win».

For certain players he has turned the team upside down to accomodate them, in particular cesc and Sanchez and that ultimately leads to the team playing no worse after the player leaves even though in both examples the player was never replaced like for like.

NFL WEEK 15 Preview The match - ups for NFL Week 15 are rather lackluster: either good teams playing bad teams, or bad teams play bad teams.

The whole team played bad.

Or do Arsenal fans just use Ozil as a scapegoat when the whole team plays badly against the bigger sides?

He just makes the team play badly.

What's dumbfounding is how the whole team plays bad, It's understandable for one or two players to have a bad game but not the whole f# ## ing team?

One betting theory in the NFL is that when good teams play bad teams, bet the bad team.

Peter Crouch — I just feel sorry for him, because teams always lump the ball at him when he's playing, even though he's a very good player, which ironically makes the team play badly.

Not exact matches

«I think one of the things that this team is lacking that hurts them the most is not having the true leaders like we had last year and guys that, when things go bad... I feel like when things go bad, this team struggles a little with bouncing back and making good plays.»

It's difficult for them to play the game if the team bus is always breaking down, if bad press is destroying morale, or if the doctor you have on staff is too busy running his private practice to be around.

Just as you'd counsel your favorite sports team, don't let a bad play derail the entire game.

It was a gutsy move for a team playing nearly a decade's worth of bad football in an outdated stadium, dishing out the equivalent of about $ 300 million in today's dollars.

If so, I must be a bad parent for letting my son play on a little - league team that allows boys and girls to play together... it must promote violence and promiscuity...

I have tried with a couple teams and just how terrible I am at slow pitch threatened to erase all the years I played fastball and wasn't half bad.

«Bad decisions, fantasy football, PlayStation football, tricks and when you stopped to play as a team and when you stopped to play seriously I don't like and you gamble a little bit.

Oout team is playing very badly.

People killed the MCW trade... and then it turned out that we got a lottery pick for a guy who, two years later, was barely playing on an atrocious Chicago Bulls team and, this year, is averaging fewer than 5 points in 16 minutes a night for a bad Hornets team.

When we don't bury our chances it's us playing badly... Don't give other teams the credit of «luck» when no - one gives our players the same courtesy, myself included.

it is his fault Bolly from Borehamwood He gets paid in excess of eight million a year to have alternatives when things go bad, to motivate players when the run of play is against them, to buy players who are capable and good enough to NOT hit the woodwork time and time again, to sell players who are off form and who fail to deliver on thier promised talent, in effect TO MANAGE the team.

There are games where we are playing badly but he is still creating chances or passing amazing balls on and nothing happens from his team mates.

We've played a month of baseball, and most of the bad teams have proven that they're unequivocally bad.

This Arsenal team is the worse I have seen in 30 years of watching Arsenal play — even the days of Ian Selley, John Jensen and Glenn Helder.

Leo you said remy was crap against spuds but you have got to consider who he is playing with he is in a very poor team who create nothing for him put him in our team and with chances we create he will score goals he is a natural goalscorer and i think he would do a great job in girouds absence, think we should keep podolski for extra cover in forward area be realistic we will not get falcao or cavarni therefore remy would not be the worse option!!

Not much you can do when the referee is so shockingly bad and the opposing team would rather slap people in faces and be diving and acting champions instead of playing football.

I think our RB position is a worry for me considering the standard that Bellerin has set there and CM can be considered wer a physically built player in the shape of kondogbia won't be a bad fit incase we play teams who want to bully us physically.

When the team is playing badly he doesn't know what the hell to do, ie Arsenal vs Bayern Munich 1st Leg Arsenal was playing well he was able to inspire the team but the second leg injuries came Arsenal played badly why?

I read a report today that said the reason they are playing so badly is that some of the team resent the wages of Ozil, Aubameyang and Mkhitaryan.

I do nt think there will be any replacement for flamini Arteta will cover for coq but if arteta is injured as well then we can deploy chambers and in worst case if he is also injured we can use santi there It is very difficult to find some one who is ready to play second fiddle to coq Forget benders or krychowaik they will demand first team football straight away

And pretending any of the mentioned guys taken after Ebron would have had the same production in Detroit as they did on another team is 100 % speculation which I would think anybody who has watched the NFL long enough to see a player go from one team to another and play better / worse would be wary of.

We didn't play that bad, actually we were the better team just that the luck didn't go our way... it happens.

Playing FCS teams is already bad, but to play them in week 12 should be penalized.

I personally would feel a lot safer knowing he is our second choice RB instead of Jenkinson who has gone from being one of the better West Ham players last season to playing badly, conceding penalties and losing his place in their team.

Wilshere for all his injuries is far better than both Ramsey and Xhaka.I just don't know the importance of Xhaka in the team if he can't defend.He's the real problem in the squad.Why do fans keep accepting mediocrity?Aren't we tired?It's painful seeing him play every match in our midfield then the same people who claim to love him would come and be making noise about how average he is after a bad match forgetting that he's actually average.I'd easily play Maitland - Niles or Coquelin over Xhaka.They would provide more steel in the midfield.Is it going to take us four seasons to realize how average Xhaka is?The painful things is that by that time many trophies would've have by passed us.

That was obviously an example to make the point that a team generally plays to its quality rather than being substantially improved by a good coach or made worse by a bad coach.

I can nitpick on each of our 14 players performance in this game if i want, but I happen to think that overall, obtaining a draw against a title contender playing away, especially playing with 10 men for almost 45 minutes, was not such a bad result after all, not only if the standard is applied to a fragile team such as AFC, but also if it were to be applied to some other «fantastic» team such as for example, Leicester... I can imagine that if we were to loose the game the way Leicester did at the Emirates, many (visitors to this site) would be condemning our players bottlers, chokers instead of hailing them for defending bravely for 20 minutes with 10 men... LOL..

Outdated ideas, bad rotation, tactics, system, plays players out of position, does not make the necessary signings to strengthen the team in the transfer window, is uninspiring on his warm seat, talks media school b@llocks in press conferences and is generally aloof.

that tactic worked fantastically at the star of this season where walcott performed and it worked brilliantly for the team but after the injury of Theo, giroud had his dry patch and theo almost did nt even try... and the year before welbeck played reaaaally bad as a starting striker and scored 4 goals or something i think, if he had one worldclass or equally good striker as giroud, we would have enough and wenger could rotate them according to the patch / form of giroud like what he intended to do with walcott and giroud, which i had high hopes for but sadly only worked for half the season