Sentences with phrase «team sizes mean»

Due to recent growth, our larger team sizes mean we need to expand our management team.

Our small team size means you'll be able to make a big impact, while our funding will give you the runway to do just that.

Sociologists John P. Walsh and You - Na Lee of the School of Public Policy at the Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta wondered what this increase in team size meant for the way that scientific projects are conducted.

The three - team interplay works perfectly for CoD's turn - on - a-dime pacing, and the smaller team size means that big streaks feels more rewarding to the team and more impressive as an individual combatant.

Not exact matches

«We have a global operation which means we have scale in size but we have local management teams that are very sensitive and very understanding of the local cultures and tastes.

Include the cost of building the new stadium and it is evident that overr this period the Arsenal have punched above their weight 3) There is a stong correlation 90 % between the size of the wage bill and success in terms of winning trophies (in 2011 Arsenal 5th) 4) Arsenal supporters expectations for their team and manager are far too high — the EPL is beyond their means at present.

With squad sizes getting ever bigger and the competition for honours always increasing, however, first team opportunities are harder to come by — meaning that a number of these youngsters will find themselves loaned out over the course of the season.

I honestly do not think Wenger has much more to offer us, his best years are behind him but then I want to take solace in the appointment of Henry as assistant coach to the u18s and see that as Wenger's imminent exit strategy; I mean if we look at the volume of transfer activities in the last couple of seasons in and out of our youth teams and the quality of the signings, it's been a bit strange, for good example, Chelsea baulked at the size of Donyell Malen's wages [at 3.6 million pounds over three years] but Arsenal of all clubs, oddly so signed him up.

No matter how you slice it, you can't run an uptempo offence with Giroud on the pitch and that means sideways soccer and an over-reliance on crosses into the box, thereby negating many of the very reasons Lacazette was on your radar in the first place... we simply aren't clinical enough from wide positions to continue with that approach, which is why many fans have been clamoring for a viable alternative to Giroud for several years... once again this isn't an attack on Giroud, he clearly has some tangible skills, but his mere presence on the pitch greatly impacts your tactical options... Giroud's weaknesses are simply highlighted by the way in which our offence now moves in a more horizontal than vertical manner, which allows most teams ample time to regroup defensively before a scoring opportunity even arises... a player of Ibra's or Benzema's ilk would have been far more effective as they had size, speed and the first touch capabilities required to for intricate link - up play... once again square peg in a round hole

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

But as William Borucki, the head of NASA's Kepler team, points out, Earth - size does not mean Earth - like.

But the size of the observed bloom could mean that current estimates of the rates of so - called primary production — the production of organic molecules that results from phytoplankton consuming nutrients and photosynthesizing — on the Arctic continental shelf may be as much as 10 times too low, the team reports online today in Science.

The team's work, however, shows that propagation time grows as a power of its size, meaning that while quantum computers may be able to solve problems that ordinary computers find devilishly complex, their processors will not be speed demons.

Earth - size may not mean habitable The team, which also included planet hunter Geoffrey Marcy, UC Berkeley professor of astronomy, cautioned that Earth - size planets in Earth - size orbits are not necessarily hospitable to life, even if they orbit in the habitable zone of a star where the temperature is not too hot and not too cold.

As for the reused animations and such, its only natural since the Smash Dev team has undoubtedly shrunk in size so that means the few people left have to optimize what they have which in this case means reusing assets.

This means you'll be getting more work done than you were before, but with the same size team.

Avoiding one - size - fits - all means doing what the Breaking2 team did in custom - fitting shoes and gear to the individual characteristics of each runner.

A team the size of Robot Entertainment's means that their resources are smaller than most, so keeping to one or two platform releases certainly makes sense.

Team Deathmatch, Control, and Distance King (a free - for - all mode wherein the player with the most kill distance wins) can be a good bit of fun in their own right, but the sheer size of the maps in multiplayer means that sniping is going to be of paramount importance if your team is going to win, and No Cross emphasizes this fact better than any other mode in the gTeam Deathmatch, Control, and Distance King (a free - for - all mode wherein the player with the most kill distance wins) can be a good bit of fun in their own right, but the sheer size of the maps in multiplayer means that sniping is going to be of paramount importance if your team is going to win, and No Cross emphasizes this fact better than any other mode in the gteam is going to win, and No Cross emphasizes this fact better than any other mode in the game.

That also means it's possible to take your six - driver club into a race against another like - sized squad in the 12 - player online showdowns and work together to block paths, nudge foes into barriers, and secure a team victory.

Either we just give up on all single attempts to do broad surveys of the creative landscape (which seems to be what has happened) or we need to take the job much more seriously.What this means is that a single (modest size) museum or small team of curators is just not up to the job.

It means that sophisticated clients will look beyond size and focus on the team.

«Their concept of right - sized thinking means that their clients get excellent service and exemplary work undertaken by the right lawyer or team.»

The increasing size and scale of business deals these days means that more and more areas of commercial law requires law firms to field teams.

That doesn't mean that what large law department teams are doing isn't terrific; it means that you need to look past the largest legal departments by size, both on the CLOC reg list and in the profession at large, to see many of the more interesting, creative, scalable and sustainable practices hiding in plain sight in smaller and medium - sized legal departments.

That means facts and numbers, such as revenues, EBITDA, size of team, number of locations, etc..

Our Medical Assistants team directly with a provider and manage a patient panel nearly 1/3 the size of a traditional office - meaning longer appointment times that start on time.