Sentences with phrase «teams look better on paper»

Some teams look better on paper than they do on TV, and others ace the eye test but have glaring underlying problems.

i believe arsenal will win... does nt matter if city's team look better on paper.

Not exact matches

I think this could be a legit top 10 team next year (with lots of proven talent, rather than a team that just looks good on paper).

For example, look at Ballotelli for Liverpool he was a good signing for team on paper, but how he fared is too far from comparision

It's funny how he said we are better than Liverpool overrall forgetting that in terms of players we were still better than them last season yet the beat us home and away.Liverpool team is not so good yet out of all the top four team they're the ones who play their hearts out.That's why Liverpool didn't lose a single game to a top four team last season though on paper they should have.As for Tottenham if you look at their team they just need a few more signings and consistency so I don't know what's the big deal about them.The painful this is they could've won the league if not for draws.It was a disgrace for any of those two to finish over us last season because on paper it shouldn't be so.This should tell you that it's not all about the team you have.Some it's about luck, sometimes it's about giving your best and sometimes it's just meant to be.

You obviously look at week to week results, klopp has a meddioca team and lacks depth compared with Arsenal and Arsenal players, yes they have one or two great players but we have a better team on paper, I was tring to make a point that we need a manager who multi tasks with ambition agretion and caring, it's clear now that AW lacks ambition yes he would like to win trophies but not this way

Look man I hear you but I mean objectively not because we're fan of this club... on paper overall we have a better team than Spurs & Leicester, we have more overall talent but fail to produce that is the bottom line... Always the same issues come up & we're talking about it over and over on website & youtube channels like Arsenal TV.

In what looked like the best match of the night on paper, these three teams wasted no time stealing the show.

Yes looks good on paper — but a re-think may be in order, clearly something not quite right with this French team at the moment despite the star - studded midfield talent.

But when people are saying we should sign X-player who contributed well last season while playing every single game for «depth» sure, on paper it looks great, but a lot of players hit patches of form that may not necessarily be given that opportunity here, as there may be someone else in the squad who hits the ground running and contributes straight away... If Coquelin, Arteta, Flamini, Wilshere, Ramsey, AOC, Ozil, Cazorla, Rosicky are all fit and firing, I think you're sorely mistaken if you think anything but a truly world - class midfielder would be looking at those names and not potentially evaluating their first - team opportunities.

I don't know what would make this team good, as on paper we look good.

the reason we are looking at so many French talents: a) French players settle well in london and at Arsenal b) the French team has an abundance of talented kids in all areas of the pitch they should be winning trophies in the next decade on paper.

So, these players who at least on paper look good, get first - team Premier League football.

I started googling way back in may who could we be buying gonzalo higuian, julio cesar and wayne rooney but realize going by history wenger just as no interest in buying world class players, he wants 2 buy d grade players and turn them up to koscienly nd nasri that will take years while da arsenal faithful pay handsome figures for dismal performances, fans allowed wenger 2 get away when he gets away with these lucky matches of fenerbache been strong on paper but a waste of tym on the pitch, also it happen at bayern but they put a slighty weak team but wenger runt his mouth around of how good da team was after that 2 - 0 win, not forgetting it was bould that got the team defense looking solid while wenger moan about referee decisions and no blame on team, I just feel we (arsenal) have allowed wenger and co to misuse us, so now our main target aim is benzema yet giroud plays more often than him for france, can any1 see how wenger is lowing our standards and expectations at arsenal, I wil be over da moon if wenger does not sign an extension wit us, after the gilberto days and disaterous results and teams we play, his approach to the game defensely which is pathetic and his annoying behaviour.So what if manu and chelski haven't really bought they are already strong it was seen last week now we should be worried about our selves since that villa defeat, jst imagine what the man's and london money maniac's are goin 2 do to us, I can see it already coming from wenger, if we find the right player we will buy him, after sept2, we didn't find da right player but the squad can challenge for the title, its so sick having 2 hear that crap, just take him psg, I just wish the fans would say we had enough of this bullshit transfer policies its time we stood up against these pigs of directors by protesting!

«Everybody speaks about Atletico Madrid that they look the strongest team on paper, but you must say when you look at the results that Salzburg have done again... I am from France and Marseille are in there as well and that is always a difficult place to go... maybe it is better that I don't wish for anybody.»

Stoke, on paper, look a decent team; the addition of Zouma, on loan from Chelsea, will tighten an already good defence.

Philadelphia (+3.5) at Denver Broncos On paper, Philadelphia looks the better team.

Is how a team «looks on paper» an indicator of just how good they will be on the field?

While the deal may look good on paper, it can turn into a nightmare with the wrong tenant, or wrong management team.