If the team play well Ozil adds class and chances, if
the team play poorly he is not the guy to do something about that, as you say he disappears.
These are very generous ratings overall
the team played poorly and created no chances.
When the team plays what they call well and fails to score they curse and when
the team plays poorly according to them but wins the game they still curse!
His MOTM was well deserved, even if
the team played poorly / average
The team cohesion is not there yet and this can be attributed to our engine or heart of
the team playing poorly (Ramsey / Flamini or Ramsey / Arteta combo).
Why take away the ND effort by saying
your team played poorly?
It is too soon to say whether that will be the case or not, because even though he was a bit below par in our last game, which saw Arsenal humbled 4 - 0 by Liverpool at Anfield, it was his first game of the season at club level and the whole Arsenal
team played poorly.
He's a great defender despite usually being the scapegoat when the whole
team plays poorly.
Not exact matches
At the beginning of last season we won more games with Ozil at 10, Ramsey b2b he was scoring and with Jack Wilshere benched he's the reason we not winning enough he stops the flow of slick passing like the Galatasary game we were good without him as soon as he comes back we are
play poorly as a
team!
If you take away their Week 1 L to
Team Jones where they just
played really
poorly — they have had 3 Games and all of them have been decided by a combined 12 points..
We prepared ourselves for this torture when the
team was
playing super
poorly and our so called manager could not do a single twist to save us, till it's too late and now his fans are calling him genius coz of changing the formation (when it was already too late)
Only got off work in time to see the second half but noticed Sane
played poorly and overall the
team was bleak and out of it.
His
team had
played poorly, except for Hogue's 36 - point effort, 20 more than his average.
Other time you lose because you
play poorly or the other
team plays great.
The Padres are
playing poorly against good
teams.
The fact that Cazorla appears to be
playing poorly is as a result of Ozil coming into the
team.
Same situation but lucky deflection resulting in a loss and
team will be described a
playing poorly and getting the result they deserved.
There have been numerous times this season where we have
played poorly against bad
teams.
I may have been a bit harsh after driving the hour back home from watching a
poorly played game overall for the
team.
Arsenal were
playing poorly for most of this season and the five or six games we
played like champions were mostly against lesser
teams, yet the wisdom was that we were drawing games we used to lose, that we have more depth in the squad than ever etc..
What he is capable of is
playing for a draw when his
team is
playing poorly or has injuries or he is facing a stronger
team.
The Gunners started
poorly in the domestic league as well but have largely put that right and, as Wenger reminded us all in the press conference today reported by the Arsenal website, our last game was an excellent away win at Leicester City, a
team that had started like a rocket, were
playing very well and had not lost a game until last weekend.
They were
playing poorly and Wenger set the
team tactically ok even though he sould have been more reactive after the 1st goal.
It speaks
poorly of the veteran leaders (including the fucking guys like Manning that the
team is supposed to love so much that we have to
play them even though they suck), and it speaks
poorly of the coach.
After half - time, Alex had a rough couple of series early, then seemed to settle down, but the rest of the
team was
playing poorly.
The rest of the
team is struggling to
play that formation and as a result, we are
playing poorly.
For a
team at a critical stage of trying to obtain a site and financing a new stadium, don't think that allowing the
team to
play poorly and doing nothing may be an option and Cash could be the fall guy.
That feels about right: Farrell made mistakes in games, and was criticized for how he
played matchups and his bullpen usage, but he was also popular with his players because he was a guy who could keep the clubhouse together and stood up for them, even when the
team was
playing poorly.
We should be aware that even when Ozil was
playing poorly and was costing the
team, Wenger kept picking him.
4) Santi may be our stand out player at the moment (along with Alexis)
playing in a central role — but let's not kid ourselves — he is a stand out player in a
poorly performing
team.
i remember us
playing poorly in nearly every game and unable to beat any of the top
teams except liverpool once.
And we know that while USC has
played poorly enough in 2013 to get its coach fired before the end of September, UCLA has
played better than all but three or four
teams in the country so far this season.
Those of you that have
played football in a
team to a certain level will know just how much of an effect these sorts of moany players have with their constant sniping and bellyaching in the dressing room - it leads to hassle and a
poorly performing
team.
Us and Liv were the only
teams that beat Leicester, I feel we would have had a better shot if the other big
teams hadn't of
played so
poorly.
The lack of focus for the Liverpool game was vintage up and down Arsenal and vintage
poorly prepared for the PL to start and vintage out of the blue redicoulous
team selection that included 20 % players who didn't want to
play for Arsenal and other 30 % (Bellerin, Ox, Monreal) being
played out of position.
I guess I am thinking overall body of work (i.e., last year) and maybe, the eye test general trend of how
poorly this
team plays in the 4th quarter.
A month before his signature game against Mourning in the worlds, he
played so
poorly at the Goodwill Games in Seattle that he lost his starting job on the Aussie
team.
Yea, cause he
played against Everton when they are low on morale, Everton that are
playing very
poorly due to the high no of players signed.the problem is he has never
played well against technically strong and physical
teams like Stoke, Chelsea, bayern...... simply put, he doesn't have the balls................
All year the games have been marred by sloppy
play from
poorly rested
teams and paled in comparison to not only superior offerings on Sunday but the FX and NBC comedies that were on opposite the games.
With all due respect to him, if he's struggling to break into West Brom's side, then no, he's not yet ready for us... Regardless, Iwobi and Campbell have only
played a handful of games for us, one with our 2nd's
team who as a whole
played poorly isn't enough to go by.
Isn't it just crazy that when big
teams are
playing poorly, we still find a way to be worse than them when we
play them every time!
Wenger's
teams of recent years usually don't respond to the pressures brought about by other
teams going ahead of them on the table, or it seems even worse when they have what should be an easy fixture
played after other top
teams do
poorly.
Still, considering how
poorly all the other allegedly good
teams in the NBA are
playing — those in the Midwest Division excepted — Atlanta is presently just as qualified to get walloped by Milwaukee as anybody else.
I wonder if Wenger also said that to remind his own players by having a dig at other
teams, if AFC now
play poorly all the players can be blamed for
playing like they was on holiday...
Now their fans won't have to endlessly relive the memories of a collapse that baseball had never seen before, one where the top
team in the majors
played so
poorly in the second half — and not the mathematical second half, either, since this is baseball we're talking about — that they missed out on the playoffs entirely.
The smaller
teams have stepped up their game and are
playing to their potential unlike last year which is the reason you see established
teams like Villa, Newcastle, United and Chelsea doing so
poorly.
For example, a fan of a
team may know a batter's vulnerability to a certain type of pitcher, or some players» tendencies to
play poorly in early games.
Trading a generational talent with six years of control remaining because the
team is
playing poorly right now and everyone feels like crap is about the most shortsighted thing the front office could do.
Undoubtedly the
team has looked unorganized and lacklustre at times, and
played poorly, particularly in New York, Foxborough and during the first - half in Columbus, but is that so surprising given all the changes?
It's Hull up first for the Clarets in the Professional Development League as we look for just our second win of the season against a home side who, having started
poorly, have won their last two games against Cardiff and Coventry with the second, a home fixture, being
played in the KCOM Stadium immediately after a home first
team game.