Sentences with phrase «teams with winning»

Spread trends (all records against the spread): Buffalo 7 - 3 to teams with a winning record and 4 - 12 off bye week.

Betting Trends (1/12 to 1/18) Favorites went 28 - 22 (56.0 %) ATS Home teams went 29 - 18 (61.7 %) ATS Overs went 24 - 25 (48.9 %) Teams with winning records went 22 - 22 (50.0 %)-LSB-...]

Betting Trends (3/2 to 3/8) Favorites went 23 - 29 (44.2 %) ATS Home teams went 29 - 23 (55.8 %) ATS Unders went 27 - 26 (50.9 %) Teams with winning records went 13 - 31 (29.5 %)-LSB-...]

Tampa is 0 - 8 in IL games to teams with a winning record.

Betting Trends Favorites went 9 - 5 (64.3 %) ATS Road teams went 7 - 6 (53.8 %) ATS Unders went 11 - 3 (78.6 %) Betting against the public (< 35 % of tickets): 1 - 6 (14.3 %) ATS Teams with a winning -LSB-...]

43 - 18 ATS over their last 61 games overall; 21 - 5 ATS over their last 26 road games; 9 - 1 ATS over their last 10 against teams with winning records; 8 - 0 ATS over their last eight games after accumulating more than 280 passing yards in their previous game.

Though Michigan State is 5 - 1 against the spread over its last six against teams with winning records, it's just 3 - 8 ATS over its last 11 contests as an underdog.

Spread betting trends (all records are against the spread): Army is 6 - 1 as road underdogs, yet 7 - 18 as an underdog of 3.5 - 10.0, 2 - 8 to teams with a winning record.

Though LSU is 2 - 5 ATS over its last seven against teams with winning records and 1 - 4 ATS over its last five games as a favorite, the Tigers have fared well at the sportsbook in their recent bowl games.

Spread betting trends (all records are against the spread): The Tigers are 5 - 12 to teams with a winning record, 0 - 5 after allowing less than 275 total yards in their previous game.

Alabama found itself overvalued against the college football betting spread in big games this year; the Crimson Tide are 1 - 4 ATS over their last five games against teams with winning records.

In fact, they only beat two teams with a winning record: New Orleans (without David West or Tyson Chandler) and the Phoenix Suns (by two points).

Houston over 6 - 1 after allowing more than 250 yards passing in their previous game, over 22 - 8 to teams with a winning record, over 21 - 7 following a ATS loss, over 21 - 9 after accumulating more than 350 total yards in their previous game.

Betting Trends (2/23 to 3/2) Favorites went 25 - 31 (44.6 %) ATS Road teams went 30 - 26 (53.6 %) ATS Unders went 39 - 17 (69.6 %) Teams with winning records went 21 - 26 (44.7 %)-LSB-...]

Joe Flacco has led the Ravens to seven wins this season, none of which have come against teams with a winning record.

Betting road favorites against teams with winning percentages of 40 % or less in April has gone 184 - 128 (59 %) ATS, + $ 4,768 since 2005.

Betting Trends (2/2 to 2/8) Favorites went 27 - 25 (51.9 %) ATS Road teams went 27 - 25 (51.9 %) ATS Overs went 27 - 25 (51.9 %) Teams with winning records went 25 - 21 (54.3 %)-LSB-...]

Team's with a losing record have gone 700-685-39 (50.5 %) ATS vs. teams with a winning record.

Note: This system doesn't just bet teams with losing ATS records against teams with winning ATS records.

The Jazz are the only West team with more games remaining against teams with losing records (10) than against teams with winning records (9).

Considering teams who are hovering around the.500 mark are still competing for a playoff spot, we chose to examine teams with a winning percentage of less than 40 %.

Teams with a winning percentage of 55 % or higher usually don't have much to play for down the stretch.

Teams with a winning percentage of 80 % or less have gone 5 - 0 ATS when their opponent has a superior record.

In fact, there are currently just five AFC teams and six NFC teams with winning records which shows the drastic divide between the league's best and worst teams.

In our database, teams with a winning record have gone 21 - 13 ATS.

In fact, there are currently just five AFC teams and six NFC teams with winning records...

When teams with a winning record face off against teams with a losing record, our system improves to 12 - 4 ATS.

When we hide duplicate game matches and eliminate any game where two teams with a winning percentage of greater than 80 % faced off, that record improves to 92 - 63 ATS (59.4 %).

Trend to know: Under Brad Stevens, the Celtics are 65 - 45 (59.1 %) ATS vs. Eastern conference teams with a winning record.

The Warriors are 22 -11-1 ATS in the regular season under Kerr when facing teams with a winning percentage of 70 + %.

We already knew from last season's analysis that mediocre teams (defined by teams with a winning percentage of less than 60 %) have been undervalued when they square off with the league's elite (opponent winning percentage of at least 60 %).

The UNDER is 9 - 1 in Auburn's last 10 games against teams with winning records.

Clemson's beaten five FBS teams with winning records, and Michigan's only beaten three.

Over their last five games against teams with winning records, the Sooners are a perfect 5 - 0 SU and ATS.

Michigan is 11 - 0 SU and 9 - 2 ATS over its last 11 games, a stretch that includes an 8 - 0 SU and 7 - 1 ATS record against teams with winning records.

Northwestern proceeded to struggle in close games, lose to three teams with winning records, and finish a disappointing 5 - 7.

«we added the opponent win percentage filter and focused solely on teams with a winning percentage of at least 60 %.»

Teams with a winning percentage of greater than 90 % have gone just 25 - 39 ATS in late season games, which indicates that this could be an excellent opportunity to sell high on the Panthers.

Past research has uncovered that huge underdogs have historically underperformed against ranked teams, so I opted to eliminate these bottom feeders by setting the «Team Win %» filter between 51 % and 100 % — this way our analysis focuses on teams with a winning record.

Top teams with a winning mentality just get on with it.

The hypothesis was that mediocre teams (defined by teams with a winning percentage of less than 60 %) would be undervalued when they play against the top teams in baseball (opponent winning percentage of at least 60 %).

If you narrow down the regular season sample size and only look at teams with winning percentages of 60 or greater, this trend doesn't hold true.

The Week 15 slate of NFL games features just one game between teams with winning records, although several matchups include teams with losing records that are still very much in the postseason hunt.

All the Broncos have done is whip up on more teams with winning records — seven — than any other club.

When we examine teams with a winning percentage of at least 65 %, our ROI doubles to 14.2 %.

Four out of their last six games are against teams with winning records, including two against the Eastern Conference leading Cleveland Cavaliers and one against the Toronto Raptors.

Ten of those wins have come against teams with winning records and more than half of them have come on the road.

However, Darnold carried a lot of the weight for the USC offense, ranked No. 6 in passer rating among Power 5 QBs in games against teams with winning records, and threw for 4,143 yards and 31 touchdowns while rushing for another five TDs as a short - yardage option.

There are only three games in Week 11 between teams with winning records as the postseason race starts to tighten up.

The Ravens are one of two teams with a winning playoff road record at 10 - 5 while quarterback Joe Flacco holds the record with seven road playoff wins and he will arrive off the back of an impressive performance against the Pittsburgh Steelers.