Maibach, who is now working on a further project to measure the effects the views of weathercasters have on their audience, added: «Most members of the public consider
television weather reporters to be a trusted source of information about global warming - only scientists are viewed as more trustworthy.»
For
television weather reporters, those figures were 66 % in 2008, and 56 % in 2010.
Levels of trust in
television weather reporters, the mainstream news media, and scientists as sources of information about global warming have also dropped since June 2010 (by 9, 7, and 5 points respectively).
Not exact matches
Third, the decline of science journalism; where Walter Sullivan and his like had admired the scientific community and were respected in turn, many of the media people who now attempted to explain science, such as the «
weather»
reporters on
television, scarcely understood what they were dealing with.
And therefore, you get the kind of
television coverage we've seen around Superstorm Sandy: anchors talking for hours about a broken crane in New York City;
reporters sitting for hours in the middle of a flooded street saying very little new about water levels; and the complete avoidance of any scientific explanation of the factors driving extreme
weather.