Sentences with phrase «temperature becomes stable»

At that point, the temperature becomes stable, and the system is in «equilibrium».

Not exact matches

UHT Soup - Soup which has been heat treated via ultra-high temperature (UHT) processing to become shelf - stable over a long period of time.

This made the already stable catalyst become very active at the low cold - start temperatures.

Transitioning cats to raw has become somewhat easier since the introduction of freeze - dried diets, which are shelf stable and can be rehydrated with warm water, preventing cats from dismissing it purely because of its temperature.

I almost got bored, but was drawn back in when it became obvious that there was a clear IPCC intent seemingly supported by the scientists themselves, to paint a fraudulent picture of past temperatures by the strange structuring of the hokey - stick chart — it inferred a stable past temperature, but I knew it had been naturally oscillatory.

To point out just a couple of things: — oceans warming slower (or cooling slower) than lands on long - time trends is absolutely normal, because water is more difficult both to warm or to cool (I mean, we require both a bigger heat flow and more time); at the contrary, I see as a non-sense theory (made by some serrist, but don't know who) that oceans are storing up heat, and that suddenly they will release such heat as a positive feedback: or the water warms than no heat can be considered ad «stored» (we have no phase change inside oceans, so no latent heat) or oceans begin to release heat but in the same time they have to cool (because they are losing heat); so, I don't feel strange that in last years land temperatures for some series (NCDC and GISS) can be heating up while oceans are slightly cooling, but I feel strange that they are heating up so much to reverse global trend from slightly negative / stable to slightly positive; but, in the end, all this is not an evidence that lands» warming is led by UHI (but, this effect, I would not exclude it from having a small part in temperature trends for some regional area, but just small); both because, as writtend, it is normal to have waters warming slower than lands, and because lands» temperatures are often measured in a not so precise way (despite they continue to give us a global uncertainity in TT values which is barely the instrumental's one)-- but, to point out, HadCRU and MSU of last years (I mean always 2002 - 2006) follow much better waters» temperatures trend; — metropolis and larger cities temperature trends actually show an increase in UHI effect, but I think the sites are few, and the covered area is very small worldwide, so the global effect is very poor (but it still can be sensible for regional effects); but I would not run out a small warming trend for airport measurements due mainly to three things: increasing jet planes traffic, enlarging airports (then more buildings and more asphalt — if you follow motor sports, or simply live in a town / city, you will know how easy they get very warmer than air during day, and how much it can slow night - time cooling) and overall having airports nearer to cities (if not becoming an area inside the city after some decade of hurban growth, e.g. Milan - Linate); — I found no point about UHI in towns and villages; you will tell me they are not large cities; but, in comparison with 20-40-60 years ago when they were «countryside», many small towns and villages have become part of larger hurban areas (at least in Europe and Asia) so examining just larger cities would not be enough in my opinion to get a full view of UHI effect (still remembering that it has a small global effect: we can say many matters are due to UHI instead of GW, maybe even that a small part of measured GW is due to UHI, and that GW measurements are not so precise to make us able to make good analisyses and predictions, but not that GW is due to UHI).

Ingersoll [105] discussed the role of water vapours in the «runaway greenhouse effect» that caused the surface of Venus to eventually become so hot that carbon was «baked» from the planet's crust, creating a hothouse climate with almost 100 bars of CO2 in the air and a surface temperature of about 450 °C, a stable state from which there is no escape.

Political structures can also become less stable as temperatures rise, according to the research team.

Were PDO and AMO alone to be responsible for this shift — and we have seen ocean circulation shifts dramatically affect the Arctic before, in particular the shift that drove up temperatures in Svalbard about 100 years ago — it could become semi-permanent or stable.

I guess the climate, above 1.1 C, will eventually become stable and, presumably, at a lower temperature, the lower we can manage to keep the transient response?