Sentences with phrase «temperature fluctuations between»

Could you cite the exact section and words where the IPCC emphatically attributes the temperature fluctuations between the mid 1940's tand mid-1950s to anthropogenic aerosols while excluding natural variability?

I can't find a single person who will affirm that all the effects within a 24 hour day, including massive temperature fluctuations between day and night, is due to one rotation of the planet and that these days never, ever fall out of step with rotations.The ideology which contemporaries have inherited from the late 17th century is that the Earth's rotation falls out of step with 24 hour days to the tune of 4 extra rotations in 4 years by virtue of an utterly stupid idea that the planet's daily and orbital motions can be modeled directly from a rotating celestial sphere of Ra / Dec observing.

Not exact matches

«Sometimes we find reefs that are doing very, very well in places that you would least expect to find them,» says Gates — such as a reef off Taiwan that lies below the waste - water outfall pipe of a nuclear power plant and experiences temperature fluctuations of between 6 °C and 8 °C per day.

The fact that there is poor correspondence between the individual amplitudes of the band - passed filtered signals (Fig. 4 in Scafetta & West, 2005) is another sign indicating that the fluctuations associated with a frequency band in temperature is not necessarily related to solar variability.

But, between 1900 and 2012, they concluded that humanity's temperature - changing influence paled in comparison with that of the intense natural fluctuations of the wild winds and waters of the world's largest ocean.

llustration showing fluctuations between regions of two different local structures (high density as red and low density liquid as blue) of water that depend on the temperature.

Stay Warm: Dress in layers so that you can be prepared for the fluctuations of heat and cold between inside temperatures and outside.

Together with the insulation effect, temperature fluctuations at the wall surface can be reduced from between — 10 ° / 14 °F to 60 °C / 140 °F to between 5 °C / 41 °F and 30 ° / 86 °F.

Finally, Monckton claims, the IPCC selected the biggest 20th century temperature fluctuation (remember, ignoring the relationship between sun and temperature for a 150 - year span from year 1750 to year 1900).

From my limited perspective two of the strongest arguments against AGW are the LOD problem and the fact that only ice sheet extension (hence, temperature) explains the correlation between Milankovitch Cycles and CO2 fluctuations in the ice cores; that is, T forces CO2 or both are forced in tandem by ice sheet extension.

For example, Brown and Caldeira (2017) use fluctuations in Earth's top - of - the - atmosphere (TOA) energy budget and their correlation with the response of climate models to increases in GHG concentrations to infer that ECS lies between 3 and 4.2 K with 50 % probability, and most likely is 3.7 K. Assuming t statistics, this roughly corresponds to an ECS range that in IPCC parlance is considered likely (66 % probability) between 2.8 and 4.5 K. By contrast, Cox et al. (2018) use fluctuations of the global - mean temperature and their correlation with the response of climate models to increases in GHG concentrations to infer that ECS likely lies between 2.2 and 3.4 K, and most likely is 2.8 K.

Much of the warming, he says, stems from fluctuations in temperature that have occurred for millions of years — explained by complicated natural changes in equilibrium between the oceans and the atmosphere — and the latest period of warming will not result in catastrophe.

Most global warming predictions are based on fluctuations in CO2 levels and temperature that happened between a relatively recent series of ice ages, said DePaolo, who was not involved in the new study, which will appear in tomorrow's issue of the journal Science.

Research suggests that solar variability accounts for up to 68 % of the increase in earths temperatures with strong association between solar sunspots / irradiance and global temperature fluctuations.

«The authors write that «the El Niño - Southern Oscillation (ENSO) is a naturally occurring fluctuation,» whereby «on a timescale of two to seven years, the eastern equatorial Pacific climate varies between anomalously cold (La Niña) and warm (El Niño) conditions,» and that «these swings in temperature are accompanied by changes in the structure of the subsurface ocean, variability in the strength of the equatorial easterly trade winds, shifts in the position of atmospheric convection, and global teleconnection patterns associated with these changes that lead to variations in rainfall and weather patterns in many parts of the world,» which end up affecting «ecosystems, agriculture, freshwater supplies, hurricanes and other severe weather events worldwide.»»

«We evaluate to what extent the temperature rise in the past 100 years was a trend or a natural fluctuation and analyze 2249 worldwide monthly temperature records from GISS (NASA) with the 100 - year period covering 1906 - 2005 and the two 50 - year periods from 1906 to 1955 and 1956 to 2005... The data document a strong urban heat island eff ect (UHI) and a warming with increasing station elevation... About a quarter of all the records for the 100 - year period show a fall in temperatures... that the observed temperature records are a combination of long - term correlated records with an additional trend, which is caused for instance by anthropogenic CO2, the UHI or other forcings... As a result, the probabilities that the observed temperature series are natural have values roughly between 40 % and 90 %, depending on the stations characteristics and the periods considered.»

Just because the relationship between tree rings and temperature has some fluctuations in it and there appear to be fluctuations in the tree ring thicknesses over time doesn't mean that you can't get equally good relationships as the geniuses on Wall Street have been able to develop.

However, my impression is the emperical evidence for the relationship between solar magnetic activity and atmospheric temperature is a correlation between their short term fluctuations.

The near - linear rate of anthropogenic warming (predominantly from anthropogenic greenhouse gases) is shown in sources such as: «Deducing Multidecadal Anthropogenic Global Warming Trends Using Multiple Regression Analysis» «The global warming hiatus — a natural product of interactions of a secular warming trend and a multi-decadal oscillation» «The Origin and Limits of the Near Proportionality between Climate Warming and Cumulative CO2 Emissions» «Sensitivity of climate to cumulative carbon emissions due to compensation of ocean heat and carbon uptake» «Return periods of global climate fluctuations and the pause» «Using data to attribute episodes of warming and cooling in instrumental records» «The proportionality of global warming to cumulative carbon emissions» «The sensitivity of the proportionality between temperature change and cumulative CO2 emissions to ocean mixing»

If there is a similarity between the long Stockholm record, other European records (13), and the Arctic record, as the overlapping period of records indicate, it is likely that the recorded fluctuations in the Arctic temperature are short fragments of a series of fluctuations in the climate.

Since these two time series represent largely independent mean temperature estimates for the same atmospheric layer, the strong correspondence between them is further proof that the fluctuations are real.

The difference between the «greenhouse effect» nonsense and «global temperature fluctuation» nonsense is that the «greenhouse effect» is impossible, but «global temperature fluctuation» is theoretically possible.

Apart from the small number of observations on which Salby bases his theory, the main error is in jumping from showing a correlation between temperature and short term fluctuations in CO2 to concluding that the long term trend must also be attributable to temperature.

To add briefly to my earlier point about the difference between short term CO2 growth rate fluctuations due to temperature changes and their inapplicability to long term trends, if we regress CO2 flux rate against temperature, it will show that a rise in temperature induces a change in flux rate in or out of terrestrial or oceanic reservoirs.

The results from tests of our first hypothesis differ from other studies in which time - series analyses were used to explore the relationship between the secondary sex ratio (SSR) and fluctuations in mean annual ambient temperature.

Our study incorporated a similar geographic range and range of fluctuations in temperature as the studies which have found a significant relationship between annual SSR and mean temperature [7], [11], [14].

Likewise, «during the middle - Pliocene... we find sea level fluctuations of 20 - 40 metres associated with global temperature variations between today's temperature and +3 °C» (Hansen, Sato et al., 2013).