Sentences with phrase «temperature graph posted»

Not exact matches

The resulting graphs of global temperature trends, generated by David Thompson of Colorado State, were posted on Realclimate a few days ago and are a very useful first step in potentially reducing some of the rhetorical noise.

And trophopheric and surface temperatures have undeniably increased from the 1970s through to 2017, the last year of full data, with only short slowdowns of a few years, as in the graphs I posted.

Hmm... well the graph you posted only dates from 1980 but clearly up to the year 2000 the hindcast is a much better match than the forecast for the 21st century and pretty close to the temperature record.

Your chart shows the difference between the absolute temperature in 1895 as measured using the GISP2 ice core proxy, and the absolute temperature as measured at a nearby location using the thermometers in the 2000s, ie, the difference between the end of the GISP2 icecore and the higher of the two blue crosses in last graph in the original post.

But looking at the big picture shown in the graph I posted, I see quite few time periods where there were five or ten years of flat or declining temperatures (including several during the satellite era) very much like what we're seeing today.

Roman M, Figure 1 in Hansen et al 1988, which I copied to my Post # 146 in this thread, shows the climate model control run (without any forcings) with all the trends and wiggles you might see in a graph of actual temperatures over recent times.

As satellite temperature records show much larger fluctuations due to ENSO events, that has the effect in his graph of shifting the post 2000 temperatures below those of the 1990s.

I wish that with all posts like this either a good ice core temperature proxy graph be linked to or included in the article as a constant reminder to the casual readers that are not up on the science as well as the well informed to never lose sight of the actual context that all these discussions should be held in.

The correlation coefficient for CO2 vs Temperature is either almost two or almost three times higher than the graph you posted.

It was March 2014 and climate deniers were still saying «the world was cooling since 1998 ′ — cherry picking in the least - established global temperature datasets, like that clunky old graph the University of Alabama keeps updating [no offense, we also have a thermometer in my backyard — but graphing and posting it does not really contribute to science.]

The thing I find most interesting about your post, is that this is another way at looking at the same problem, namely where is the CO2 signal in the temperature / time graphs?

They post a graph of the mean global temperatures.

tallbloke (05:52:23): According to the Scotese et al graph posted by Anthony on the Hansen thread, the temperature was about 10C higher when the co2 level was at 8000ppm 550M years ago.

You have posted some recent graphs on the same subject of CO2 and temperature doubling explaining your view elsewhere, thanks.

According to the Scotese et al graph posted by Anthony on the Hansen thread, the temperature was about 10C higher when the co2 level was at 8000ppm 550M years ago.

In several posts headed «Data tampering at USHCN / GISS», Goddard compares the currently published temperature graphs with those based only on temperatures measured at the time.

I'm not a climate scientist, just a lowly internal medicine physician, and I only saw the temperature / CO2 graph posted at an exhibit at the American Museum of Natural History in New York (in Nov. 2006) and I noticed that temperature led the CO2 increase and deduced that oceanic outgassing must be the cause.

Check Figure 3 (this is the graph, which I posted earlier, with actual temperatures added — but will post again):

IPCC published a front page graph which replaced the decline post 1960 in tree rings with a actual temperature graph..

As the comparison of temperature changes post 1990 is the «purpose» of the pseudo-skeptical interest in the FAR projections, the graphs are not suitable for the underlying purpose.

Please note that these are only problems when the graphs are used, contrary to their original purpose, to compare changes in temperature post 1990.

Because the graphs are not suitable for comparison of post 1990 changes in temperature, the original article included a graph for just that purpose:

He posted Ainley's other graph suggesting a correlation with rising peninsula temperatures and Adelie penguin declines.

The graph below (on the right) was published in may book in 2013 and also used in a post discussing how natural weather dynamics created Death Valley's world - record high temperature long before CO2 concentrations had any significance.

In the National Post of April 2, 2001, after the UN had adopted this graph as the official proof of global warming, I pointed out that the first nine centuries of the millennium were measured by using tree - ring cycles, and the modern era was represented by temperatures.

I remember Spencers post at WUWT, at the time I thought the technique he used was rather «unique»; From memory, dividing population densitys into «buckets» and using a temperature avg within those buckets to produce some very regular (visually pleasing) graphs from some quite irregular data.

As the first graph in the post shows, infilling has no effect on CONUS - average temperatures.

Can you post a graph of the different RCP's and observed temperatures, perhaps with CO2 generation forecast with observed.

I am sorry that it bothers you that Carl Zimmer would post a graph that shows temperatures rising followed 800 years later by carbon dioxide emissions rising as proof as a historical connection carbon dioxide emissions increases leading to global warming, and then when challenged on this point, can not update the graph to show the carbon dioxide emissions predating global warming.

Last time I checked, the sea surface temperatures of the Pacific Ocean (60S - 65N, 120E - 80W) haven't warmed in about 19 years, while the CMIP5 models indicate they should have warmed about 0.4 deg C: http://bobtisdale.wordpress.com/2012/12/06/model-data-comparison-pacific-ocean-satellite-era-sea-surface-temperature-anomalies/figure-2-42/ Graph is from this post: http://bobtisdale.wordpress.com/2012/12/06/model-data-comparison-pacific-ocean-satellite-era-sea-surface-temperature-anomalies/

It's only after this, post c. 17 kyr, that «global» temperatures start to rise, according to the graph.

In any case, I will post a graph of Hadley temperature history with ENSO «accounted for», to show how that increases the apparent size of the temperature response to Pinatubo.

Nic, I have a post in moderation that has graphs with regressions of the temperature response to 6 forcing agents from the Marvel data.

Guess I should update my RCP temperature graphs for 4º; will do so in a future post.

All this concern trolling about «hiding the decline» as the denialists phrase it, yet NOTHING on TGGWS when they posted a graph that seemed to show solar changes and temperature changes were concordant in the records beyond 2000, when the data shown never went that far.

Since this post was made, an additional 27 graphs (80 graphs accumulated as of now) do not support the belief that modern temperatures are unusual or unprecedented.

I'm pointing out that time - series graphs of TLT anomalies and SST anomalies and land surface temperature anomalies can not be used to conclude that the reason for the differences is solely UHI, and that's what's been done in this post.