Sentences with phrase «temperature over a long time period»

The models have done really well on temperature over a long time period so we trust that.

Not exact matches

UHT Soup - Soup which has been heat treated via ultra-high temperature (UHT) processing to become shelf - stable over a long period of time.
The thick covering of ice and water might mess up some of the geological processes that, at least on Earth, help regulate the planet's temperature over long periods of time.
Researchers also need to test a large number of battery cells over a long enough period of time under various physical conditions and temperatures to ensure that dendrites will never grow.
«If water temperatures increase as a result of climate change, this could have far - reaching consequences not only for the individual species, but also for the balance of the ecosystem, which has developed over a long period of time,» says Luckenbach.
For significant periods of time, the reconstructed large - scale changes in the North Pacific SLP field described here and by construction the long - term decline in Hawaiian winter rainfall are broadly consistent with long - term changes in tropical Pacific sea surface temperature (SST) based on ENSO reconstructions documented in several other studies, particularly over the last two centuries.
The body can cool itself over a short period of time and return to a normal temperature as long as cooling mechanisms are not overwhelmed by too much intense heat.
Heat capacity that is «used» over a longer period of time (penetration of temperature change through the depths of the ocean and up to regions of upwelling) would leave a more persistent residual imbalance, but the effect would only just stall the full change to equilibrium climate, not change the long term equilibrium sensitivity.)
Now the slow diffusion processes come into play: heat diffuses from the skin layer downward, and over a long period of time, the entire body of rock becomes the same as the surface temperature.
Holding concentrations or temperature (more remotely) to a particular target therefore means limiting cumulative emissions of, say, carbon over time... a limited amount of time if we are talking about an iterative approach, and over a long period of time if we are talking about reducing the likelihood of some very nasty consequences well after we (but not our grandchildren — if we are lucky enough to have some) are gone.
Over very long time periods such that the carbon cycle is in equilibrium with the climate, one gets a sensitivity to global temperature of about 20 ppm CO2 / deg C, or 75 ppb CH4 / deg C. On shorter timescales, the sensitivity for CO2 must be less (since there is no time for the deep ocean to come into balance), and variations over the last 1000 years or so (which are less than 10 ppm), indicate that even if Moberg is correct, the maximum sensitivity is around 15 ppm CO2 / deg C. CH4 reacts faster, but even for short term excursions (such as the 8.2 kyr event) has a similar sensitivOver very long time periods such that the carbon cycle is in equilibrium with the climate, one gets a sensitivity to global temperature of about 20 ppm CO2 / deg C, or 75 ppb CH4 / deg C. On shorter timescales, the sensitivity for CO2 must be less (since there is no time for the deep ocean to come into balance), and variations over the last 1000 years or so (which are less than 10 ppm), indicate that even if Moberg is correct, the maximum sensitivity is around 15 ppm CO2 / deg C. CH4 reacts faster, but even for short term excursions (such as the 8.2 kyr event) has a similar sensitivover the last 1000 years or so (which are less than 10 ppm), indicate that even if Moberg is correct, the maximum sensitivity is around 15 ppm CO2 / deg C. CH4 reacts faster, but even for short term excursions (such as the 8.2 kyr event) has a similar sensitivity.
Over even longer periods of time, such as thousand year time cycles, the effect of CO2 on temperature is much more noticeable.
Temperatures over that period varied probably by less than 2 deg C, so the climate during which we developed our way of life was very consistent when compared with the long - term geological time scale.
3 A) CLIMATE VS. WEATHER Climate is the weather pattern in one place over a long period of time Weather is the current atmospheric conditions, including temperature, rainfall, wind, and humidity at a given place
Both are at different time scales, where any (theoretical) influence of CO2 need to change the ocean temperatures over a sufficient long period (10 - 30 years), to be visible in the statistics.
Meaning, surface temperatures do not represent total heat of the entire atmosphere well, in this case the heat was really above, this drives surface temperature sensitivity quite wild over a longer time period.
The temperature at each land and ocean station is compared daily to what is «normal» for that location and time, typically the long - term average over a 30 - year period.
Almost any average temperature you wish depending on how you slice it and none of it has meaning except in the case that you slice it exactly the same way over successive measurements over a long period of time might tell you something.
Here's two sentences to get you started: Climate encompasses the statistics of temperature, humidity, atmospheric pressure, wind, rainfall, atmospheric particle count and numerous other meteorological elements in a given region over long periods of time.
Over short periods of time natural variability such as from ENSO for example, can create short term effects that run contrary to the longer term trend of increasing ocean heat content and higher tropospheric temperatures.
When we look over long enough periods the warming trend is likely to be weaker when the highly volatile time series are dropped as the most common expectation is that the largest changes in temperature will ultimately bee seen in the high latitude winter temperatures.
Consider two emission pathways, both with a cumulative total of 1 TtC, but one with a decaying emissions floor, and one with no emissions floor: the pathway without an emissions floor will cause a temperature peak earlier than the pathway with the decaying floor, as the emissions floor causes emissions to be emitted over a longer time period.
It doesn't mean that there can't be any natural variability that appears as wobbles in the temperature record (or in other climate variables), masking the multi-decadal temperature trend over a time scale shorter than 20 years with the effect that the longer term trend is not statistically detectable in the time series, if one chooses the time period only short enough.
However, over long time periods, the variation of the global average temperature with CO2 concentration depends on various factors such as the placement of the continents on Earth, the functionality of ocean currents, the past history of the climate, the orientation of the Earth's orbit relative to the Sun, the luminosity of the Sun, the presence of aerosols in the atmosphere, volcanic action, land clearing, biological evolution, etc..
Jan Perlwitz says:» It doesn't mean that there can't be any natural variability that appears as wobbles in the temperature record (or in other climate variables), masking the multi-decadal temperature trend over a time scale shorter than 20 years with the effect that the longer term trend is not statistically detectable in the time series, if one chooses the time period only short enough.»
As the chart depicts over 12 different time periods (all ending July 2014), reality is that while CO2 levels keep increasing over time, the long - term temperature warming trend (the red curve) is not rapidly accelerating towards a tipping point of climate catastrophe.
Tree rings, coral skeletons, and glacial ice cores (Figure 3) are proxies for annual temperature records, while boreholes (holes drilled deep into Earth's crust) can show temperature shifts over longer periods of time.
This also means, of course, that in a long temperature record, say 100 years, we can * expect * to see a negative trend over a 17 year period five times.
The longer the period over which trends are computed, the more these naturally occurring fluctuations in the temperature time series tend to average out.
Weather is the daily temperature, it can fluctuate to each extreme rapidly whereas climate is an average of temperatures over a long period of time.
This time period is too short to signify a change in the warming trend, as climate trends are measured over periods of decades, not years.12, 29,30,31,32 Such decade - long slowdowns or even reversals in trend have occurred before in the global instrumental record (for example, 1900 - 1910 and 1940 - 1950; see Figure 2.2), including three decade - long periods since 1970, each followed by a sharp temperature rise.33 Nonetheless, satellite and ocean observations indicate that the Earth - atmosphere climate system has continued to gain heat energy.34
The Average weather conditions in an area over a long period of time and is determined by two main factors, temperature and precipitation.
Over a long period of time its environment has deteriorated so that we now expect that it is measuring a temperature considerably higher than the temperature which would have existed if the environment at that location had remained unchanged.
Over longer time periods, however, the differences between different temperature series» settle out, and all show comparable warming temperature trends.
Not because the calculation is complicated — just take how much the global average temperature has changed over some longish time period (a couple of decades or longer) and divide by much energy was used to force that change.
The problem with that argument is that over long periods of time (like the six decades since 1950), positive and negative phases of ocean cycles tend to cancel each other out, and thus internal variability doesn't have a large influence on long - term temperatures.
Weather v. Climate ► Climate: The average temperature and precipitation in an area over a long period of time.
A region's climate describes the characteristic pattern of weather conditions within a region, including temperature, wind velocity, precipitation, and other features, averaged over a long period of time.
Climate: Atmospheric conditions (temperature, rainfall, etc...) of a region over a long period of time
They will refer to ENSO as showing «internal variability» by which they mean that ENSO can run warm at some times and cool at others but that these temperatures must sum to zero, or approximately so, over longer periods of time.
We know from archeology and paleontology that in fact the overall temperature of the earth is a relatively stable quantity over very long periods of time.
Over longer periods of time, however, it becomes increasingly unlikely that the Triple R could have persisted as a cohesive feature over two consecutive winter seasons by random chance alone, which supports the notion that highly unusual ocean temperatures played a fundamental rOver longer periods of time, however, it becomes increasingly unlikely that the Triple R could have persisted as a cohesive feature over two consecutive winter seasons by random chance alone, which supports the notion that highly unusual ocean temperatures played a fundamental rover two consecutive winter seasons by random chance alone, which supports the notion that highly unusual ocean temperatures played a fundamental role.
If over a long period of time that portion of the ocean accumulates heat, then the index (a statistic calculated from temperatures and pressures) running mean will change over that time span.
Temperatures cherry - picked from a short time period are going to deviate from the mean value over a longer period.
This indicates to me that the rate of energy being added to the oceans has not increased over a longer time period and that there is thus a discrepancy between land and ocean temperature data.
The only possible explanation for why the average temperature of the ocean is 4C is because that is the average surface temperature of the earth taken over a period of time long enough for convection and conduction to equilibrate the entire volume.
We generated a large number of synthetic monthly time series to mimic the natural temperature data over a long period of 37,002 mo..
Since the volcanic forcing tends to be like a very high frequency spike, the temperature response to the forcing is lower in magnitude than you would expect if the forcing were sustained over a longer time - period.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z