Sentences with phrase «temperature over the same period»

Thus the high rate of increase is almost totally irrelevant to the behavior of temperature over the same period.

Of course, DS can (and should already have) calculated the change in insolation at the northern spring equinox over the last thousand (or two thousand) years, and plotted it against changes in temperature over the same period.

The regions of moisture increase are associated with regions of rising temperatures over the same period, and the regions of decreased moisture are associated with falling temperatures.

Now there were two papers put out by a Swiss team (you should know who) on consideration of European warming where they argued that natural effects could be ruled out; the first paper argued for strong water vapour feedback causing the 1980 to 1998 temperature rise and the later paper, using exactly the same data, argued for a reduction in aerosols causing a recovery in temperatures over the same period.

Not exact matches

The average daily maximum temperature during the pup - rearing period was roughly 1 °C higher in the first 12 years of monitoring than in the second 12 years, and over the same period the average number of pups surviving per pack per year fell from five to three.

Boersma and Rebstock looked at the cause of every recorded chick mortality in an Argentinian colony of Magellanic penguins, over a nearly 30 - year period, and compared these with changes in temperature and precipitation over the same time.

The scientists then compared their findings to global temperatures over the same time period.

Over the same period, temperatures have risen, drying soils faster.

The public, press and policy makers have been repeatedly told that three claims have widespread scientific support: Global temperature has risen about a degree since the late 19th century; levels of CO2 in the atmosphere have increased by about 30 % over the same period; and CO2 should contribute to future warming.

Over the same period, global temperature has risen markedly (top).

The public, press and policy makers have been repeatedly told that three claims have widespread scientific support: Global temperature has risen about a degree since the late 19th century; levels of CO2 [carbon dioxide] in the atmosphere have increased by about 30 percent over the same period; and CO2 should contribute to future warming.

Why not, using the same scaling, show the temperature changes from 1910 to 1945 and from 1945 to 1975 against the CO2 and Sun change over those periods and try and explain why that would show next to no relationship on that scaling?

While the observed Antarctic temperatures rose by about 0.4 degrees Fahrenheit (0.2 degrees Celsius) over the past century, the climate models simulated increases in Antarctic temperatures during the same period of 1.4 degrees F (0.75 degrees C).

The temperature anomaly on Earth over the same period is about 10 times larger, hence the suggestion that IF the ACRIM inferred changes in the mean insolation are correct, then the inferred increase in solar radiance would account for about 10 % of the temperature anomaly over the same period.

In Fig. 8, I have digitized the outer bounds of the model runs in Fig. 7, and also plotted the HadCRUT3 global annual mean temperature anomaly over the same period.

As presented below, the temperature record of each of these groups (available at the URLs given at the bottom of this message) shows the same features: (i) a warming of about 0.9 °C (1.6 °F) over the past 150 years and (ii) natural variability with both short and long periods.

Now the slow diffusion processes come into play: heat diffuses from the skin layer downward, and over a long period of time, the entire body of rock becomes the same as the surface temperature.

Until you can provide one, one that explains why the known forcings over the same period of time had no affect on temperature, they are meaningless.

B. Over the same time interval there have been periods during which the reported «Annual Temperature of the Earth (TOE)» has increased, others during which it decreased, and yet others, like the most recent 15 - 20 years over which it has remained statistically fOver the same time interval there have been periods during which the reported «Annual Temperature of the Earth (TOE)» has increased, others during which it decreased, and yet others, like the most recent 15 - 20 years over which it has remained statistically fover which it has remained statistically flat.

I think if you put that top graph alongside a temperature anomaly for the same time period, you'd see a reduction in both over the last twelve years.

When flatlining temperatures wreck your global warming agenda, refusing to rise after 18 + long years in hiatus, despite record human CO2 emissions over that same period, simply homogenise, adjust (tamper) with the data.

Apparently an Australian Legislator named Stephen Fielding posted this chart and asked, «Is it the case that CO2 increased by 5 % since 1998 whilst global temperature cooled over the same period (see Fig. 1)?

This was my mental equation dF = dH / dt + lambda * dT where dF is the forcing change over a given period (1955 - 2010), dH / dt is the rate of change of ocean heat content, and dT is the surface temperature change in the same period, with lambda being the equilibrium sensitivity parameter, so the last term is the Planck response to balance the forcing in the absence of ocean storage changes.

The reconstruction also «reveals a long - term cooling trend of -0.31 °C per 1,000 years (± 0:03 °C) over the 138 B.C. - A.D. 1900 period...» This trend is not reflected in tree ring width data from «the same temperature - sensitive trees.»

Does nt hot air expand???, Hasn't there been an increase in temperature and total ice in Antarctica over the same period, both transported in.

During that same period, average annual rainfall in New South Wales declined by 3.6 inches (92 millimeters).3 Scientists think the decline in autumn rainfall in southeast Australia since the late 1950s may be partly due to increases in heat - trapping gases in Earth's atmosphere.3, 14 Major bushfires over southeast Australia are linked to the positive phase of an ocean cycle called the «Indian Ocean Dipole» — when sea surface temperatures are warmer than average in the western Indian Ocean, likely in response to global warming.15, 16

It is currently suspected, for example, that the recent increase in deep - ocean heat content is driven by geothermal sources rather than atmospheric (which would solve the «paradox» that shallow ocean temperatures, over the same period, have fallen slightly).

Almost any average temperature you wish depending on how you slice it and none of it has meaning except in the case that you slice it exactly the same way over successive measurements over a long period of time might tell you something.

Further, there is firm evidence that migration of CO2 isn't important in the Vostok and Dome C ice cores over the past 800,000 years: each glacial / interglacial period shows the same ratio between temperature and CO2 changes: about 8 ppmv/degr.C.

Over the same period, the globally and annually averaged land and sea surface temperature (HadCRUT3) increased by 0.7 °C.

The fact this is seemingly not fully recognized — or here integrated — by Curry goes to the same reason Curry does not recognize why the so called «pause» is a fiction, why the «slowing» of the «rate» of increase in average ambient global land and ocean surface air temperatures over a shorter term period from the larger spike beyond the longer term mean of the 90s is also meaningless in terms of the basic issue, and why the average ambient increase in global air temperatures over such a short term is by far the least important empirical indicia of the issue.

By contrast, air temperatures over the Antarctic region for the same period were above average in some areas, such as the Antarctic Peninsula and near the pole, but below average in others.

At the Equator sea surface temperature rose by 0.5 °C over the same period.

Global temperature has risen about a degree since the late 19th century; levels of CO2 in the atmosphere have increased by about 30 % over the same period; and CO2 should contribute to future warming.

The SST data are a little more complex than the weather station data with which most of use are familiar: Whereas temperature measurements at weather stations have been performed according to a standard protocol for over a century, measurement methods for SST data have changed significantly over the same period.

SINCE Viner's epic fail in 2000, the global temperature dial has been stubbornly stuck on Pause, with some of the «snowiest» and coldest winters on record occurring over the same period, despite record and rising CO2 emissions...

Over the same period of time as the upper ocean is supposed to have warmed by some 0.05 C (according to ARGO), the sea surface temperature (HADSST2) has cooled by 0.063 C.

The public, press and policy makers have been repeatedly told that three claims have widespread scientific support: Global temperature has risen about a degree since the late 19th century; levels of CO2 in the atmosphere have increased by about 30 % over the same period; and CO2 should contribute to future warming.

Once again the very natural cycle of the AMO caused the average temperature of the Earth to increase over the exact same period of time that the AMO was increasing.

I believe it is more likely that something else is driving both the global temperature averages, as well as the PDO, AMO, and SOI changes over that same time period.

The public, press and policy makers have been repeatedly told that three claims have widespread scientific support: Global temperature has risen about a degree since the late 19th century; levels of CO2 [carbon dioxide] in the atmosphere have increased by about 30 percent over the same period; and CO2 should contribute to future warming.

Firstly, that the statistical distribution of the observed 15 - year global temperature trends since 1880 isn't distinguishable from the distribution of 15 - year global temperature trends derived from an ensemble of model simulations, and, secondly, whether simulated global temperature trends over 15 years since 1950 lie in the same tail of the statistical distribution as the observed 15 - year temperature trends or whether the simulated and observed trends lie in opposite tails of the distribution largely depends on whether the simulated and observed ENSO variablity over the 15 - year periods are in phase or out of phase by chance.

Over this same period Global temperature increased by 0.54 °C and Atmospheric CO2 increased by 66 ppmv or 20 %

The temperature trends over same length time periods, e.g. 20 years, have a frequency distribution, too.

The observational facts are; Solar activity has decreased slightly over the same period temperatures have levelled off.

You may wonder why the government finds the need to pursue such action since 1) U.S. carbon dioxide emissions have already topped out and have generally been on the decline for the past 7 - 8 years or so (from technological advances in natural gas extraction and a slow economy more so than from already - enacted government regulations and subsidies); 2) greenhouse gases from the rest of the world (primarily driven by China) have been sky - rocketing over the same period, which lessens any impacts that our emissions reduction have); and 3) even in their totality, U.S. carbon dioxide emissions have a negligible influence on local / regional / global climate change (even a immediate and permanent cessation of all our carbon dioxide emissions would likely result in a mitigation of global temperature rise of less than one - quarter of a degree C by the end of the century).

Mann re-iterated that the MBH reconstruction had the same amplitude as the increase in temperature over the calibration period and ignored the flattening out in the proxies that was worrying Severinghaus.

But let's look at the long - term NOAA record of tropospheric specific humidity and compare this with the HadCRUT globally and annually averaged land and sea surface temperature anomaly over the same period:

California's record warmest year occurs at the peak of a sustained, long - term warming trend in the state over the past century or so — the same period over which the Earth's global mean temperature has risen by 1.5 ° F.

... To determine the TCS metric, we use actual physical data for the: 1) average surface temperature anomaly of 1850 - 2012, 2) atmospheric CO2 concentration history, and 3) rise in Total Solar Irradiance over the same period of time.