Sentences with phrase «temperature water followed»

Not exact matches

O made this bread last night but as a lot of other people have stated below, after nearly 2 hours in the oven it was still raw I followed all the processes step by step and I would say the mixture was firm definitely not runny, so am really confused as t what has gone wrong, I even turned up the oven temperature to over 200 for the last half an hour as was getting a bit desperate............... perhaps ella you may be able to post a picture of the dough just before it goes in the oven so we can see what you mean by firm as that may be where it goes wrong OR should I just try with using less water?

I currently wash my diaper laundry on hot (water heat set to non-scald temperatures) with detergent (and sometimes OxiClean) followed by a cold rinse.

When washing and bathing your child, follow the recommendations on water temperature described above.

Through the following months, you can introduce your baby to different temperature of water, i.e. hot, cold and warm.

And valuable fish stocks move all around the globe, following water of their preferred temperature.

Using their innovative approach, Emsley's team found that the sequence of protein motions follows a specific hierarchy as temperature increases: first the protein's solvent molecules, then the protein's side - chains and water molecules, and finally the protein's backbone.

By analyzing this data over the following six months, the researchers found that clouds that grew at the lowest temperatures required extremely high relative humidity in order for water vapor to form an ice crystal around a dust particle.

The lines indicate the counterclockwise wind rotation that drove gulf waters onto the shore; their color shows air temperature (yellow is warmest, followed by red and blue, with coolest in white).

This El Niño reached a peak in ocean temperatures in November and those waters have been cooling off ever since, following the normal progression.

In preparation for in situ hybridization, tissue specimen slides at room temperature were deparaffinized by soaking in three changes of Hemo - De solvent (Scientific Safety Solvents, Keller, TX) for 5 min each, followed by two 1 - minute rinses in 100 % ethanol, an incubation in a solution of 45 % formic acid (Fisher) / 0.3 % hydrogen peroxide (Calbiochem) for 15 min, and a rinse in water for 3 min.

I always start my day with two large glasses of room - temperature water (this stimulates your digestive - colic reflex aka elimination time) followed by a mug of warm bone broth.

Leaders of any water ‑ based activities must consider all of the following before proceeding: the water temperature, weather forecast and tidal conditions, as well as the swimming competency in «real conditions» of all members of the party.

Toyota's new 1.5 - litre in the Yaris follows similar themes to Mazda's Skyactiv units - a higher compression ratio, clever valve timing, and in Toyota's case, a water - cooled exhaust manifold that removes the need for a richer mixture at cruising speeds to keep combustion temperatures low.

Once freed, if the dog is suffering, apply the following first aid: Get him into the shade, pour cool (not cold) water on him or use cool towels to gradually lower body temperature.

They follow the seasonal water temperature changes, being closely tied to these warm waters.

Insufficient water pressure or temperature took sixth place, followed by unexpected fees (including resort fees) in seventh and insufficient or poor lighting in eighth.

In fact, from 1900 - 1940 where the 20th century's greatest temperature increase took place, sea level actually dropped, while the following cooler temperatures correlated with a sea level rise (remember when water gets hot it evaporates!).

If C02 is the largest single contributing factor to the Greenhouse Effect (because supposedly water vapor is only involved as a feedback to primary chemistry involving C02 itself), and C02 lags temperature increases (as has been stated on this very blog), how has the Earth ever returned to colder glacial conditions following periods of warming?

The implication is that summer temperatures predispose the near - surface waters to above - or below - normal ice coverage in the following fall and winter.

From the article: A new study released Monday found that warming temperatures in Pacific Ocean waters off the coast of North America over the past century closely followed natural changes in the wind, not increases in greenhouse gases related to global warming.

That exception is that the GCMs apply the Clausius - Clapeyron equation to make water vapor increase following (lagging) increased surface temperature.

Coral bleaching follows when coral loses the algae that live within it from the effects of rising water temperatures and pollution.

The data seems to very clearly show that past temperature increases are followed by CO2 increases (which makes logical sense from my rudimentary understanding of CO2 solubility in water).

To point out just a couple of things: — oceans warming slower (or cooling slower) than lands on long - time trends is absolutely normal, because water is more difficult both to warm or to cool (I mean, we require both a bigger heat flow and more time); at the contrary, I see as a non-sense theory (made by some serrist, but don't know who) that oceans are storing up heat, and that suddenly they will release such heat as a positive feedback: or the water warms than no heat can be considered ad «stored» (we have no phase change inside oceans, so no latent heat) or oceans begin to release heat but in the same time they have to cool (because they are losing heat); so, I don't feel strange that in last years land temperatures for some series (NCDC and GISS) can be heating up while oceans are slightly cooling, but I feel strange that they are heating up so much to reverse global trend from slightly negative / stable to slightly positive; but, in the end, all this is not an evidence that lands» warming is led by UHI (but, this effect, I would not exclude it from having a small part in temperature trends for some regional area, but just small); both because, as writtend, it is normal to have waters warming slower than lands, and because lands» temperatures are often measured in a not so precise way (despite they continue to give us a global uncertainity in TT values which is barely the instrumental's one)-- but, to point out, HadCRU and MSU of last years (I mean always 2002 - 2006) follow much better waters» temperatures trend; — metropolis and larger cities temperature trends actually show an increase in UHI effect, but I think the sites are few, and the covered area is very small worldwide, so the global effect is very poor (but it still can be sensible for regional effects); but I would not run out a small warming trend for airport measurements due mainly to three things: increasing jet planes traffic, enlarging airports (then more buildings and more asphalt — if you follow motor sports, or simply live in a town / city, you will know how easy they get very warmer than air during day, and how much it can slow night - time cooling) and overall having airports nearer to cities (if not becoming an area inside the city after some decade of hurban growth, e.g. Milan - Linate); — I found no point about UHI in towns and villages; you will tell me they are not large cities; but, in comparison with 20-40-60 years ago when they were «countryside», many small towns and villages have become part of larger hurban areas (at least in Europe and Asia) so examining just larger cities would not be enough in my opinion to get a full view of UHI effect (still remembering that it has a small global effect: we can say many matters are due to UHI instead of GW, maybe even that a small part of measured GW is due to UHI, and that GW measurements are not so precise to make us able to make good analisyses and predictions, but not that GW is due to UHI).

What it would take is another big El Nino event (analogous to 1998) that turns over the ocean waters somewhat, followed by another lull, but at a higher temperature.

Following Professor Pielke's analogy (on his pages, I think) of heating a pan of water, he seems to be saying that you don't need multiple measurements to understand a trend as long as you have enough spacial resolution, and that somehow «heat» is more important than «temperature».

Once a temperature threshold is breached, abrupt events follow due to amplifying feedbacks, even within a few years, examples being (1) freeze events which followed temperature peaks during past interglacial peaks due to influx of cold ice - melt water into the north Atlantic Ocean; (2) the Dansgaard — Oeschger warming events during the last glacial period; (3) the Younger dryas stadial freeze and the Laurentian stadial freeze.

It is also the result of scientific analysis of the temperature and CO2 records, omitted by IPCC, which show that atmospheric CO2 follows temperature according to Henry's Law of solubility for CO2 in water.

[41] The water vapour content of the air between the top of the air and the altitude of pressure P (atm) is decreasing roughly like P4.5 [42]: hence 80 % of the total water vapour is between P = 1 and P = 0.75 near 2.3 km, and the total water content of the air closely follows the surface temperature.

Then water vapor follows the hydrostatic distribution and its total amount in the column is determined by surface temperature.»

When you compare this with the actual surface temperature of ~ 288 K and the temperature in absence of the greenhouse effect but no change in albedo of ~ 255 K, what we can say is the follows: The greenhouse effect due to all the greenhouse gases (water vapor, clouds, and the long - lived GHGs like CO2 and CH4) raises the temperature of the Earth by an amount of ~ 33 K (which is 288K — 255K); the albedo due to cloud reduces the temperature by ~ 17 K (which is 272 K — 255 K); the net effect of both the GHGs and the cloud albedo is ~ 16 K (which is 288K — 272K).

Even IPCC models use thermodynamics, and in particular the Clausius - Clapeyron relation, to model water vapor as following temperature, not leading it.

Success with ammonia means we will have developed and commercialized, at scale, with viable economics, infrastructure and supply chains, the following new technologies: CCS, SSAS, methane cracking, conventional and high temperature electrolysis and thermochemical water splitting for hydrogen production, nuclear heat sources and small modular reactors, and solar heat sources and renewable electricity of sufficient reliability to be integrated into high volume must - run industrial processes.

El Nino leftover warm water pools drift into different parts of the oceans and continue to warm for years, an effect not characterized by the ENSO index, but clearly visible in sea surface temperature maps and in the temperature step changes and plateaus following El Ninos.

I would interpret this as a sequence of step functions followed by multiyear declines (when El Nino leftover warm water pools slowly lose their heat), superseeded by a warming trend, caused by other natural and anthropogenic causes, which in sum just keep the temperature about constant after the step function.

Predicted increases in temperature will drive increased shrinkage of glaciers, leading to initial increases in melt water produced, followed by subsequent declines with reduced glacier mass.

Based on the understanding of both the physical processes that control key climate feedbacks (see Section 8.6.3), and also the origin of inter-model differences in the simulation of feedbacks (see Section 8.6.2), the following climate characteristics appear to be particularly important: (i) for the water vapour and lapse rate feedbacks, the response of upper - tropospheric RH and lapse rate to interannual or decadal changes in climate; (ii) for cloud feedbacks, the response of boundary - layer clouds and anvil clouds to a change in surface or atmospheric conditions and the change in cloud radiative properties associated with a change in extratropical synoptic weather systems; (iii) for snow albedo feedbacks, the relationship between surface air temperature and snow melt over northern land areas during spring and (iv) for sea ice feedbacks, the simulation of sea ice thickness.

Again following the pesky basic physics involved the water vapor will be at the same temperature as the liquid water which was evaporated.

But it was cold this winter and C02 is plant food and only a trace gas and the greenhouse effect has been disproved anyway and even if the greenhouse effect does exist, C02 has negligible impact compared to water vapour and our only source of heat is the sun so it must be the sun, unless it is due to the C02 from volcanoes, but C02 follows warming so it can't be the C02 and the medieval warm period was warmer anyway and all the temperature reconstructions that show this not to be true are produced by corrupt scientists being paid by corrupt governments that have colluded to create an excuse to form a one world unelected social - ist government and even if the scientists are not that corrupt, although the e-mails prove they are, they have still got it wrong as the climate sensitivity is not as high as they think it is because it is basically the planets orbits and cosmic rays so we can say for a fact that the warming that probably does not exist is definatley not due to humans and even if it was the evidence is not sufficient to make drastic changes to the economy and increase taxes so that the politicians and scientists and business leaders get rich and leave us all poor — do they think we are stupid or something?

The models (and there are many) have numerous common behaviours — they all cool following a big volcanic eruption, like that at Mount Pinatubo in 1991; they all warm as levels of greenhouse gases are increased; they show the same relationships connecting water vapour and temperature that we see in observations; and they can quantify how the giant lakes left over from the Ice Age may have caused a rapid cooling across the North Atlantic as they drained and changed ocean circulation patterns.

It follows from this that the logarithmic dependence of the outgoing longwave radiation (which by the way, has to do the the exponential decay of the absorption coefficient away from the center of the absorption line) can still lead to significant temperature changes, particularly since water vapor enhances the value of λ and smoothes out a plot of the outgoing radiation vs. temperature (making it more linear than T ** 4).

On the other hand, Gavin Schmidt of NASA GISS, one of the topmost scientists involved in the Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming cause, in a recent paper clearly asserts that: • 75 % of the Greenhouse effect is attributable to water vapour and clouds • 100 % of the increase in CO2 emissions since 1850 (110 ppmv) is Man - made Following these numbers through and accounting for the effect of other Greenhouse gases results in a Man - made temperature rise between 1850 and 2010 of 2.21 °C.